1990 Gubernatorial Democratic Primary Election Data Graphs - Alabama
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2009-02-27

Map

AutaugaHubbert26.7%
 
Siegelman20.2%
 
James37.0%
 
Other16.1%
 


BaldwinHubbert26.9%
 
Siegelman31.6%
 
James32.3%
 
Other9.2%
 


BarbourHubbert33.1%
 
Siegelman19.9%
 
James26.9%
 
Other20.1%
 


BibbHubbert35.0%
 
Siegelman25.7%
 
James23.7%
 
Other15.6%
 


BlountHubbert32.6%
 
Siegelman24.0%
 
James19.5%
 
Other23.9%
 


BullockHubbert34.3%
 
Siegelman19.2%
 
James28.1%
 
Other18.4%
 


ButlerHubbert29.3%
 
Siegelman19.9%
 
James38.1%
 
Other12.7%
 


CalhounHubbert37.2%
 
Siegelman26.7%
 
James15.8%
 
Other20.3%
 


ChambersHubbert31.7%
 
Siegelman18.6%
 
James39.7%
 
Other10.1%
 


CherokeeHubbert33.0%
 
Siegelman20.7%
 
James12.5%
 
Other33.9%
 


ChiltonHubbert35.1%
 
Siegelman23.4%
 
James23.4%
 
Other18.1%
 


ChoctawHubbert36.8%
 
Siegelman33.0%
 
James18.2%
 
Other12.0%
 


ClarkeHubbert38.4%
 
Siegelman18.7%
 
James28.4%
 
Other14.5%
 


ClayHubbert32.1%
 
Siegelman21.7%
 
James21.2%
 
Other25.0%
 


CleburneHubbert36.7%
 
Siegelman22.3%
 
James20.0%
 
Other20.9%
 


CoffeeHubbert27.3%
 
Siegelman27.8%
 
James30.3%
 
Other14.7%
 


ColbertHubbert26.3%
 
Siegelman7.3%
 
James7.8%
 
Other58.5%
 


ConecuhHubbert35.0%
 
Siegelman25.6%
 
James24.4%
 
Other15.0%
 


CoosaHubbert38.2%
 
Siegelman22.2%
 
James25.9%
 
Other13.7%
 


CovingtonHubbert27.6%
 
Siegelman24.7%
 
James31.1%
 
Other16.6%
 


CrenshawHubbert31.9%
 
Siegelman21.9%
 
James33.8%
 
Other12.4%
 


CullmanHubbert40.8%
 
Siegelman17.2%
 
James13.4%
 
Other28.7%
 


DaleHubbert23.5%
 
Siegelman28.9%
 
James33.0%
 
Other14.6%
 


DallasHubbert22.6%
 
Siegelman33.3%
 
James32.6%
 
Other11.5%
 


DeKalbHubbert36.8%
 
Siegelman18.5%
 
James13.1%
 
Other31.6%
 


ElmoreHubbert30.5%
 
Siegelman17.1%
 
James36.6%
 
Other15.8%
 


EscambiaHubbert36.6%
 
Siegelman23.3%
 
James27.4%
 
Other12.7%
 


EtowahHubbert34.6%
 
Siegelman27.8%
 
James13.4%
 
Other24.2%
 


FayetteHubbert63.0%
 
Siegelman10.9%
 
James13.7%
 
Other12.4%
 


FranklinHubbert30.4%
 
Siegelman9.7%
 
James6.9%
 
Other53.0%
 


GenevaHubbert24.1%
 
Siegelman29.3%
 
James28.0%
 
Other18.7%
 


GreeneHubbert33.2%
 
Siegelman36.2%
 
James18.7%
 
Other11.9%
 


HaleHubbert43.9%
 
Siegelman21.3%
 
James21.7%
 
Other13.1%
 


HenryHubbert27.2%
 
Siegelman25.9%
 
James28.6%
 
Other18.3%
 


HoustonHubbert24.7%
 
Siegelman26.2%
 
James34.0%
 
Other15.1%
 


JacksonHubbert22.7%
 
Siegelman10.5%
 
James10.6%
 
Other56.2%
 


JeffersonHubbert35.8%
 
Siegelman32.3%
 
James21.3%
 
Other10.5%
 


LamarHubbert42.0%
 
Siegelman16.5%
 
James24.6%
 
Other16.9%
 


LauderdaleHubbert17.6%
 
Siegelman6.6%
 
James6.2%
 
Other69.6%
 


LawrenceHubbert27.4%
 
Siegelman9.5%
 
James8.6%
 
Other54.6%
 


LeeHubbert25.2%
 
Siegelman24.4%
 
James37.1%
 
Other13.3%
 


LimestoneHubbert30.0%
 
Siegelman11.0%
 
James12.6%
 
Other46.4%
 


LowndesHubbert39.3%
 
Siegelman21.6%
 
James28.4%
 
Other10.7%
 


MaconHubbert45.7%
 
Siegelman23.1%
 
James19.1%
 
Other12.1%
 


MadisonHubbert19.1%
 
Siegelman19.1%
 
James12.6%
 
Other49.2%
 


MarengoHubbert40.3%
 
Siegelman17.7%
 
James28.2%
 
Other13.8%
 


MarionHubbert40.3%
 
Siegelman17.5%
 
James12.1%
 
Other30.1%
 


MarshallHubbert32.3%
 
Siegelman18.3%
 
James15.4%
 
Other34.0%
 


MobileHubbert20.0%
 
Siegelman51.9%
 
James19.8%
 
Other8.3%
 


MonroeHubbert44.5%
 
Siegelman18.6%
 
James22.3%
 
Other14.6%
 


MontgomeryHubbert34.5%
 
Siegelman23.0%
 
James31.9%
 
Other10.6%
 


MorganHubbert28.0%
 
Siegelman13.0%
 
James15.0%
 
Other43.9%
 


PerryHubbert25.8%
 
Siegelman43.9%
 
James20.4%
 
Other9.9%
 


PickensHubbert33.6%
 
Siegelman16.3%
 
James28.0%
 
Other22.0%
 


PikeHubbert32.0%
 
Siegelman19.8%
 
James34.6%
 
Other13.6%
 


RandolphHubbert42.7%
 
Siegelman15.0%
 
James23.0%
 
Other19.2%
 


RussellHubbert33.1%
 
Siegelman23.0%
 
James34.7%
 
Other9.2%
 


St. ClairHubbert30.7%
 
Siegelman25.3%
 
James23.8%
 
Other20.2%
 


ShelbyHubbert31.0%
 
Siegelman30.1%
 
James25.6%
 
Other13.3%
 


SumterHubbert50.2%
 
Siegelman13.4%
 
James26.2%
 
Other10.2%
 


TalladegaHubbert37.0%
 
Siegelman21.1%
 
James26.1%
 
Other15.8%
 


TallapoosaHubbert28.7%
 
Siegelman21.3%
 
James33.8%
 
Other16.2%
 


TuscaloosaHubbert38.9%
 
Siegelman27.7%
 
James16.9%
 
Other16.4%
 


WalkerHubbert31.5%
 
Siegelman20.2%
 
James11.0%
 
Other37.4%
 


WashingtonHubbert35.3%
 
Siegelman37.7%
 
James16.7%
 
Other10.3%
 


WilcoxHubbert24.3%
 
Siegelman38.4%
 
James28.5%
 
Other8.8%
 


WinstonHubbert42.1%
 
Siegelman18.5%
 
James11.2%
 
Other28.2%
 



National DataGraph for 1990 - Alabama Results for 1990

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved