Which country is the biggest threat to the U.S. or its interests?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:36:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Which country is the biggest threat to the U.S. or its interests?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: Which one?
#1
North Korea
 
#2
Iran
 
#3
Afghanistan
 
#4
Pakistan
 
#5
Israel
 
#6
Other - specify.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 55

Author Topic: Which country is the biggest threat to the U.S. or its interests?  (Read 6545 times)
GMantis
Dessie Potter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,975
Bulgaria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: July 09, 2009, 01:59:52 AM »

It's Saudi Arabia that's actually most responsible for terrorism. Israel also exercises undue influence on American foreign policy, greatly contributes to anti-American feelings in the Middle East and is therefore indirectly a rather significant threat.
Russia is not a threat to the US. If, however, it's an American interest that all formerly Communist countries are American satelite states, the Russia is certainly a threat to US interests.

Should those states become again russian satellites ? Russia is maybe not a threat for USA, just a threat for freedom.
Russia is not a threat to freedom in neighbouring countries. However, NATO expansion is a threat to Russia.
Frankly, I'm not certain about other Eastern European countries, but when it was a Soviet satelite, Bulgaria had a more independent foreign policy than now. Nor were there any Soviet bases here and Bulgaria wasn't forced to participate in the Soviet war in Afghanistan.

The people of some eastern-european countries voted. They voted and elected leaders that, being wrong or right - that's not the question -, decided that the best interests for their country was to join the NATO and to follow the American foreign policies whatever they do. I don't like NATO, and consider it as useless since USSR is dead, but Russia hasn't any right to intervent in those country and tell them what they should do. Georgia, Ukraina, etc... are supposed to be free countries. They are free to join the NATO if they want so, and Russia has nothing to say about it.
So, yes, Russia is a threat for the freedom of many eastern-european countries, and above all, it is a threat for the freedom of russian people.
Many countries want to join the EU, but they're not in the EU, are they? It's up to NATO and NATO expansion is harmful to both NATO and its member states. Russia has no influence in Eastern European countries now, while a lot of those countries basically are an extension of the US as far as foreign policy is concerned, even if this is not popular in those countries (for example, 70% of Ukrainians are against NATO membership).
Also, for next Ukrainian elections, a candidate will run saying "I'm against NATO", and if the opinion doesn't change and NATO is the only issue, then he will get 70% of the vote. That's what we call "democracy" and that's not the same that Russia invading a country to prevent it joining the NATO.
Which country did Russia invade to stop it from joining NATO?
Did you ever hear about Georgia ?
You mean the country whose foolish leader invaded a territory under Russian protection? I don't think any other country would do such a thing again or would have an opportunity to do so, for that matter.
Did you ever look at a map ? Which state does Sothern Ossetia belong to ? Russia, maybe ? If Sakashvili is a war criminal, then he should be judged by the International Tribunal. But Russia has absolutely no right to invade Georgia because it doesn't like Sakashvili's policies.
Yes, but I think they have a rather good right to invade Georgia if it invades a region guarded with Russian peacekeepers and with 90% Russian citizens.
Do you know what is national sovereignty ? Well, that's not a moral principle, but when a country invades another without any international common decision, the correct word is "imperialism".
Leaving aside the fact that Georgia's sovereignity over South Ossetia is rather doubtful as according to the Soviet Constitution autonomous areas have the right to leave their republics and South Ossetia did just that, attacking peacekeepers and citizens of another nation is millitary aggression, making it quite right for Russia to respond. I might add that Georgia was not all behaving like it was regaining its own territory considering the attack with Grad rockets on civilian population as well the general behaviour of their army in South Ossetia.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,081
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: July 09, 2009, 09:14:14 AM »

It's Saudi Arabia that's actually most responsible for terrorism. Israel also exercises undue influence on American foreign policy, greatly contributes to anti-American feelings in the Middle East and is therefore indirectly a rather significant threat.
Russia is not a threat to the US. If, however, it's an American interest that all formerly Communist countries are American satelite states, the Russia is certainly a threat to US interests.

Should those states become again russian satellites ? Russia is maybe not a threat for USA, just a threat for freedom.
Russia is not a threat to freedom in neighbouring countries. However, NATO expansion is a threat to Russia.
Frankly, I'm not certain about other Eastern European countries, but when it was a Soviet satelite, Bulgaria had a more independent foreign policy than now. Nor were there any Soviet bases here and Bulgaria wasn't forced to participate in the Soviet war in Afghanistan.

The people of some eastern-european countries voted. They voted and elected leaders that, being wrong or right - that's not the question -, decided that the best interests for their country was to join the NATO and to follow the American foreign policies whatever they do. I don't like NATO, and consider it as useless since USSR is dead, but Russia hasn't any right to intervent in those country and tell them what they should do. Georgia, Ukraina, etc... are supposed to be free countries. They are free to join the NATO if they want so, and Russia has nothing to say about it.
So, yes, Russia is a threat for the freedom of many eastern-european countries, and above all, it is a threat for the freedom of russian people.
Many countries want to join the EU, but they're not in the EU, are they? It's up to NATO and NATO expansion is harmful to both NATO and its member states. Russia has no influence in Eastern European countries now, while a lot of those countries basically are an extension of the US as far as foreign policy is concerned, even if this is not popular in those countries (for example, 70% of Ukrainians are against NATO membership).
Also, for next Ukrainian elections, a candidate will run saying "I'm against NATO", and if the opinion doesn't change and NATO is the only issue, then he will get 70% of the vote. That's what we call "democracy" and that's not the same that Russia invading a country to prevent it joining the NATO.
Which country did Russia invade to stop it from joining NATO?
Did you ever hear about Georgia ?
You mean the country whose foolish leader invaded a territory under Russian protection? I don't think any other country would do such a thing again or would have an opportunity to do so, for that matter.
Did you ever look at a map ? Which state does Sothern Ossetia belong to ? Russia, maybe ? If Sakashvili is a war criminal, then he should be judged by the International Tribunal. But Russia has absolutely no right to invade Georgia because it doesn't like Sakashvili's policies.
Yes, but I think they have a rather good right to invade Georgia if it invades a region guarded with Russian peacekeepers and with 90% Russian citizens.
Do you know what is national sovereignty ? Well, that's not a moral principle, but when a country invades another without any international common decision, the correct word is "imperialism".
Leaving aside the fact that Georgia's sovereignity over South Ossetia is rather doubtful as according to the Soviet Constitution autonomous areas have the right to leave their republics and South Ossetia did just that, attacking peacekeepers and citizens of another nation is millitary aggression, making it quite right for Russia to respond. I might add that Georgia was not all behaving like it was regaining its own territory considering the attack with Grad rockets on civilian population as well the general behaviour of their army in South Ossetia.
Even if the end were really to free the Ossetians from the Georgian oppression and not only to serve russian geopolitical interests, it would never justify the means of the invasion of a free country. That's the United Nations' job, certainly not Russia's.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: July 09, 2009, 09:18:18 AM »


Do you know what is national sovereignty ? Well, that's not a moral principle, but when a country invades another without any international common decision, the correct word is "imperialism".
Which is exactly what Georgia did, South Ossetia having been de facto independent for more than a decade.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,081
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: July 09, 2009, 09:25:58 AM »


Do you know what is national sovereignty ? Well, that's not a moral principle, but when a country invades another without any international common decision, the correct word is "imperialism".
Which is exactly what Georgia did, South Ossetia having been de facto independent for more than a decade.

Read my previous post please, Russia is not United Nations.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: July 18, 2009, 01:13:27 AM »

It's incredible that more people have answered Israel as opposed to Iran.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: July 18, 2009, 01:52:52 AM »

It's incredible that more people have answered Israel as opposed to Iran.

In what way can Iran possibly threaten the United States?
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: July 18, 2009, 03:28:55 AM »

Look for the left's response to any thread over the past five years asking if we should invade Iran.
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: July 18, 2009, 04:19:28 AM »

China.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: July 19, 2009, 12:21:14 AM »

Pakistan, Armed and Unbalanced.

North Korea, we can blow to bits instantly if we wanted to.

For you people that said Israel is more dangerous then Iran: SHAME, just shame.
Logged
Governor PiT
Robert Stark
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,631
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: July 19, 2009, 04:37:46 PM »

It's incredible that more people have answered Israel as opposed to Iran.

Pawned!
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: July 19, 2009, 05:09:39 PM »

Why are Israel and Afghanistan listed?

North Korea is the biggest threat.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 13 queries.