from ford to carter
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 04:39:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  from ford to carter
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: from ford to carter  (Read 3980 times)
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 14, 2007, 11:35:36 AM »

how many counties went from ford in 76 to carter in 80.

i think there were two in vermont.  if i recall correctly, vt was the only state that 'swung' to carter in 1980.  of course vt was starting on its journey into the abyss in those days.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,474
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2007, 11:51:07 AM »

Carter did not win Vermont in 1980.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 11:54:55 AM »


yes, but according the atlasians definition of 'swing'...it swung to him.

in other words his percentage of the two party vote increased in 1980 from 1976.
Logged
CPT MikeyMike
mikeymike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,513
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.58, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2007, 12:00:23 PM »


Correct however, Vermont was more competitive thanks to John Anderson running well in a few New England states like Maine and Vermont.

At a first glance.

Maine: Cumberland
Vermont: Chittenden
New York: Niagara, Monroe
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2007, 12:05:49 PM »

i dont understand flipping from ford to carter.   i know anderson was a factor..but i still dont get it.

who in their right mind said, 'you know, i wasnt sure about this carter fellow in 76, but he has done a helluva job and proved me wrong!'
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2007, 12:24:09 PM »

i dont understand flipping from ford to carter.   i know anderson was a factor..but i still dont get it.

who in their right mind said, 'you know, i wasnt sure about this carter fellow in 76, but he has done a helluva job and proved me wrong!'

There may have been a few Northern voters who were perhaps ancestrally Republican and wanted to vote for Ford in 1976 over Carter due to regionalism.  In 1980, Carter was a de-
regionalised candidate (demonstrated by his loss of every Southern state except Georgia) yet he may have won a few more Northern liberals because Reagan was a Western conservative Republican.  Of course, my argument falls flat if you consider the candidancy of John Anderson; remove him, however, and this is what could have happened.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2007, 02:52:04 PM »

i dont understand flipping from ford to carter.   i know anderson was a factor..but i still dont get it.

who in their right mind said, 'you know, i wasnt sure about this carter fellow in 76, but he has done a helluva job and proved me wrong!'

I feel the same way about Bush in '04.
Logged
gorkay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 995


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2007, 03:41:47 PM »

i dont understand flipping from ford to carter.   i know anderson was a factor..but i still dont get it.

who in their right mind said, 'you know, i wasnt sure about this carter fellow in 76, but he has done a helluva job and proved me wrong!'

I doubt anyone said that, but there may well have been some who said, "Carter has his faults, but I damn sure prefer him to that nut Reagan."
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2007, 04:18:20 PM »

i dont understand flipping from ford to carter.   i know anderson was a factor..but i still dont get it.

who in their right mind said, 'you know, i wasnt sure about this carter fellow in 76, but he has done a helluva job and proved me wrong!'

I doubt anyone said that, but there may well have been some who said, "Carter has his faults, but I damn sure prefer him to that nut Reagan."

in that case they should have voted anderson.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2007, 05:04:50 PM »

Vermont did in fact swing to Carter in 1976. It was a 7.35% swing from R to D, even though both parties lost ground (Reagan lost 9.97% compared to Ford, while Carter lost only 4.73%, thus the swing from R to D).
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,474
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2007, 07:24:17 PM »
« Edited: November 14, 2007, 07:31:46 PM by Eraserhead »


yes, but according the atlasians definition of 'swing'...it swung to him.

in other words his percentage of the two party vote increased in 1980 from 1976.

Alright. I got you. I guess I should come to this board more often to get the language down.
Logged
gorkay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 995


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2007, 01:31:43 PM »

i dont understand flipping from ford to carter.   i know anderson was a factor..but i still dont get it.

who in their right mind said, 'you know, i wasnt sure about this carter fellow in 76, but he has done a helluva job and proved me wrong!'

I doubt anyone said that, but there may well have been some who said, "Carter has his faults, but I damn sure prefer him to that nut Reagan."

in that case they should have voted anderson.

There were good reasons for not voting for Anderson as well.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 17, 2007, 08:35:07 PM »

Four of interest; Marquette, Washtenaw, Monroe, Niagara.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 17, 2007, 09:02:58 PM »

i dont understand flipping from ford to carter.   i know anderson was a factor..but i still dont get it.

who in their right mind said, 'you know, i wasnt sure about this carter fellow in 76, but he has done a helluva job and proved me wrong!'

Well, Reagan was a lot more conservative than Ford, so if someone votes strictly on ideology, it makes sense.

In Vermont and elsewhere in the Northeast. I'm sure a lot of moderate Rockefeller Republicans swung from Ford to Anderson. Some may well have gone from Ford to Carter since Carter was the only realistic chance to beat Reagan, and Reagan's conservative views turned them off.

Four of interest; Marquette, Washtenaw, Monroe, Niagara.

Washtenaw is easy to explain, since Ford was a U of Michigan alumnus. His Presidential library is there, and the school of Public Policy is named for him. Even despite its hard left swing in the last 20 years, Washtenaw always did and still does hold Ford in high esteem as its only alumnus to become President.

Marquette is a little bit more difficult to explain; the home state factor would be the easy answer, but even taking that into account, it was the only Michigan county outside Washtenaw to swing. My understanding of my home county is that while it is reasonably socially conservative it is not big on the "in your face" social conservatism of the Religious Right (lots of Lutherans up here, who while socially conservative on a personal level, tend to be pretty private about it, and don't like it infiltrating politics). So many of them may have been turned off by Carter's strong religiosity in 1976 and then by Reagan's strident social conservatism in 1980.

Plus it's a pretty heavy union area in general, as well as a University town, and both of those tended to show the least overall swing from Carter to Reagan. That combined with the home state factor in 1976 could've done the trick.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 23, 2010, 01:42:37 PM »

few more:

Grand Isle, VT; Grenada, MS; Franklin, MS; Marion, MS; Yazoo, MS
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2010, 08:58:53 PM »

The Mississippi counties flipping from Ford to Carter are really odd. I would think the South would've preferred Reagan to Ford, and also would've liked Carter a lot better in 1976 than in 1980.

It's actually quite surprising how well Ford did in MS in 1976. I'm assuming black turnout must've been horrid, and perhaps improved a bit by 1980? That could explain some of the flips.

Also, Reagan kicked off his campaign in MS if I recall, with a pretty explicit call for states' rights. 12 years after George Wallace's Presidential run, perhaps such words inspired blacks to turn out who had previously stayed home.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 25, 2010, 09:33:43 PM »

Yazoo is a majority-black county which narrowly voted for Bush twice and then for Obama (his percentage of the vote, 53%, is also the black population of the county).

Dunno about the others - all of them voted for McCain.  Presumably Ford didn't carry them by particularly substantial margins in 1976, though, and MS as a whole only swung to Reagan by a couple of points.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 26, 2010, 08:41:35 AM »

i dont understand flipping from ford to carter.   i know anderson was a factor..but i still dont get it.

who in their right mind said, 'you know, i wasnt sure about this carter fellow in 76, but he has done a helluva job and proved me wrong!'

I doubt anyone said that, but there may well have been some who said, "Carter has his faults, but I damn sure prefer him to that nut Reagan."

in that case they should have voted anderson.

Except it was clear near the end Anderson was going down in flames, causing a lot of such voters to hold their noses and cast ballots for Carter.
Logged
rbt48
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,060


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 27, 2010, 03:02:33 PM »
« Edited: April 27, 2010, 03:05:46 PM by rbt48 »

Vermont did in fact swing to Carter in 1976. It was a 7.35% swing from R to D, even though both parties lost ground (Reagan lost 9.97% compared to Ford, while Carter lost only 4.73%, thus the swing from R to D).
Vermont:  http://members.cox.net/rbt48/weather/Presidential_Elections/Vermont_pv.pdf
Mississippi:  http://members.cox.net/rbt48/weather/Presidential_Elections/Mississippi_pv.pdf

Regarding those Mississippi counties, the Voting Rights Act was a much greater factor by 1980 than it was in 1976.  Regarding the upstate New York counties, the state has a long history of favoring incumbent Presidents.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 04, 2010, 11:30:30 PM »

Hmm, was Vermont just a Ford type New England Republican state that drifted as they switched to democrats throughout the northeast?
Logged
Liberalrocks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,930
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 28, 2010, 11:08:57 PM »

i dont understand flipping from ford to carter.   i know anderson was a factor..but i still dont get it.

who in their right mind said, 'you know, i wasnt sure about this carter fellow in 76, but he has done a helluva job and proved me wrong!'

Well, Reagan was a lot more conservative than Ford, so if someone votes strictly on ideology, it makes sense.

In Vermont and elsewhere in the Northeast. I'm sure a lot of moderate Rockefeller Republicans swung from Ford to Anderson. Some may well have gone from Ford to Carter since Carter was the only realistic chance to beat Reagan, and Reagan's conservative views turned them off.

Four of interest; Marquette, Washtenaw, Monroe, Niagara.

Washtenaw is easy to explain, since Ford was a U of Michigan alumnus. His Presidential library is there, and the school of Public Policy is named for him. Even despite its hard left swing in the last 20 years, Washtenaw always did and still does hold Ford in high esteem as its only alumnus to become President.

Marquette is a little bit more difficult to explain; the home state factor would be the easy answer, but even taking that into account, it was the only Michigan county outside Washtenaw to swing. My understanding of my home county is that while it is reasonably socially conservative it is not big on the "in your face" social conservatism of the Religious Right (lots of Lutherans up here, who while socially conservative on a personal level, tend to be pretty private about it, and don't like it infiltrating politics). So many of them may have been turned off by Carter's strong religiosity in 1976 and then by Reagan's strident social conservatism in 1980.

Plus it's a pretty heavy union area in general, as well as a University town, and both of those tended to show the least overall swing from Carter to Reagan. That combined with the home state factor in 1976 could've done the trick.
I  would not have voted for Reagan ever!! but would have for  Ford for the reasons listed above. I would have had to decided if I was going to throw my vote away on Anderson or hold my nose for Carter
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.244 seconds with 12 queries.