Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 24, 2013, 05:36:41 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
Election What-ifs?
(Moderator:
Bacon King
)
Powell v. Clinton - 1996
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Poll
Question:
Powell v. Clinton
Powell
10 (32.3%)
Clinton
15 (48.4%)
Perot
6 (19.4%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 28
Author
Topic: Powell v. Clinton - 1996 (Read 1632 times)
Hermit
Guest
Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
on:
October 06, 2004, 02:19:43 pm »
Back in '96, there was some talk of trying to nominate Colin Powell as the challenger. Let's say that he does run, and is somehow nominated as well. Does he beat Clinton? If so, who runs against him in 2000?
Logged
TexasGurl
texasgurl24
YaBB God
Posts: 7788
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -3.30
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #1 on:
October 06, 2004, 03:03:43 pm »
Not a chance of beating bill.
Clinton would have still won the black vote.
Logged
PBrunsel
YaBB God
Posts: 9644
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #2 on:
October 06, 2004, 09:24:17 pm »
No win for Powell. He would probably break 200 electoral votes, but Powell woulkd lose. Clinton was unbeatable in 1996.
Logged
"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
opebo
YaBB God
Posts: 44664
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #3 on:
October 06, 2004, 10:09:58 pm »
I'm not sure there would have been much of an ideological gap between these two. But Clinton would've won easily. Powell wouldn't get as many states as Dole, as places like Mississippi, South Carolina, etc, would've gone to Clinton.
Logged
Quote from: opebo on December 17, 2012, 03:47:32 pm
prostitutes, bedpans, toupees etc.
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 21569
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #4 on:
October 06, 2004, 10:21:55 pm »
Quote from: opebo on October 06, 2004, 10:09:58 pm
I'm not sure there would have been much of an ideological gap between these two. But Clinton would've won easily. Powell wouldn't get as many states as Dole, as places like Mississippi, South Carolina, etc, would've gone to Clinton.
What makes you think that the south wouldn't have been ready to vote for a black Republican in 1996? A black Democrat would have had zero chance to win the south and a black Republican would not have done well in the primaries, but I can't see any large scale white flight to Clinton. At worst, those voters would have gone to Perot, and Powell would have easily been able to attract enough moderates from Clinton to make up the difference. Powell would have done better than Dole, but not enough to win the election.
States in green are Powell's pickups over Dole.
Logged
“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
Clinton Lee Scott
Read
Fat Man on a Diet
, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
opebo
YaBB God
Posts: 44664
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #5 on:
October 06, 2004, 10:33:33 pm »
Quote from: AG Ernest on October 06, 2004, 10:21:55 pm
Quote from: opebo on October 06, 2004, 10:09:58 pm
I'm not sure there would have been much of an ideological gap between these two. But Clinton would've won easily. Powell wouldn't get as many states as Dole, as places like Mississippi, South Carolina, etc, would've gone to Clinton.
What makes you think that the south wouldn't have been ready to vote for a black Republican in 1996? A black Democrat would have had zero chance to win the south and a black Republican would not have done well in the primaries, but I can't see any large scale white flight to Clinton. At worst, those voters would have gone to Perot, and Powell would have easily been able to attract enough moderates from Clinton to make up the difference. Powell would have done better than Dole, but not enough to win the election.
States in green are Powell's pickups over Dole.
Well, you may be right, but I was assuming a white flight to Clinton. I tend to assume a pretty high degree of racism in the South. But you may be right that they'd go for Perot - still that could give Clinton a plurality in some additional Southern states.
Logged
Quote from: opebo on December 17, 2012, 03:47:32 pm
prostitutes, bedpans, toupees etc.
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 21569
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #6 on:
October 06, 2004, 11:01:41 pm »
Quote from: opebo on October 06, 2004, 10:33:33 pm
Well, you may be right, but I was assuming a white flight to Clinton. I tend to assume a pretty high degree of racism in the South. But you may be right that they'd go for Perot - still that could give Clinton a plurality in some additional Southern states.
The only really close southern Republican state in the actual 1996 race was Georgia. However, the racist rednecks in general tend to believe in the America First trade protectionism that was a central theme of Perot, so a good part of those who might abandon the Republicans because of the race of their candidate already had.
Logged
“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
Clinton Lee Scott
Read
Fat Man on a Diet
, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68061
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #7 on:
October 06, 2004, 11:09:48 pm »
but keep in mind that Powell was pro-choice, and many of those southern Republicans are single issue abortion voters. Phillips would've done a lot better and would've picked up those voters. So Clinton could've picked up a few southern states.
Logged
Mr. Fresh
faulfrisch
YaBB God
Posts: 1634
Political Matrix
E: -0.45, S: 2.17
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #8 on:
October 06, 2004, 11:10:20 pm »
Quote from: AG Ernest on October 06, 2004, 11:01:41 pm
However, the racist rednecks in general tend to believe in the America First trade protectionism that was a central theme of Perot,
And you're calling them racist??
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Modadmin
YaBB God
Posts: 15110
Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #9 on:
October 06, 2004, 11:58:35 pm »
Quote from: Mr. Fresh on October 06, 2004, 11:10:20 pm
Quote from: AG Ernest on October 06, 2004, 11:01:41 pm
However, the racist rednecks in general tend to believe in the America First trade protectionism that was a central theme of Perot,
And you're calling them racist??
He said "the racist rednecks". That doesn't mean that all rednecks are racist; he's just talking about a certain group of rednecks, not all inclusive.
Logged
Vincent
azpol76
Sr. Member
Posts: 440
Political Matrix
E: 0.88, S: -2.26
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #10 on:
October 07, 2004, 12:04:08 am »
Quote from: BRTD on October 06, 2004, 11:09:48 pm
but keep in mind that Powell was pro-choice, and many of those southern Republicans are single issue abortion voters. Phillips would've done a lot better and would've picked up those voters. So Clinton could've picked up a few southern states.
With a pro-choice Republican there probably would be a significant pro-life third party candidate. Perhaps Keyes or Buchanan(and I dont think he would run on a "safe-states" stratagey in this scenario.)
Logged
Mr. Fresh
faulfrisch
YaBB God
Posts: 1634
Political Matrix
E: -0.45, S: 2.17
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #11 on:
October 07, 2004, 12:28:38 am »
Quote from: SCJ Nym90 on October 06, 2004, 11:58:35 pm
Quote from: Mr. Fresh on October 06, 2004, 11:10:20 pm
Quote from: AG Ernest on October 06, 2004, 11:01:41 pm
However, the racist rednecks in general tend to believe in the America First trade protectionism that was a central theme of Perot,
And you're calling them racist??
He said "the racist rednecks". That doesn't mean that all rednecks are racist; he's just talking about a certain group of rednecks, not all inclusive.
...I know what he said, but they way he said it "rednecks." Sounded kind of funny when he said the "racist rednecks." What the heck is he doing? Complimenting them? No, that's degrading those people, so that's why I said:
And you're calling them racist?
Logged
Bro-mentum
tomm_86
YaBB God
Posts: 1148
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #12 on:
October 07, 2004, 05:48:31 am »
Quote from: Mr. Fresh on October 07, 2004, 12:28:38 am
Quote from: SCJ Nym90 on October 06, 2004, 11:58:35 pm
Quote from: Mr. Fresh on October 06, 2004, 11:10:20 pm
Quote from: AG Ernest on October 06, 2004, 11:01:41 pm
However, the racist rednecks in general tend to believe in the America First trade protectionism that was a central theme of Perot,
And you're calling them racist??
He said "the racist rednecks". That doesn't mean that all rednecks are racist; he's just talking about a certain group of rednecks, not all inclusive.
...I know what he said, but they way he said it "rednecks." Sounded kind of funny when he said the "racist rednecks." What the heck is he doing? Complimenting them? No, that's degrading those people, so that's why I said:
And you're calling them racist?
He should've been clearer, I doubt he meant to generalize a huge group of people, at least I hope he didnt...
Logged
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 21569
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #13 on:
October 07, 2004, 07:23:25 pm »
There are both racist rednecks and non-racist rednecks. There also plenty of racist Yankees, so the south is hardly the only place where the color of Powell's skin would cost him votes for no good reason.
Logged
“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
Clinton Lee Scott
Read
Fat Man on a Diet
, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
NYGOP
nygop
Full Member
Posts: 143
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #14 on:
October 07, 2004, 07:43:27 pm »
I'd vote POwell
Logged
PBrunsel
YaBB God
Posts: 9644
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #15 on:
October 07, 2004, 09:07:37 pm »
My map (and I amy be too nice to General Powell):
Bill Clinton/Al Gore: 314
Colin Powell/Orrin Hatch: 224
Logged
"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68061
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #16 on:
October 07, 2004, 09:18:40 pm »
I don't think Powell would be stupid enough to run with Hatch.
Logged
PBrunsel
YaBB God
Posts: 9644
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #17 on:
October 07, 2004, 09:54:34 pm »
Quote from: BRTD on October 07, 2004, 09:18:40 pm
I don't think Powell would be stupid enough to run with Hatch.
I originaly had Pete Wilson as his running mate when I wrote it down, but wasn't he sick in 1996 so he had to drop out of the Republican Primary?
Logged
"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
PBrunsel
YaBB God
Posts: 9644
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #18 on:
October 07, 2004, 10:24:38 pm »
I ran this on President Forver, not what I expected to say the least:
Bill Clinton/Al Gore: 345 Electoral Votes; 48% of the popular vote
Colin Powell/Orian Hatch: 193 Electoral Votes; 40% of the popular vote
Ross Perot/Pat Choate: 0 Electoral Votes; 9% of the popular vote
Harry browne/Jo Jorgensen: 0 Electoral votes; 1% of the popular vote
Logged
"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68061
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #19 on:
October 08, 2004, 12:00:05 am »
Kemp would be a good running mate for him as well, except isn't Powell from New York as well? Of course they would have no chance at winning New York anyway, so being ineligible for the EVs wouldn't be an issue.
Otherwise I think Powell would want a conservative on the ticket to balance it out but not an extremist to scare off potential voters. So I'd bet on a conservative but not extremist senator from a swing state.
Logged
PBrunsel
YaBB God
Posts: 9644
Re: Powell v. Clinton - 1996
«
Reply #20 on:
October 08, 2004, 09:41:11 am »
Quote from: BRTD on October 08, 2004, 12:00:05 am
Kemp would be a good running mate for him as well, except isn't Powell from New York as well? Of course they would have no chance at winning New York anyway, so being ineligible for the EVs wouldn't be an issue.
Otherwise I think Powell would want a conservative on the ticket to balance it out but not an extremist to scare off potential voters. So I'd bet on a conservative but not extremist senator from a swing state.
Like Jim Talent
Logged
"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...