Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-10-19

Map

Map

Adams	Casey	40.5%
	Scranton	58.4%
	Other	1.1%

Allegheny	Casey	56.6%
	Scranton	42.4%
	Other	1.1%

Armstrong	Casey	54.8%
	Scranton	44.2%
	Other	1.1%

Beaver	Casey	66.5%
	Scranton	32.6%
	Other	0.9%

Bedford	Casey	45.3%
	Scranton	53.9%
	Other	0.8%

Berks	Casey	44.6%
	Scranton	54.1%
	Other	1.3%

Blair	Casey	45.8%
	Scranton	53.0%
	Other	1.2%

Bradford	Casey	37.5%
	Scranton	61.5%
	Other	1.0%

Bucks	Casey	39.6%
	Scranton	59.3%
	Other	1.1%

Butler	Casey	46.7%
	Scranton	52.1%
	Other	1.2%

Cambria	Casey	69.0%
	Scranton	30.2%
	Other	0.8%

Cameron	Casey	46.9%
	Scranton	52.7%
	Other	0.4%

Carbon	Casey	56.7%
	Scranton	42.4%
	Other	0.9%

Centre	Casey	42.6%
	Scranton	56.5%
	Other	0.9%

Chester	Casey	32.5%
	Scranton	66.6%
	Other	0.9%

Clarion	Casey	47.7%
	Scranton	51.2%
	Other	1.2%

Clearfield	Casey	56.7%
	Scranton	42.7%
	Other	0.7%

Clinton	Casey	50.5%
	Scranton	48.5%
	Other	1.0%

Columbia	Casey	53.7%
	Scranton	45.7%
	Other	0.6%

Crawford	Casey	46.0%
	Scranton	53.2%
	Other	0.8%

Cumberland	Casey	36.8%
	Scranton	62.5%
	Other	0.7%

Dauphin	Casey	43.3%
	Scranton	56.0%
	Other	0.7%

Delaware	Casey	39.5%
	Scranton	59.7%
	Other	0.8%

Elk	Casey	60.4%
	Scranton	38.7%
	Other	0.9%

Erie	Casey	47.8%
	Scranton	50.3%
	Other	1.9%

Fayette	Casey	68.7%
	Scranton	30.3%
	Other	1.1%

Forest	Casey	45.2%
	Scranton	53.8%
	Other	1.0%

Franklin	Casey	38.8%
	Scranton	60.6%
	Other	0.6%

Fulton	Casey	47.1%
	Scranton	52.2%
	Other	0.7%

Greene	Casey	66.1%
	Scranton	33.2%
	Other	0.7%

Huntingdon	Casey	43.5%
	Scranton	55.6%
	Other	0.9%

Indiana	Casey	54.6%
	Scranton	44.5%
	Other	0.9%

Jefferson	Casey	48.8%
	Scranton	50.4%
	Other	0.9%

Juniata	Casey	44.2%
	Scranton	55.2%
	Other	0.6%

Lackawanna	Casey	67.5%
	Scranton	32.3%
	Other	0.2%

Lancaster	Casey	28.2%
	Scranton	71.0%
	Other	0.8%

Lawrence	Casey	60.6%
	Scranton	38.4%
	Other	1.0%

Lebanon	Casey	43.1%
	Scranton	56.1%
	Other	0.8%

Lehigh	Casey	43.9%
	Scranton	54.9%
	Other	1.1%

Luzerne	Casey	63.6%
	Scranton	35.8%
	Other	0.6%

Lycoming	Casey	46.8%
	Scranton	52.2%
	Other	1.0%

McKean	Casey	39.2%
	Scranton	59.8%
	Other	1.0%

Mercer	Casey	54.8%
	Scranton	44.0%
	Other	1.1%

Mifflin	Casey	44.3%
	Scranton	54.8%
	Other	0.9%

Monroe	Casey	45.4%
	Scranton	54.0%
	Other	0.6%

Montgomery	Casey	33.7%
	Scranton	65.4%
	Other	0.9%

Montour	Casey	52.6%
	Scranton	47.0%
	Other	0.4%

Northampton	Casey	51.0%
	Scranton	47.9%
	Other	1.1%

Northumberland	Casey	55.9%
	Scranton	43.3%
	Other	0.8%

Perry	Casey	38.4%
	Scranton	60.4%
	Other	1.3%

Philadelphia	Casey	63.3%
	Scranton	35.6%
	Other	1.1%

Pike	Casey	39.2%
	Scranton	60.1%
	Other	0.7%

Potter	Casey	45.6%
	Scranton	53.3%
	Other	1.1%

Schuylkill	Casey	51.6%
	Scranton	47.5%
	Other	0.9%

Snyder	Casey	34.1%
	Scranton	64.9%
	Other	1.1%

Somerset	Casey	54.9%
	Scranton	44.1%
	Other	1.0%

Sullivan	Casey	48.3%
	Scranton	51.1%
	Other	0.5%

Susquehanna	Casey	43.8%
	Scranton	55.7%
	Other	0.5%

Tioga	Casey	42.6%
	Scranton	56.3%
	Other	1.1%

Union	Casey	36.1%
	Scranton	62.7%
	Other	1.2%

Venango	Casey	49.3%
	Scranton	49.6%
	Other	1.2%

Warren	Casey	41.6%
	Scranton	57.4%
	Other	1.0%

Washington	Casey	61.3%
	Scranton	37.9%
	Other	0.8%

Wayne	Casey	45.7%
	Scranton	53.5%
	Other	0.9%

Westmoreland	Casey	60.3%
	Scranton	38.7%
	Other	1.0%

Wyoming	Casey	46.9%
	Scranton	52.4%
	Other	0.8%

York	Casey	39.4%
	Scranton	59.5%
	Other	1.0%

National DataGraph for 1986 - Pennsylvania Results for 1986

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved