Opinion of Pbrower2

[JSojourner]

Seriously...this guy is good.  I am really enjoying his contributions.

[Franzl]

HP, an overrated partisan hack that keeps repeating the same stuff, as if that made it true.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

HP, an overrated partisan hack that keeps repeating the same stuff, as if that made it true.

^^^^^^^^

He writes long posts with mostly innacurate information written in a way to make it sound intelligent when it's still mostly innacurate.

[JSojourner]

HP, an overrated partisan hack that keeps repeating the same stuff, as if that made it true.

^^^^^^^^

He writes long posts with mostly innacurate information written in a way to make it sound intelligent when it's still mostly innacurate.

What am I missing?  I think a couple of his posts in the 2012 folder have been outstanding.

[Frodo]

Better than a lot of the liberals on this forum.

[Hash]

HP. He thinks that writing long posts with maps and partisan bullsh**t make his contributions seem intelligent and useful.

[Keystone Phil]

HP, an overrated partisan hack that keeps repeating the same stuff, as if that made it true.

^^^^^^^^

He writes long posts with mostly innacurate information written in a way to make it sound intelligent when it's still mostly innacurate.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

He kind of reminds me of a Democratic version of J. J.

[Mint]

He kind of reminds me of a Democratic version of J. J.

JJ is funny.

[Magic 8-Ball]

HP, an overrated partisan hack that keeps repeating the same stuff, as if that made it true.

^^^^^^^^

He writes long posts with mostly innacurate information written in a way to make it sound intelligent when it's still mostly innacurate.

Eh, word vomit is never fun.

I am surprised he took my joke about Eisenhower seriously.

[Rowan]

His posts go on and on and on...

And then when he is done you sit there and say "That was a waste of my life."

[Vepres]

He's a hack who manages to turn Democratic talking points into multiple paragraphs that are written in an intelligent manner, but are ultimately still partisan talking points.

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

HP, an overrated partisan hack that keeps repeating the same stuff, as if that made it true.

^^^^^^^^

He writes long posts with mostly innacurate information written in a way to make it sound intelligent when it's still mostly innacurate.

This, and one of the worst actually. I don't even bother to read the pages of crap he writes in his posts anymore. I mean, the guy is under the impression that Tennessee, West Virginia and Arkansas are locks for Obama in 2012 because he has a 50% approval in them, and that Utah has a possibility to flip. HE sounds intelligent, but it's complete bullsh**t.

[Associate Justice PiT]

HP, an overrated partisan hack that keeps repeating the same stuff, as if that made it true.

^^^^^^^^

He writes long posts with mostly innacurate information written in a way to make it sound intelligent when it's still mostly innacurate.

This, and one of the worst actually. I don't even bother to read the pages of crap he writes in his posts anymore. I mean, the guy is under the impression that Tennessee, West Virginia and Arkansas are locks for Obama in 2012 because he has a 50% approval in them, and that Utah has a possibility to flip. HE sounds intelligent, but it's complete bullsh**t.

     Really? I stopped reading his stuff a long time ago, but that makes me want to see some of it again just to laugh at it.

[Smid]

I like him. He can be is quite hackish, but I still enjoy reading his posts. He's analytical, and while I often disagree with the outcomes, often times the logic is still there to back it up. I like the guy, I think he's a good contributor who balances out Republican hacks like me.

[Alcon]

Same beef I have with J. J. -- dustbowl empiricism with a clear bias.