Liberapedia versus Conservapedia

[RIP Robert H Bork]

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=96486.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=96529.0

OK, since we have two recent polls regarding each Web site and their articles about Obama (see above), I decided to run a poll about the actual sites as opposed to particular articles.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Liberalpedia is stupid and unfunny.  At least Conservapedia is funny.

[Edu]

I was under the impression that liberapedia is a joke site, not a serious one like Conservapedia

[Joe Republic]

I was under the impression that liberapedia is a joke site, not a serious one like Conservapedia

Correct.  Liberapedia has the intention of being funny, but fails.  Conservapedia has the intention of being serious, but fails.

[Associate Justice PiT]

     Liberapedia is better due to being a joke wiki rather than a serious one. Anyone who takes either seriously is a horrible, horrible person though.

[Stranger in a strange land]

     Liberapedia is better due to being a joke wiki rather than a serious one. Anyone who takes either seriously is a horrible, horrible person though.

[dead0man]

How sure are we that conservapedia is what it claims to be?

[Edu]

How sure are we that conservapedia is what it claims to be?

Maybe this will help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia

[Tonberry]

Until I voted, Conservapedia had the edge in this poll. It's tied for now.

I find Liberapedia to be superior and I expect that the reason it's not leading in this poll is because the people who like it won't take this sort of poll seriously enough to vote. I, however, take "not being serious" very seriously and have therefore expressed my opinion.

Still, Wikipedia remains the most awesome thing on the internet.

[Lunar]

who reads these 'pedia's and where can I beat them up?

[minionofmidas]

Lol at combining "liberal" with a red star.

How stupid can you Americans get in your misuse of "liberal"?

[dead0man]

How sure are we that conservapedia is what it claims to be?

Maybe this will help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia

Holy Schlafly Spawn Batman!  They come from the same town me, Franzl, Robert Wadlow and Miles Davis come from.

[Magic 8-Ball]

How sure are we that conservapedia is what it claims to be?

Maybe this will help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia

Holy Schlafly Spawn Batman!  They come from the same town me, Franzl, Robert Wadlow and Miles Davis come from.

Are we to assume, then, that the three of you and zombie Robert Wadlow are editors?

[Hash]

Lol at combining "liberal" with a red star.

How stupid can you Americans get in your misuse of "liberal"?

^^^

[dead0man]

How sure are we that conservapedia is what it claims to be?

Maybe this will help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia

Holy Schlafly Spawn Batman!  They come from the same town me, Franzl, Robert Wadlow and Miles Davis come from.

Are we to assume, then, that the three of you and zombie Robert Wadlow are editors?

Well, zombie Wadlow doesn't do much.  Empties the trash mainly...oh and he watches the weather on TV for hours at a time.

..and to be honest, me and Miles spend a lot of time out back smoking....things.  Franzl does almost all of the work.  This shouldn't surprise anybody.

[Magic 8-Ball]

How sure are we that conservapedia is what it claims to be?

Maybe this will help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia

Holy Schlafly Spawn Batman!  They come from the same town me, Franzl, Robert Wadlow and Miles Davis come from.

Are we to assume, then, that the three of you and zombie Robert Wadlow are editors?

Well, zombie Wadlow doesn't do much.  Empties the trash mainly...oh and he watches the weather on TV for hours at a time.

..and to be honest, me and Miles spend a lot of time out back smoking....things.  Franzl does almost all of the work.  This shouldn't surprise anybody.

He finds brains to eat, I hope.  If not, that might explain his poor performance. 

[dead0man]

We're located next to an orphanage/nunnery.

[Magic 8-Ball]

We're located next to an orphanage/nunnery.

It's time to let the big guy loose to do his thing. 

[Lunar]

Why would anyone want to make a wiki-encyclopedia with an intentional ideological slant, anyway?

A news station makes sense, you have viewers you have to whore your news out to such that your advertisers will pay you more.  But a non-profit wiki?  Seems odd.

There's already better Republican places to get news, like RedState.

Who can read this stuff except for laughs?
http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_hate_speech#Liberal_hate_speech_against_African-Americans

[dead0man]

That Howard Dean joke was pretty funny.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Lunar]

It's hard to imagine the crowd that I'd feel comfortable saying that in though, assuming I'm not Cris Rock

[dead0man]

Any group "of color" would be ok I'd assume........assuming they liked you of course.  I wouldn't recommend walking up to a strange group "of color" and laying that one on them, but who knows.

[Ronnie]

That Obama article on Liberalpedia appears to be written by a 3rd grader.  Haha.

[Magic 8-Ball]

Why would anyone want to make a wiki-encyclopedia with an intentional ideological slant, anyway?

Frustrated computer nerds? 

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Schlafly fanatics?

[Coburn In 2012]

Liberalpedia is a joke site and Conservapedia is a serious site.  What more can you say?  Just like the two idealogies.