Yank for Senate HQ (Victory Speech)

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

You can hardly rant against "good old boys" when you yourself are a member of one of the Machine Parties. It's dishonest.

Not hardly. In fact the Revolution is nothing more then yet another group of Good ole' boys seeking to overthrow the previous set. Its why Revolution is folly and most people don't want it. I said that stronger parties were a necessity to strengthen Atlasia and that was correct. You just want  the type of condition we were in last December with record low turnout. I tend to think a little bigger, thank you.

Plus its not as if you aren't a member of a Good ole' boys club yourself.

[Jayhawker]

Good luck, Senator Yankee!

[Sibboleth]

You can hardly rant against "good old boys" when you yourself are a member of one of the Machine Parties. It's dishonest.

Not hardly. In fact the Revolution is nothing more then yet another group of Good ole' boys seeking to overthrow the previous set. Its why Revolution is folly and most people don't want it. I said that stronger parties were a necessity to strengthen Atlasia and that was correct. You just want  the type of condition we were in last December with record low turnout. I tend to think a little bigger, thank you.

Plus its not as if you aren't a member of a Good ole' boys club yourself.

Answer my point please.

[Χahar]

This is one of the more intellectually dishonest things I've read this year.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Speaking of Good Ol Boys, what is the Southeast? They elect this guy and Dan Adams. If that isn't a Good Ol Boy club, I don't know what is.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Speaking of Good Ol Boys, what is the Southeast? They elect this guy and Dan Adams. If that isn't a Good Ol Boy club, I don't know what is.

For all those people too ignorant and stupid I clearly was refering to an all too common practice of letting nominees sail through, with nothing but cheers and wishes of Good luck instead of tough questioning and vetting, that was all too common when I arrived in the Senate. It should be obvious that I was referring to Keystone Phil's month of shame as Atty General.

As to the question which is by no means related to what I said. I don't view the two maine parties as machines, and I don't see why I should be labeled that when I opposed machine style tactics within the party. What was I to do leave the party cause I didn't approve of those tactics. Its not like the some of you who can easily find yourselves at home in the DA, JCP, or LNF. There is only one conservative party and thus there was no alternative.

This is one of the more intellectually dishonest things I've read this year.

Thats because you disagree with me. I am not dishonest for disagreeing with you Xahar.

[Alexander Hamilton]

There is no conservative party. There are merely fraud parties and revolutionaries.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

There is no conservative party. There are merely fraud parties and revolutionaries.

Revolution is a fraud so all parties are frauds. I am glad that has been cleared up.

[Alexander Hamilton]

There is no conservative party. There are merely fraud parties and revolutionaries.

Revolution is a fraud so all parties are frauds. I am glad that has been cleared up.

Cite?

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

There is no conservative party. There are merely fraud parties and revolutionaries.

Revolution is a fraud so all parties are frauds. I am glad that has been cleared up.

Cite?

Google Russia, China, Cambodia, France, or Cuba. You tell me how Revolution made them any better. Russia got a severe famine that killed millions. China had millions killed in the Cultural Revolution, Cambodia had millions killed in Gov't led exterminations, France had the terror and Napoleon, and Cuba got Castro and his minions. Mexico had countless Revolutions and that country is still the same Sh**t hole its always been. All Revolutions that are both political and social end in failure and the blood is usually mostly from the poor who the Revolutionaries claim to represent.

Another way of putting it is In the movie, Duck! You Sucker. When Juan gives his little piece on Revolutions. "The people who read the books, they go to the poor people who don't read the books and say its time to have a change, And so the poor people make the change. Then the people who read the books sit at the big polished tables, and talk, and talk, and talk, and talk, and eat, and eat, and eat, but what has happened to the poor poor people? THEY'RE DEAD! Thats your Revolution.... And then what happens? The same f**king thing starts all over again." 

[Alexander Hamilton]

American Revolution?

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

American Revolution?

Wasn't a social/class Revolution. Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hancock were among the richest men in the colonies.

[Alexander Hamilton]

American Revolution?

Wasn't a social/Revolution. Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hancock were among the richest men in the colonies.

Doesn't matter. They were out to overthrow their imperialist rulers.

[Fmr. Emperor PiT]

American Revolution?

     That was a War of Independence. France got it straight, why can't America?

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

American Revolution?

Wasn't a social/Revolution. Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hancock were among the richest men in the colonies.

Doesn't matter. They were out to overthrow their imperialist rulers.

Thats a political Revolution. The main goal was to separate one region from the rule of another and to defend liberties they though they rightfully derserved. Washington was just as rich after the Revolution as before and the landed elite would run the country for years afterward. The Social/class structure remained intact.

[Alexander Hamilton]

American Revolution?

Wasn't a social/Revolution. Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hancock were among the richest men in the colonies.

Doesn't matter. They were out to overthrow their imperialist rulers.

Thats a political Revolution. The main goal was to separate one region from the rule of another and to defend liberties they though they rightfully derserved. Washington was just as rich after the Revolution as before and the landed elite would run the country for years afterward. The Social/class structure remained intact.

We shall overthrow them all.

[Χahar]

Portugal

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

American Revolution?

Wasn't a social/Revolution. Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hancock were among the richest men in the colonies.

Doesn't matter. They were out to overthrow their imperialist rulers.

Thats a political Revolution. The main goal was to separate one region from the rule of another and to defend liberties they though they rightfully derserved. Washington was just as rich after the Revolution as before and the landed elite would run the country for years afterward. The Social/class structure remained intact.

We shall overthrow them all.

Why? So you can kill 20 million people and be a member in the Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Castro club of brutal killers.

Portugal

Not very familiar with Portugal, but if I am correct they overthrew there monachy in I think 1906 and ended up later with barely anything better in the form of a dicatorship in the 30's/40's.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Because Cultural Marxism is the future. We are bringing Atlasia into the 82st century.

[Χahar]

Portugal

Not very familiar with Portugal, but if I am correct they overthrew there monachy in I think 1906 and ended up later with barely anything better in the form of a dicatorship in the 30's/40's.

I wasn't quite referring to that...

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Because Cultural Marxism is the future. We are bringing Atlasia into the 82st century.

Keep the change.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Portugal

Not very familiar with Portugal, but if I am correct they overthrew there monachy in I think 1906 and ended up later with barely anything better in the form of a dicatorship in the 30's/40's.

I wasn't quite referring to that...

What were you referring to then?

[Χahar]

Portugal

Not very familiar with Portugal, but if I am correct they overthrew there monachy in I think 1906 and ended up later with barely anything better in the form of a dicatorship in the 30's/40's.

I wasn't quite referring to that...

What were you referring to then?

Look a bit further on in Portuguese history.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Portugal

Not very familiar with Portugal, but if I am correct they overthrew there monachy in I think 1906 and ended up later with barely anything better in the form of a dicatorship in the 30's/40's.

I wasn't quite referring to that...

What were you referring to then?

Look a bit further on in Portuguese history.

Don't have time for that tonight. I got to get off in ten minutes.

[Bacon King]

best of luck to you this weekend.