Lowell (MA) Sun endorses Bush

[London Man]

This is in MA-5 where Kerry ran for the House in 1972.

Endorsement: George W. Bush for president

It's about national security.
That's the key issue on the minds of Americans planning to vote in the Nov. 2 presidential election.

They must decide whether Republican President George W. Bush or Sen. John F. Kerry, a Democrat, can provide the leadership to safeguard America from foreign terrorism.

Americans aren't fools. They know that without safe cities and towns, America will lose its greatness. Our cherished freedoms and sacred liberties will be diminished, along with our opportunities for economic prosperity and our basic pursuit of happiness.

Our children and their children will live vastly different lives if we fail to guarantee a future free of turmoil.

Islamic extremists, both here and abroad, have one purpose: To destroy America and halt the spread of democracy and religious tolerance around the globe. 

They'd like to be plotting in our streets right now. They'd like to be sowing murder and mayhem with suicide bombers and hostage-takings, and spreading fear in the heartland and everywhere else. They'd like to be wearing us down and bringing our nation to its knees.

Since the devastating terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, one American leader has maintained an unbending resolve to protect our homeland and interest against Islamic savages and those foreign governments appeasing them.

That leader is President Bush.

While out-of-touch U.S. politicians and world leaders have attacked President Bush's tactics, they can't question his steely commitment to keep America safe.

In the ashes of ground zero, where nearly 3,000 innocent Americans perished, President Bush vowed to find the perpetrators, in domestic cells and distant lands, and bring them to justice. He said he will do all that is humanly possible and necessary to make certain that terrorists never strike again on U.S. soil.

Can anyone deny that President Bush has not delivered? America the terrorists' No. 1 target has recovered from its tragic wounds and rebounded. It remains safe to this day.

What might a lesser leader have done, faced with the daunting task of deciding America's course against withering, partisan attacks from Democrats, media propagandists, disingenuous U.N. officials and disloyal White House operatives selling their souls for profit during a time of war?

A lesser leader might have caved in. President Bush has stood his ground.

In this year's election, the question isn't whether we are safer now than we were four years ago. We already know the answer. Sure we are and that's because of President Bush. The critical question is: Four years from now, will America be safer than it is today?

In our book, Americans have to place their trust in President Bush. He's proven to be as sturdy as a mighty oak when it comes to saying what he means, meaning what he says and acting decisively.

When it comes to the war on terror, President Bush means to keep our military strong and our country secure.

John Kerry, on the other hand, has all the attributes of the shape of water when it comes to telling us what he believes and what he'd do for America. Like incoming and outgoing tides, Kerry is content to go with the flow. In a dangerous world infested with sharks, Kerry would be chum at America's expense.

We in Massachusetts know John Kerry. He got his first taste of politics 32 years ago in the cities and towns of Greater Lowell.

In his 20 years in the U.S. Senate, Kerry, a Navy war hero, hasn't risen above the rank of seaman for his uninspiring legislative record. He's been inconsistent on major issues. First he's for the 1991 Persian Gulf War, then he opposes it. First he's for the war in Iraq, then he's against it. First he's for a strong U.S. defense, then he votes against military weapons programs. First he's for the U.S. Patriot Act, then he opposes it.

Kerry's solution to stop terrorism? He'd go to the U.N. and build a consensus. How naive. France's Jacques Chirac, Germany's Gerhard Schroeder, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan and other Iraq oil-for-food scam artists don't want America to succeed. They want us brought down to their level. And more and more, Kerry sounds just like them. In a recent campaign speech, Kerry said America was in the wrong war, in the wrong place, at the wrong time.

No doubt John Kerry sincerely wants to serve his country, but we believe he's the wrong man, in the wrong place, at the wrong time.

Americans should think back three years ago to the smoldering ruins of the World Trade Center. There among the mist lay the images and memories of fallen firefighters, police, a Catholic chaplain and ordinary working citizens moms, dads, sons, daughters.

President Bush, through heartfelt tears, told us never to forget the twisted carnage and the massacre of the innocents. Yet some of us are forgetting.

President Bush told us the attacks must never happen again. Yet some of us are wavering because of the brave sacrifice of soldiers that our nation's security demands.

Well, President Bush hasn't forgotten. Nor has he lost the courage and conviction to do what is right for America.

We know if there is one thing the enemy fears above all else, it is that George Bush's iron will is stronger than his iron won't.

The Sun proudly endorses the re-election of President George W. Bush.

Discuss.

[Sibboleth]

The day that Lowell votes for Bush is the day hell freezes over.

[angus]

I visited Lowell once.  Had a buddy who was a high-school science teacher in the school there.  Big guy, all carnivore.  My impression:  It's about an hour northeast of Boston.  Very blue collar, but with some artsy types.  Normally, I'd say white collar folks like the GOP, blue-collar types like the dems.  At least that's the way it is in flyover country, and used to be that way everywhere.  But times are a'changin.  When I lived in Boston, I noticed that the well-educated white-collar crowd actually preferred Kerry over Weld, and Gore over Bush, and the southies, typically blue-collar tenth-generation irish-americans, liked Bush over Kerry.  (?!?!)  Plutocracy ain't what it used to be.  Give it another few years and the cycle that Bill Clinton set in motion will be complete.  The affluent will prefer the dems, and the poor folks will like the GOP.  The way it was a hundred years or so before now.  Before Franklin Roosevelt came along.

I say that sort-of tongue-in-cheek.  As I can't imagine Dick Cheney's capitalist crowd jumping ship that fast.  Only wanted to point out the bizarre alliances we have now.  I'd agree that, based on the few previous elections, and the fact that Kerry isn't of yankee stock the way bush is (read:  papist, as opebo might say) that the stereotypical lowell type would favor Kerry over Bush.  Still, stranger things have happened. 

(last time I talked to him, my buddy that I mentioned was still undecided.  but then that was before Bush's dismal performance in the debate.)

[lidaker]

Wasn't Paul Tsongas from Lowell?

And welcome back, angus.

[angus]

  I'm not back.  Every time I come back I get addicted and don't get any work done.  But thanks! 

Yeah, Tsongas was, and so was Jack Kerouac!

[DFLofMN]

Well, I guess the Crawford TX, newspaper endorsed Kerry, but I don't think Texas is going to go blue this year.

[A18]

You mean red?

[DFLofMN]

Red as republican, but blue in the sense of this forum

[Defarge]

Is this the newspaper who sunk Kerry's congressional run by endorsing the other guy?

And I believe Crawford's local newspaper endorsed Kerry.  *shrug* Damn hometown newspaper's aren't good for anything!

[MA Liberal]

I hate Lowell but it's paper doesn't sound too bad

[jimrtex]

And I believe Crawford's local newspaper endorsed Kerry.  *shrug* Damn hometown newspaper's aren't good for anything!

The publisher isn't from Crawford.  In fact, the Crawford paper didn't even exist until after Bush was elected President.

[London Man]

Lowell's NW of Boston, not NE. If you go NE of Boston, you hit the Atlantic Ocean.

[Democratic Hawk]

Has this paper ever endorsed Kerry? I got the impression from Sean Hannity that it had NEVER supported Kerry - if so, it's hardly a coup for Bush

Dave