Expanding Nuclear Energy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 11:49:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Expanding Nuclear Energy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you support expanding nuclear energy to meet CO2 emissions reductions?
#1
Democrat: Yes
 
#2
Democrat: No
 
#3
Republican: Yes
 
#4
Republican: No
 
#5
independent/third party: Yes
 
#6
independent/third party: No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 47

Author Topic: Expanding Nuclear Energy  (Read 6963 times)
Countess Anya of the North Parish
cutie_15
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,561
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -4.35

« on: May 24, 2009, 09:33:04 PM »

No.
Logged
Countess Anya of the North Parish
cutie_15
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,561
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -4.35

« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2009, 11:15:07 PM »

fertilizer
h20 car thing
solar
wind
electric.

i just don't like nuclear.
Logged
Countess Anya of the North Parish
cutie_15
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,561
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -4.35

« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2009, 09:00:52 AM »

fertilizer
h20 car thing
solar
wind
electric.

i just don't like nuclear.

     Getting enough energy to fuel a nation with those is difficult. The idea behind nuclear is that it allows us to produce large amounts of energy cleanly & safely.

It is not safe.
Logged
Countess Anya of the North Parish
cutie_15
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,561
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -4.35

« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2009, 09:14:01 AM »
« Edited: May 25, 2009, 09:18:29 AM by Dc_united_15 »

fertilizer
h20 car thing
solar
wind
electric.

i just don't like nuclear.

     Getting enough energy to fuel a nation with those is difficult. The idea behind nuclear is that it allows us to produce large amounts of energy cleanly & safely.

It is not safe.

How do you think nuclear compares in safety to other energy forms?

depends on the form. Nuclear is very risky. Also what will happen to the waste?
Logged
Countess Anya of the North Parish
cutie_15
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,561
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -4.35

« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2009, 12:34:07 PM »

ok. But what happens if something goes wrong?
Logged
Countess Anya of the North Parish
cutie_15
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,561
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -4.35

« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2009, 10:32:00 PM »

depends on the form. Nuclear is very risky.
How many people die every year getting coal out of the ground and transporting it?  How many tons of sulphur and mercury and worse get dumped into our atmosphere every year when we turn that coal into electricity? 
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
What happens to coal waste?
Not to mention that coal waste as stored actually emits more radiation than radioactive waste.
nulcear waste will be here forever if we go that way.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.