Perot/Lamm vs. Richards/Conrad vs. Baker/Pataki (1996)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:40:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Perot/Lamm vs. Richards/Conrad vs. Baker/Pataki (1996)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Perot/Lamm vs. Richards/Conrad vs. Baker/Pataki (1996)  (Read 1090 times)
Historico
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 981
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 20, 2009, 09:15:50 PM »

Ok...Let's say Perot won in '92 on an incredibly narrow margin...



Ross Perot/James Stockdale: 272 Electoral Votes
Bill Clinton/Al Gore: 203 Electoral Votes
George H.W. Bush/Dan Quayle: 63 Electoral Votes

******************

By the time of his reelection, Perot's 1st term can be only summed up as disastorus, as his frequent congressional showdown's, protectionist trade policies and Isolationist views, Make him very vulnerable come the '96 Election. The Reform Party decides to renominate their stubborn leader, who picks former Democratic Govenor Dick Lamm of Colorado as his running mate after VP Stockdale declined to seek renomination.

On the Democratic side, the Party of Jackson '96 election is theirs to loose. After defeating Phil Gramm during the '94 Texas Gubernatorial Election, Ann Richards sets her sights on the '96 election. Her down home Texas Charisma wins over voters in the South and Midwest, as well as her fairly liberal record as Governor makes her palatable to liberal Northeast. In order to weaken Reform/Republican strength in the Farm...Richards, the first female nominee for President by either Party, chose fiscally conservative Senator Kent Conrad of North Dakota as her running mate.

On the Republican Side, their dismal defeat during the '92 elections left the GOP in the Political wilderness. The race for the nomination showed a fractured party, as well as the convention as no candidate held the necessary amount of delegates to clinch the nomination. A Dark Horse in former Secretary of State James Baker was offered as a Compromise Candidate. The Fact that he was a Southern Conservative appealed to the Buchanan-backers in the hall while his foriegn policy achievments really spoke for themselves. In order to expand the party's base outside the South, Baker chose 1st term New York Governor George Pataki as his running mate.

So in this All-Texas Shoot Out...How does the electoral map turn out?
Logged
Historico
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 981
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2009, 09:32:29 AM »

Any takers?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2009, 12:27:46 PM »

I don't see Massachusetts going so eaisly for Perot, but otherwise 1992 map is ok

I think Perot would be ecletic and ineffective President with his all crazy, inconsistent ideas and lack of any base. Republicans still would be desorganized after taftesque 1992 results.

Probably Democratic year.
Logged
Historico
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 981
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2009, 07:52:35 PM »

Ok here we go...



Anne Richards/Kent Conrad: 344 Electoral Votes
James Baker/George Pataki: 144 Electoral Votes
Ross Perot/Dick Lamm: 50 Electoral Votes
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.