Obama approval up to 68% on gallup
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 04:24:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Obama approval up to 68% on gallup
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Obama approval up to 68% on gallup  (Read 2052 times)
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 03, 2009, 12:50:49 PM »

Wow.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Job-Approval.aspx
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,938


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2009, 12:59:05 PM »

But, but, Carl Hayden assured me that Obama's honeymoon would be over by now!
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2009, 01:01:02 PM »

This is clear evidence that as the economy continues to worsen so will Obama's numbers. He's doomed in 2012!

Dems should be careful in 2010!!
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2009, 01:02:58 PM »

It's Gallup. That's worse than a Uni poll, lately.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,999
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2009, 01:35:38 PM »

People have been saying his honeymoon would end since March. That was Phil's argument for why they were favored to win NY-20 and why it was a "free House seat" for them.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2009, 01:37:45 PM »

People have been saying his honeymoon would end since March. That was Phil's argument for why they were favored to win NY-20 and why it was a "free House seat" for them.

How did I miss THOSE posts? Tongue
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,750
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2009, 01:41:29 PM »

Guys these numbers are higher/lower than I want them to be, junk poll.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2009, 01:43:43 PM »

Why is there a 12 point gap between Gallup and Rassmussen?
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2009, 01:46:45 PM »

Guys these numbers are higher/lower than I want them to be, junk poll.

I do agree the numbers are quite high, his real numbers are probably somewhere in the low 60's.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,953


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2009, 04:39:11 PM »

People have been saying his honeymoon would end since March. That was Phil's argument for why they were favored to win NY-20 and why it was a "free House seat" for them.

How did I miss THOSE posts? Tongue

Hey, everyone thought the Republicans were favored in NY-20 when it opened up.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 03, 2009, 04:47:55 PM »

People have been saying his honeymoon would end since March. That was Phil's argument for why they were favored to win NY-20 and why it was a "free House seat" for them.

How did I miss THOSE posts? Tongue

Hey, everyone thought the Republicans were favored in NY-20 when it opened up.

I even predicted we would lose, too. But I based it more off of the fact that special elections typically have low turnout and Murphy didn't seem to be a terribly appealing candidate. But I didn't think they would get it as easily as some did. (Though, of course, they failed.)
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 03, 2009, 05:22:46 PM »

68 percent of Americans are out-of-touch liberal extremists. Bad news for the GOP.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 03, 2009, 05:45:14 PM »

People have been saying his honeymoon would end since March. That was Phil's argument for why they were favored to win NY-20 and why it was a "free House seat" for them.

LOL

Find where I said NY 20 was a free House seat for the GOP. I love when you blatantly lie.

People have been saying his honeymoon would end since March. That was Phil's argument for why they were favored to win NY-20 and why it was a "free House seat" for them.

How did I miss THOSE posts? Tongue

Hey, everyone thought the Republicans were favored in NY-20 when it opened up.

Wrong (at least concerning my prediction). Now I'm calling BRTD because I did not say that and certainly wasn't cocky throughout that campaign about our chances.


This is clear evidence that as the economy continues to worsen so will Obama's numbers. He's doomed in 2012!

Dems should be careful in 2010!!

BECAUSE 2010 WILL DEF BE LIKE MAY 2009!
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,999
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 03, 2009, 05:52:17 PM »

And then who can forget picking up a House seat?

You're getting a bit ahead of yourself there, especially considering Obama won the seat.

It's likely that we'll get it.

Based on what? Like I said, Obama won the seat and the special election will be held during his "honeymoon".

All you have going for your side is that Obama won the seat which really doesn't mean too much. Admit it.

It's a Republican district with a Republican bench. Oh, and the Special will likely be sometime in March or April, I assume. I don't think Obama is going to be looking so pretty then.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 03, 2009, 05:54:38 PM »

the other 32% are racists and/or morons, obviously.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 03, 2009, 05:56:36 PM »

the other 32% are racists and/or morons, obviously.

Most of them, maybe. Tongue
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 03, 2009, 05:56:46 PM »

the other 32% are racists and/or morons, obviously.

Nope, just Republicans.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 03, 2009, 05:58:36 PM »


like i said...

Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 03, 2009, 05:59:04 PM »

And then who can forget picking up a House seat?

You're getting a bit ahead of yourself there, especially considering Obama won the seat.

It's likely that we'll get it.

Based on what? Like I said, Obama won the seat and the special election will be held during his "honeymoon".

All you have going for your side is that Obama won the seat which really doesn't mean too much. Admit it.

It's a Republican district with a Republican bench. Oh, and the Special will likely be sometime in March or April, I assume. I don't think Obama is going to be looking so pretty then.

Where did I say it was a free seat?

In fact, I wasn't even cocky about our chances. I said Obama won't be looking as pretty then. I was wrong. Oh well. You love playing the hindsight game.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 03, 2009, 06:00:08 PM »

Gallup hasn't been good since.....well never.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 03, 2009, 06:05:29 PM »

And then who can forget picking up a House seat?

You're getting a bit ahead of yourself there, especially considering Obama won the seat.

It's likely that we'll get it.

Based on what? Like I said, Obama won the seat and the special election will be held during his "honeymoon".

All you have going for your side is that Obama won the seat which really doesn't mean too much. Admit it.

It's a Republican district with a Republican bench. Oh, and the Special will likely be sometime in March or April, I assume. I don't think Obama is going to be looking so pretty then.

Where did I say it was a free seat?

In fact, I wasn't even cocky about our chances. I said Obama won't be looking as pretty then. I was wrong. Oh well. You love playing the hindsight game.

Phil it really does look like you were being cocky about the GOP's chances... sometimes it is just easier to admit you were wrong rather than argue about nothing.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 03, 2009, 06:10:27 PM »

And then who can forget picking up a House seat?

You're getting a bit ahead of yourself there, especially considering Obama won the seat.

It's likely that we'll get it.

Based on what? Like I said, Obama won the seat and the special election will be held during his "honeymoon".

All you have going for your side is that Obama won the seat which really doesn't mean too much. Admit it.

It's a Republican district with a Republican bench. Oh, and the Special will likely be sometime in March or April, I assume. I don't think Obama is going to be looking so pretty then.

Where did I say it was a free seat?

In fact, I wasn't even cocky about our chances. I said Obama won't be looking as pretty then. I was wrong. Oh well. You love playing the hindsight game.

Phil it really does look like you were being cocky about the GOP's chances... sometimes it is just easier to admit you were wrong rather than argue about nothing.

I've admitted when I was wrong plenty of times here so please don't lecture me on how to act after a defeat. Thanks.

I wasn't being cocky. I've said countless times to people on this forum that we shouldn't be cocky about elections. I've said it about PA 10 when it was seen as a sure GOP pickup in 2008.

My comments about NY 20 were in no way a suggestion that the seat was a "free seat" for the GOP. BRTD blatantly lied about that and, of course, nothing is said about that. All we get is "Phil appeared cocky. Phil was wrong."
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 03, 2009, 11:59:14 PM »


We have been trying to figure this out in the Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread.

It's obvious now that Obama's approvals are somewhere around 65-70/25-30 among ADULT polls, at about 60-65/30-35 in Registered Voter polls and at 55-60/30-40 in most Likely Voter polls.

Sam Spade thinks that Likely Voters are lying to real people (Democracy Corps and most other RV and adult pollsters) more than they are to machines (Rasmussen) when they are polled. According to Rowan Brandon people are more likely to disapprove of Obama when they are confronted with a computer voice instead of a real person.

But it still not explains the 13-point-difference in the Congressional Ballot between DEMCorps (50-40 DEM) and Rasmussen (41-38 GOP). Why should people lie in favor of Republican Congressional candidates ?

Why is there a big difference between adults/registered/likely voters. The share of minorities, especially Hispanic and Asian immigrants who are not allowed to vote and therefore are not registered or Likely voters is higher among all adults. Also, young voters are not as likely to be registered, a segment with strong Obama approvals.

Remember that only 131 Mio. of 232 Mio. US adults voted last year (57% likely voters).

Maybe the other 43% are approving of Obama by 75-25 margins, who knows ?
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 04, 2009, 12:19:58 AM »


Obviously because Rasmussen is a right wing hyper-partisan, who uses push polls and sleazy tactics to advance the Republican agenda.

Why do you even question this?

...JK, it's probably because he uses likely voters instead of regular voters.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 04, 2009, 11:56:24 AM »

Gallup uses adults, not RV.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 11 queries.