Mark Sanford goes missing (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 03:33:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Mark Sanford goes missing (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Mark Sanford goes missing  (Read 15499 times)
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« on: June 24, 2009, 11:20:12 AM »

I also question why, if his vacation was innocent, he instructed his staff to lie and say he was "hiking the Appalachian trail."

I wouldn't say that the fact his staff said he was hiking on the Appalachian trail is any evidence of a cover-up.  In fact, I'd say the timing of the announcement seems to indicate that it wasn't a cover-up; if he had instructed his staff to say so, they would've told people as soon as it was clear this was a political story, and people would've in general shrugged their shoulders and said "oh, that crazy Sanford!" and went about their business.  Rather, I think some staffer recalled Sanford saying something about wanting to hike the Appalachian Trail (as he said he was considering doing before he decided last minute to go to Buenos Aires Huh), told his superiors, and they decided that the info was credible enough that that was the story they were going to roll with.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2009, 01:57:13 PM »

Take out the whole "it was an affair" thing and it seems like a decent romantic comedy could be made out of this entire situation.

"What started as innocent emails between a southern gentleman and an exotic Argentinian tango dancer... soon become the love of a lifetime.  The Appalachian Trail.  Coming to theaters Fall 2010."
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2009, 06:22:09 PM »
« Edited: June 24, 2009, 06:24:36 PM by ilikeverin »

From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/24/AR2009062403062_2.html?sid=ST2009062403065

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Overall decent prose, though the "hey, that's getting into sexual details" obviously completely breaks the mood.  Uses most "SAT-level-words" appropriately though his "digression" isn't really a digression, per se; a couple typos but since the medium is email those can be excused somewhat.  However, he does a good job of trodding over familiar ground ("You're hot, girl.") while still avoiding some of the worst cliches, and making sure to compliment her personality as much as her looks (and her looks without being crass or juvenile).

Full story: http://www.thestate.com/sanford/story/839350.html

Too lazy to critique it all atm, but goodness it gets a bit worse when read verbatim rather than just extracts.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.