Regional Voting Patterns, 1964-2008
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:28:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Regional Voting Patterns, 1964-2008
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Regional Voting Patterns, 1964-2008  (Read 4390 times)
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 23, 2009, 11:30:49 PM »

New England (Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island)

1964
Johnson (D) - 72.91%
Goldwater (R) - 27.09%

1968
Humphrey (D) - 57.25%
Nixon (R) - 38.55%
Wallace (AI) - 4.20%

1972
Nixon (R) - 52.93%
McGovern (D) - 47.07%

1976
Carter (D) - 52.98%
Ford (R) - 47.02%

1980
Reagan (R) - 45.28%
Carter (D) - 40.85%
Anderson (I) - 13.87%

1984
Reagan (R) - 56.41%
Mondale (D) - 43.59%

1988
Bush (R) - 50.08%
Dukakis (D) - 49.92%

1992
Clinton (D) - 44.68%
Bush (R) - 31.87%
Perot (Ref) - 23.45%

1996
Clinton (D) - 57.99%
Dole (R) - 31.69%
Perot (Ref) - 10.32%

2000
Gore (D) - 56.86%
Bush (R) - 37.44%
Nader (G) - 5.70%

2004
Kerry (D) - 58.58%
Bush (R) - 41.42%

2008
Obama (D) - 61.77%
McCain (R) - 38.23%
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2009, 11:34:41 PM »

Awesome.  Keep it up Smiley
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2009, 11:43:07 PM »

Deep South (South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas)

1964
Goldwater (R) - 59.62%
Johnson (D) - 40.38%

1968
Wallace (AI) - 49.38%
Humphrey (D) - 25.85%
Nixon (R) - 24.77%

1972
Nixon (R) - 73.27%
McGovern (D) - 26.73%

1976
Carter (D) - 58.68%
Ford (R) - 41.32%

1980
Carter (D) - 49.83%
Reagan (R) - 48.35%
Anderson (I) - 1.82%

1984
Reagan (R) - 61.53%
Mondale (D) - 38.47%

1988
Bush (R) - 59.00%
Dukakis (D) - 41.00%

1992
Bush (R) - 44.40%
Clinton (D) - 44.00%
Perot (Ref) - 11.60%

1996
Clinton (D) - 47.45%
Dole (R) - 46.08%
Perot (Ref) - 6.48%

2000
Bush (R) - 55.46%
Gore (D) - 43.27%
Nader (G) - 1.27%

2004
Bush (R) - 58.83%
Kerry (D) - 41.17%

2008
McCain (R) - 56.51%
Obama (D) - 43.49%
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2009, 12:18:24 AM »

Unfortunately not much variation here - whoever wins California wins the region, for obvious reasons.

West Coast (Washington, Oregon, California)

1964
Johnson (D) - 60.02%
Goldwater (R) - 39.98%

1968
Nixon (R) - 47.91%
Humphrey (D) - 45.28%
Wallace (AI) - 6.80%

1972
Nixon (R) - 55.38%
McGovern (D) - 41.46%
Schmitz (AI) - 3.16%

1976
Ford (R) - 51.00%
Carter (D) - 49.00%

1980
Reagan (R) - 53.28%
Carter (D) - 37.45%
Anderson (I) - 9.27%

1984
Reagan (R) - 57.77%
Mondale (D) - 42.23%

1988
Bush (R) - 51.05%
Dukakis (D) - 48.95%

1992
Clinton (D) - 45.62%
Bush (R) - 32.76%
Perot (Ref) - 21.62%

1996
Clinton (D) - 52.54%
Dole (R) - 39.69%
Perot (Ref) - 7.77%

2000
Gore (D) - 52.84%
Bush (R) - 43.12%
Nader (G) - 4.04%

2004
Kerry (D) - 54.49%
Bush (R) - 45.51%

2008
Obama (D) - 61.32%
McCain (R) - 38.68%
Logged
the artist formerly known as catmusic
catmusic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,180
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.16, S: -7.91

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2009, 12:44:16 AM »

great job. this is interesting.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2009, 03:08:15 AM »

Unfortunately not much variation here - whoever wins California wins the region, for obvious reasons.

You could do weighted averaging.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2009, 09:08:30 AM »

Is Arkansas generally considered to be part of the Deep South? I've usually just seen it defined as the line of states from South Carolina to Louisiana.

Obviously southern Arkansas could well be considered part of this region, but most people probably wouldn't say that Wal-Mart's headquarters is in the Deep South.

But keep up the good work!
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2009, 08:03:43 PM »

Is Arkansas generally considered to be part of the Deep South? I've usually just seen it defined as the line of states from South Carolina to Louisiana.

Obviously southern Arkansas could well be considered part of this region, but most people probably wouldn't say that Wal-Mart's headquarters is in the Deep South.

But keep up the good work!

I was thinking about that as well, but, if you think about it, Arkansas has tended to vote with Alabama and Mississippi more often than Tennessee or Virginia.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 24, 2009, 08:06:25 PM »

I mean, you have to go back further than this to really see the trend, but chances are, if there is any break in the Southern vote, Arkansas is breaking for the Deep South and not the Upper South.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 24, 2009, 08:52:10 PM »

Interesting tidbits of information here.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2009, 02:27:23 AM »

Unfortunately not much variation here - whoever wins California wins the region, for obvious reasons.

You could do weighted averaging.

True, but I don't think that would change any result other than 1988.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,157
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2009, 04:10:34 AM »

New England (Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island)

1964
Johnson (D) - 72.91%
Goldwater (R) - 27.09%

1968
Humphrey (D) - 57.25%
Nixon (R) - 38.55%
Wallace (AI) - 4.20%

1972
Nixon (R) - 52.93%
McGovern (D) - 47.07%

1976
Carter (D) - 52.98%
Ford (R) - 47.02%

1980
Reagan (R) - 45.28%
Carter (D) - 40.85%
Anderson (I) - 13.87%

1984
Reagan (R) - 56.41%
Mondale (D) - 43.59%

1988
Bush (R) - 50.08%
Dukakis (D) - 49.92%

1992
Clinton (D) - 44.68%
Bush (R) - 31.87%
Perot (Ref) - 23.45%

1996
Clinton (D) - 57.99%
Dole (R) - 31.69%
Perot (Ref) - 10.32%

2000
Gore (D) - 56.86%
Bush (R) - 37.44%
Nader (G) - 5.70%

2004
Kerry (D) - 58.58%
Bush (R) - 41.42%

2008
Obama (D) - 61.77%
McCain (R) - 38.23%

I did a map sometimes ago about presidential election results in New England since 1824. Here is it :



Green being Whig, yellow Progressive, orange Southerner and grey "others".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 11 queries.