how densely populated is your town/city?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 04:40:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  how densely populated is your town/city?		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: how densely populated is your town/city?  (Read 3977 times)
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: July 10, 2009, 05:57:10 PM »
6,451, although some of the 2.3 square miles is Meadowlands swamp.  I'd say inhabitable land makes up only about 1.5-1.8 sq miles
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: July 10, 2009, 07:10:16 PM »
2,466.6 per sq. mi.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: July 10, 2009, 07:15:25 PM »
2,571.8 per sq. mile
Logged
Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese
JOHN91043353
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,570
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: July 10, 2009, 07:24:40 PM »

3,910.9 per sq mile (Hässleholm)
7,896.9 per sq mile (Lund)
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: July 10, 2009, 07:38:12 PM »
Only like 850 people/sq. mile, but the vast majority of the city is government owned (federal, state, local buildings, a university, an airport)  the city is only 16 sq. miles... and another chunk of it is protected wetland, so really the city is pretty typical of a smaller town... the vast majority of the houses were constructed before 1940... with some post WWII houses on the north end, but we also haven't annexed very much land, so while the surrounding townships and tripled in population in the past 40 years, the city itself is about the same size.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: July 10, 2009, 07:47:20 PM »
2,223 per square mile
Logged
pogo stick
JewishConservative
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,429
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: July 10, 2009, 09:18:40 PM »
2nd fastest growing city in America.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: July 10, 2009, 09:20:26 PM »
Canberra: 1005/km2 (roughly 2600/m2?)
Melbourne: 1566/km2 (4000/m2?)

Both higher in the areas I live in in each, particularly Port Melbourne, which from memory is about 3500/km2 (8800/m2?)
Logged
Devilman88
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,498


Political Matrix
E: 5.94, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: July 10, 2009, 11:00:44 PM »
 2,377
 
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: July 10, 2009, 11:06:21 PM »
1,966 (...total)

The closest thing you could really call a town. (Pomeroy, Ohio)
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: July 10, 2009, 11:08:03 PM »
10,721
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: July 10, 2009, 11:09:31 PM »
Quote from: Senator Marokai Blue on July 10, 2009, 11:06:21 PM
1,966 (...total)

The closest thing you could really call a town. (Pomeroy, Ohio)

"607.5 people per square mile (234.3/km)"
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: July 10, 2009, 11:16:04 PM »
Quote from: Senator Marokai Blue on July 10, 2009, 11:09:31 PM
Quote from: Senator Marokai Blue on July 10, 2009, 11:06:21 PM
1,966 (...total)

The closest thing you could really call a town. (Pomeroy, Ohio)

"607.5 people per square mile (234.3/km)"

And, at the risk of spamming, for my entire county it's only 54 people per mile.
Logged
Hyperfast
Rookie
**
Posts: 92
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: July 10, 2009, 11:41:16 PM »
452.3
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: July 11, 2009, 12:01:35 AM »
2327/sq mi
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,624
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: July 11, 2009, 12:24:39 AM »
22.8/ sq mi

I win?
Logged
the artist formerly known as catmusic
catmusic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,180
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.16, S: -7.91

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: July 11, 2009, 02:58:19 AM »
I just found out. 173.2/sq mi. Total population of 3,728.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,406
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: July 11, 2009, 07:25:11 AM »
City: 305.4/km2
Metro Area: 219.8/km2
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: July 11, 2009, 07:53:54 AM »
Plant City, Florida : 1,317.8/sq mi
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: July 11, 2009, 08:32:53 AM »

That'd be Phil. I take silver, Lewis gets Bronze Cheesy
Logged
Sewer
SpaceCommunistMutant
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: July 11, 2009, 08:38:40 AM »
4,865.3/sq mi (767.2/km2)
Logged
Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,705
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: July 11, 2009, 08:39:04 AM »
Dublin: 4,304 persons per square kilometre
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: July 11, 2009, 08:45:33 AM »
No obviously you live in bumblefuck nowhere and therefore lose big time
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: July 11, 2009, 08:54:28 AM »
this week?

15,601.2/km2 (40,406.9/sq mi)
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,747
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: July 11, 2009, 09:04:09 AM »
Quote from: DownWithTheLeft on July 11, 2009, 08:45:33 AM
No obviously you live in bumblefuck nowhere and therefore lose big time
This coming from the guy who lives in New Jersey.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 13 queries.