2010 house predictions (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:34:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election Predictions (Moderator: muon2)
  2010 house predictions (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How many seats will the GOP have?
#1
<170
 
#2
171-180
 
#3
181-217
 
#4
218-230
 
#5
>231
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 69

Author Topic: 2010 house predictions  (Read 28598 times)
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,943


« on: July 17, 2009, 10:17:14 PM »

I think they'll get a net of maybe +10 or so seats. Luckily, most of the losses will be Blue Dogs and DLC types, which shouldn't really slow down the Democratic agenda that much.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,943


« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2009, 11:43:22 PM »

Oddly enough, with Kirk, Castle, Gerlach, Justice, McHugh, etc. the Democrats are favored for the open-seat pickups thus far.  The GOP, of course, has more low-hanging fruit like Minnick, and I can only think of Melancon for them in open-seats...  am I missing anyone?  There are plenty of open seats in non-competitive districts like two in Kansas and whatnot, but just looking at opposite-party or purple districts.

NH-02 (Hodes) and PA-07 (Sestak) are possible, I suppose, but the GOP would be swimming against the current.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,943


« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2009, 04:33:06 AM »

I think that these town halls are serving as a warning to many house democrats - especially the blue dogs.  If they vote for a public option/universal healthcare/single-payer government run deal, there is going to be a gigantic reckoning that will cost democrats the house and add 6 senate seats for the republicans.  However, if the healthcare bill passes without the public option and many of the more problematic aspects in the house bill - several of them are going to be saved. 

Why would people vote against the Blue Dogs for voting for a bill with a provision (the public option) that enjoys widespread public support? "You passed something I like, I'm going to vote against you!" That's now how the world works.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,943


« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2009, 03:47:10 PM »

Er... pretty much every poll has shown majority (sometimes super-majority) support for a public option. Stop watching Fox, kid.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,943


« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2009, 09:19:46 PM »

I was making the point that the public option, the thing that supposedly is widely hated by Americans is unpopular. It's not. At all. The Democratic health care bill (which doesn't even exist) is somewhat unpopular at the moment, but that's because 1) It doesn't exist, so it can't really be defined positively and 2) A lot of Republican scaremongering has been going on and the Democrats have only begun to refute it.

Also, if you think that "amnesty" (again, please use big people words instead of Fox/Limbaugh buzz words) is going to lose Democrats votes, obviously you weren't paying attention in 2006 or 2008. Immigration reform will help Democrats: Republicans have never won elections running on the issue, as it does not carry the same sort of weight as abortion or gay marriage or something AND the debate will give the Republicans another chance to alienate Hispanics.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 14 queries.