Do you believe in √(-1)? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:09:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Do you believe in √(-1)? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you believe in √(-1)?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
I'm agnostic
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: Do you believe in √(-1)?  (Read 5623 times)
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
« on: June 08, 2009, 09:33:06 PM »

No. I believe in quaternions.
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2009, 12:45:34 AM »
« Edited: June 09, 2009, 12:48:18 AM by Storebought »


Hamilton's greatest achievement. Too bad we quit teaching and using them in favor of vector and matrix formalism. Matrices always work as a representation, but the beauty of simple elements like quaternions directly shows symmetry.

After lecturing for a day or so about quaternions, the professor just admitted, "Physicists struggle, mightily, to find a proper use for these things."

Math as given through matrix representatives is simply easier to follow. But even with finite rotations, which are well handled by matrices, the math gets to be too much for us poor humble chemists. Just give us the character table for the rotation and be done with it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.