Adding the GM Bill (Withdrawn)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 11, 2024, 04:04:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Adding the GM Bill (Withdrawn)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Adding the GM Bill (Withdrawn)  (Read 2545 times)
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 28, 2009, 09:12:06 PM »
« edited: July 07, 2009, 07:06:35 PM by Senator MasterJedi, PPT »

Adding the GM Bill

Article VIII, Section 2 of the Atlasian Constitution shall hereby include the following as Clause 6:

6. The position of Game Moderator is established to provide frequent and timely updates to the President, Senate and people of Atlasia on the foreign and domestic events as they occur.

The GM shall be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
The GM shall serve at the pleasure of the President and the Senate and may be dismissed by the President or removed by a two-thirds vote of the Senate.

Spon: Sen. PurpleState
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,191
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2009, 10:56:07 PM »

     I like this bill.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2009, 11:00:09 PM »

The one Dan and I wrote is much better. Wink
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2009, 11:01:48 PM »


I don't doubt it. I just wanted a quick way to get it into the Constitution with a viable legal framework. I have never really believed in the lame duck session being all that lame, especially when I'm not the one leaving office.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2009, 12:06:24 AM »

Isn't this a constitutional amendment, not a bill?
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2009, 08:02:24 AM »

Isn't this a constitutional amendment, not a bill?

The amendment is called "Adding the GM Bill".
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2009, 06:54:39 PM »


I don't doubt it. I just wanted a quick way to get it into the Constitution with a viable legal framework. I have never really believed in the lame duck session being all that lame, especially when I'm not the one leaving office.

On further consideration, I think you are right that this needs to be in the Constitution. Indeed some of this the same like the 2/3's requirement.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2009, 08:13:09 PM »

Isn't this a constitutional amendment, not a bill?

It is technically an amendment, but it is in a part of the Constitution (Article VII, Section 2) that can be added as though by statute.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2009, 06:12:10 PM »

Shall we bring this to a final vote tonight?
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2009, 06:12:56 PM »

Shall we bring this to a final vote tonight?

That's what I've been planning on doing. Smiley
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2009, 09:29:56 PM »

I hereby open up a final vote on this bill. Please vote Aye, Nay or Abstain.


Aye
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2009, 09:40:39 PM »

AYE
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 01, 2009, 09:50:48 PM »

Aye
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2009, 10:01:33 PM »

Nay (Can't we have more time to debate these things? Shoving important legislation to circumvent a loss in court right at the end of a legislative session is pretty low. Also, I don't like the fact that this amends the constitution via a Senate measure. Not only is legality questionable, but this is an important matter than we should deal with with more time.)
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2009, 10:03:18 PM »

Nay (Can't we have more time to debate these things? Shoving important legislation to circumvent a loss in court right at the end of a legislative session is pretty low. Also, I don't like the fact that this amends the constitution via a Senate measure. Not only is legality questionable, but this is an important matter than we should deal with with more time.)

You had 3 days and said nothing. And there was no real debate between actual Senators and in over a day too.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 01, 2009, 10:07:06 PM »

Nay (Can't we have more time to debate these things? Shoving important legislation to circumvent a loss in court right at the end of a legislative session is pretty low. Also, I don't like the fact that this amends the constitution via a Senate measure. Not only is legality questionable, but this is an important matter than we should deal with with more time.)

Then where have you been when the debating period was open? I didn't attempt to force it through. No one had any questions so I assumed it was generally agreed upon.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,191
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 01, 2009, 10:08:00 PM »

     Aye
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,981


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2009, 06:35:39 PM »

I must say that I'm uncomfortable with essentially amending the constitution with a Senate bill, even it may technically be legal.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2009, 06:37:24 PM »

I must say that I'm uncomfortable with essentially amending the constitution with a Senate bill, even it may technically be legal.

This isn't on the floor anymore. This was the last senate.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,981


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 07, 2009, 06:40:05 PM »

https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Current_Senate_Rules%2C_Regulations%2C_and_Procedures#Article_9:_Transitionary_Arrangements

I don't think so, unless the Wiki is out of date (or I'm reading it wrong).
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 07, 2009, 06:42:53 PM »


Didn't even know about that, besides the fact that its never been followed as far as I know. PS didn't want to re-introduce it so we'll just go with that he withdrew it and no one sponsored it in time.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,981


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 07, 2009, 06:43:51 PM »

Alright, it's not really a big deal, as I see there's another bill on the GM currently on the floor.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 07, 2009, 06:45:27 PM »


Didn't even know about that, besides the fact that its never been followed as far as I know. PS didn't want to re-introduce it so we'll just go with that he withdrew it and no one sponsored it in time.

Since PS co-sponsored and help me craft mine, I assume that he intended to not continue with this one.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 07, 2009, 07:02:13 PM »

Yes, I have withdrawn this from the floor.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 11 queries.