Atlasian Agriculture Reinvestment Bill (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:42:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Atlasian Agriculture Reinvestment Bill (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Atlasian Agriculture Reinvestment Bill (Law'd)  (Read 3204 times)
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


« on: May 17, 2009, 12:27:56 AM »

Sounds like we want to reduce food. Someone give me the quick pros to cutting off subsidies to farmers so dramatically.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2009, 12:57:50 AM »

Sounds like we want to reduce food. Someone give me the quick pros to cutting off subsidies to farmers so dramatically.

     Reduces government spending & allows a fairer playing field for foreign farmers (maybe we should include a provision to help induce other countries to reduce farm subsidies as well). I don't know about you, but those are the reasons I like it.

I get the reason to oppose increased farm subsidies in the future, but simply shutting industries down rapid-fire seems like a bad idea. If you want to reword the bill to phase the cuts over a few years I could support that. This just seems to take a sledgehammer to the ag sector.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2009, 03:00:10 PM »

And I propose a friendly amendment to both of those to state "spread evenly."
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2009, 06:34:45 PM »

Probably have to let Happy accept your amendment and my amendment to that.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2009, 10:33:09 PM »

I'd be happy to accept both as friendly.  Mostly I just wanted to start discussion on something dear to my heart with this bill.  I'm more trying to get rid of tobacco subsidies with this bill and stop them from big corporate farms which don't need them.

I agree that we can't continue to throw cash at big tobacco and large corporate farms. I just want to make sure we do this the right way.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2009, 07:20:12 PM »

Nay
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.