Poland Considers Pulling All Troops Out
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:56:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Poland Considers Pulling All Troops Out
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Poland Considers Pulling All Troops Out  (Read 3251 times)
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 04, 2004, 07:46:41 PM »
« edited: October 04, 2004, 08:08:53 PM by Defarge »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Reactions? 
Logged
○∙◄☻„tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,731


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2004, 07:51:57 PM »
« Edited: October 04, 2004, 07:55:19 PM by jfern »

You forgot Poland.
BTW, hasn't Poland done horribly in every war they've fought in? I think that the French bashers should bash Poland some, you know, to be fair.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2004, 07:53:34 PM »

They're about it with coalition partners. No alarm.

By the end of 2005, BTW.
Logged
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2004, 08:08:36 PM »

They're about it with coalition partners. No alarm.

By the end of 2005, BTW.

Woops.  Corrected
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2004, 08:09:51 PM »

No not Poland!!! I thought their people loved the war!!
Logged
freedomburns
FreedomBurns
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,237


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2004, 08:11:14 PM »

Jeeze, doesn't that mean that we have lost 10 of the original 30 members of the coalition already?  And now we are losing the country that has contributed the second largest amount of troops (second to England).

This bodes ill for the future prospects of the war in Iraq.  Who do we have left after Britain?  I know Honduras and Costa Rica and Haiti have pulled out?  Who is still in this coalition?  Japan?  Phillipines?  Who has troops on the ground?  Fewer and fewer as the going gets tough.

freedomburns
Logged
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2004, 08:18:53 PM »

No problem.  President Kerry will have French and German troops flooding into Iraq.  Chirac is just waiting for Kerry to say when.
Logged
freedomburns
FreedomBurns
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,237


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2004, 08:21:55 PM »

No problem.  President Kerry will have French and German troops flooding into Iraq.  Chirac is just waiting for Kerry to say when.
Your sarcasm is unappreciated. 
Logged
Shira
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,858


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2004, 08:31:02 PM »

Jeeze, doesn't that mean that we have lost 10 of the original 30 members of the coalition already?  

Coalition? don't make me laugh.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2004, 08:32:48 PM »

Seeing as even the United States, Great Britain, and Australia is a coalition...start laughing.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2004, 09:09:48 PM »

And things keep going downhill and Iraq.

LOL, this is funny.  Just a week after the debate where Bush corrected Kerry by saying "You forgot Poland!"  If I'm Kerry, I'm all over this. 
Logged
Giant Saguaro
TheGiantSaguaro
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,903


Political Matrix
E: 2.58, S: 3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2004, 09:17:00 PM »
« Edited: October 04, 2004, 09:34:10 PM by TheGiantSaguaro »

Well somebody brought up a good point. All we need to do is get Kerry in. It's a wrong war, it's ill-advised, it's a diversion, we can't win, and knowing all of the above (because John Kerry says so, and that's all the reason we need), Kerry will get France and Germany to come in (because Kerry's just better than Bush) and get it done for us. They'll help. Boy, I feel better already. Chirac's a regular Napoleon, boy, you bet.
Logged
khirkhib
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 967


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2004, 09:33:42 PM »

Jeeze, doesn't that mean that we have lost 10 of the original 30 members of the coalition already?  And now we are losing the country that has contributed the second largest amount of troops (second to England).

This bodes ill for the future prospects of the war in Iraq.  Who do we have left after Britain?  I know Honduras and Costa Rica and Haiti have pulled out?  Who is still in this coalition?  Japan?  Phillipines?  Who has troops on the ground?  Fewer and fewer as the going gets tough.

freedomburns

I would actually be impressed had Haiti had troops in Iraq.  I'm not even sure if Haiti has troops in Haiti.  I think your thinking about the Dominican Republic.  The people were estatic when they pulled out.  They country is broke right now though and really couldn't afford a military expedition.  It was probably good training for the troops though.
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2004, 09:42:29 PM »

Looks like the head Pollock is smarter than Bush or Kerry. Smiley
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 04, 2004, 10:40:16 PM »

Not much reaction.  They made a notable contribution, but they can't be expected to stay forever.  In the end, Poland should be congratulated for going above and beyond the call of duty.

Btw #1
Poland likes the US and agrees with the war.  Even Globescan's survey shows that.

Btw #2
Kerry did forget Poland, and a country that gave us a year and a half of commitment and is now promising over a year more, is no small potatoes.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 04, 2004, 11:02:00 PM »

I agree with John Ford 100%
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 04, 2004, 11:18:13 PM »

You forgot Poland.
BTW, hasn't Poland done horribly in every war they've fought in? I think that the French bashers should bash Poland some, you know, to be fair.

Actually, Poland was historically a huge Kingdom that controlled what is now Belarus, Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovakia, and parts of Russian and Moravia. They were a great power from the 15th to 17th centurys thanks to the Jagiellonians, and in the 18th century their power began to weaken. In (I believe) 1832 Poland officially became part of Russia. Poland had previously been a Russian and Prussian vassal duchy, but they nonetheless were their own nation. The Poles have also been a very tolerant people, and one of the reasons why they were so successful is because they had educated Jews running the government. After World War II, the Polish nation was created, but after only around 20 years of freedom Poland was once again conquered by another power, this time the Germans. Directly afterwards, the Soviets took over Poland and it became incorperated into the USSR as the Soviet Republic of Poland.

So to answer your illintended and foolish question, the Poles only after the 18th century lost many battles, but only because they were a conquered nation. In addition, Poland has faithfully helped the US forces in the Iraqi war, and I would understand why they would pull them out in January (especially with the growing amounts of terrorism in Slavic Europe.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2004, 04:49:07 AM »

Polish pilots played a major role in the Battle of Britain. Don't knock them.

Poland was a satellite state of the Soviet Union, but was never actually incorporated into it.

As for troops on the ground:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinational_force_%28Iraq%29
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2004, 05:51:24 PM »

No, Poland was incorperated into Russia, not the Soviet Union. I believe that was in 1832, but Russia de facto integrated Poland with Russia.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 06, 2004, 05:42:23 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

That's what I was saying was inaccurate.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 06, 2004, 02:48:59 PM »

You are correct, I was mistaken. Yes, Poland became a Russian satellite state, not an SSR as I had initially thought, though Russia, Kazakastan, Ukraine, Belarus, etc became SSRs.

"It became a Soviet satellite state following the war, but its government was comparatively tolerant and progressive."
-World Factbook
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 06, 2004, 02:55:01 PM »

My Grandad taught Free Poles English
Logged
Jens
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,526
Angola


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 06, 2004, 05:13:25 PM »

Sweet. Where I come from we used to import Poles as a cheap workforce working in the sugar turnips fields. Result: people with funny surnames and a large catholic minority Wink
Logged
Jens
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,526
Angola


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2004, 05:14:41 PM »

And here is a short outline of Polish history (with years)

1386: Kingdom of Poland and Grand Duchy of Lithuania is united in a personal union under Jagiello of Lithuania who is baptised at the same time

1466 Poland-Lithuania finally defetes the Teotonic Order and gains Danzig (Gdansk)

1569 Lithuania is finally incorporated into Poland

1572 Death of the last of the Jagiellos kings marks the end of the Polish "golden" age. Poland becomes an electorate and the nobilities becomes more and more powerfull via the Sejmen (parliament) where the need for unanimity (Liberum Veto) hinders a centralized and powerfull state.

1605-12 Polish occupation of Moscow. The strike for the Russian throne fails but Smolensk is gained in 1618. The Polish state reaches its territorial zenit

1697- 1763 Poland is united with Saxony. Constant fighting with the Swedes who tries to take over the country.

1764 The Russian candidate (and the lover of Katherine the Great) is elected as king.

1772 The first partition of Poland after attempts to abolish the Liberum Veto

1791 An attempt to create a heditary monarcy is stopped by Pressia and Russia and to reestablish order the second partition is conducted in 1793

1795 After a rebellion Poland is partitions for the third time and ceases to exist Sad

1807/09 Napoleon recreates Poland as the Grand Duchy of Warcaw

1814/15 The majority of the Grand Duchy is united with Russia as "Congress Poland"

1830-1831 After a rebellion Poland is incorporated into Russia in 1832

1846 and 1863 Fruitless Polish rebellions. A sense of Polish nationality is created in Austrian Galizia at the universities of Krakow and Lemberg.

1916 Kingdom of Poland, a German protectorate is created

1918 Poland gains her independence after the collaps of Russia and Germany

1918-1921 Poland starts conquering nabouring territories and after a war with USSR the Polish border is establised some 250 km from the Curzon-line, the border originally surgested by the Entente thus creating a state with more than 8 million non-polish inhabitants

1926 the Pilsudski-coup brings an end to Polish democracy

1938 At Munich Poland gains parts of Czechoslovakia

1939 Poland is conquered by Germany and USSR

1939-1945 between 3 and 8 million Poles is killed. The majority is civilians

1944-1945 Poland is conquered by the Red Army

1947 The Communists gains the power via heavy election fraud and Poland becomes "People's Republic of Poland"

1956 Rebellions in Poznan (Posen) is defeted but creates a system change where the national communists under Gomulka gains the power

1980 Strikes begins in Gdansk and Warsaw lead by Solidarnosc (Lech Walesa)

1981-1983 As a respons to the strikes Poland is a de facto military dictatorship under General Jarulezski

1989 Poland becomes a republic and Solidarnosc wins the first elections

1990 Lech Walesa becomes president

1999 Poland becomes a NATO-member

2004 Poland becomes a member of the EU


Well, I suppose "short" isn't really the correct term. I got a bit carried away Cheesy
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2004, 06:17:43 PM »

I was right about 1832, yay.

Eastern Europe one of the most fascinating part of European history. It's so melancholious. Ukrainian history is very fascinating (even though Ukraine's history really is Russia's history, since Ukrainians really are just physically better-looking Russians with a different dialect).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.062 seconds with 11 queries.