Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-04-11

Map

Map

Autauga	Folsom	35.7%
	Hubbert	56.1%
	Other	8.2%

Baldwin	Folsom	59.8%
	Hubbert	39.1%
	Other	1.1%

Barbour	Folsom	50.4%
	Hubbert	43.1%
	Other	6.4%

Bibb	Folsom	49.9%
	Hubbert	41.6%
	Other	8.6%

Blount	Folsom	54.1%
	Hubbert	40.3%
	Other	5.6%

Bullock	Folsom	66.3%
	Hubbert	29.4%
	Other	4.3%

Butler	Folsom	39.5%
	Hubbert	52.1%
	Other	8.4%

Calhoun	Folsom	51.2%
	Hubbert	41.6%
	Other	7.2%

Chambers	Folsom	45.8%
	Hubbert	47.7%
	Other	6.6%

Cherokee	Folsom	63.7%
	Hubbert	31.0%
	Other	5.3%

Chilton	Folsom	53.0%
	Hubbert	41.2%
	Other	5.9%

Choctaw	Folsom	52.6%
	Hubbert	42.1%
	Other	5.3%

Clarke	Folsom	50.6%
	Hubbert	45.3%
	Other	4.1%

Clay	Folsom	48.1%
	Hubbert	43.4%
	Other	8.5%

Cleburne	Folsom	46.9%
	Hubbert	45.3%
	Other	7.8%

Coffee	Folsom	44.6%
	Hubbert	47.3%
	Other	8.2%

Colbert	Folsom	59.1%
	Hubbert	36.3%
	Other	4.6%

Conecuh	Folsom	47.1%
	Hubbert	46.7%
	Other	6.1%

Coosa	Folsom	49.6%
	Hubbert	44.4%
	Other	6.0%

Covington	Folsom	39.4%
	Hubbert	51.1%
	Other	9.6%

Crenshaw	Folsom	45.8%
	Hubbert	47.3%
	Other	6.9%

Cullman	Folsom	53.4%
	Hubbert	40.0%
	Other	6.6%

Dale	Folsom	43.3%
	Hubbert	47.6%
	Other	9.1%

Dallas	Folsom	62.8%
	Hubbert	33.7%
	Other	3.5%

DeKalb	Folsom	51.4%
	Hubbert	43.1%
	Other	5.5%

Elmore	Folsom	36.1%
	Hubbert	58.2%
	Other	5.7%

Escambia	Folsom	51.1%
	Hubbert	42.9%
	Other	6.0%

Etowah	Folsom	58.6%
	Hubbert	36.0%
	Other	5.4%

Fayette	Folsom	49.0%
	Hubbert	44.9%
	Other	6.2%

Franklin	Folsom	51.6%
	Hubbert	42.2%
	Other	6.2%

Geneva	Folsom	45.2%
	Hubbert	45.4%
	Other	9.4%

Greene	Folsom	60.5%
	Hubbert	37.2%
	Other	2.3%

Hale	Folsom	53.4%
	Hubbert	43.0%
	Other	3.7%

Henry	Folsom	42.4%
	Hubbert	51.9%
	Other	5.7%

Houston	Folsom	44.9%
	Hubbert	48.3%
	Other	6.8%

Jackson	Folsom	60.5%
	Hubbert	34.7%
	Other	4.9%

Jefferson	Folsom	67.6%
	Hubbert	30.2%
	Other	2.2%

Lamar	Folsom	51.2%
	Hubbert	42.9%
	Other	5.9%

Lauderdale	Folsom	53.1%
	Hubbert	41.9%
	Other	5.1%

Lawrence	Folsom	45.3%
	Hubbert	48.5%
	Other	6.2%

Lee	Folsom	40.4%
	Hubbert	53.3%
	Other	6.3%

Limestone	Folsom	47.7%
	Hubbert	45.3%
	Other	7.0%

Lowndes	Folsom	61.9%
	Hubbert	33.7%
	Other	4.4%

Macon	Folsom	71.5%
	Hubbert	26.2%
	Other	2.3%

Madison	Folsom	57.7%
	Hubbert	36.9%
	Other	5.4%

Marengo	Folsom	47.9%
	Hubbert	46.1%
	Other	5.9%

Marion	Folsom	52.8%
	Hubbert	41.5%
	Other	5.6%

Marshall	Folsom	50.8%
	Hubbert	41.6%
	Other	7.6%

Mobile	Folsom	67.6%
	Hubbert	29.6%
	Other	2.8%

Monroe	Folsom	45.7%
	Hubbert	47.8%
	Other	6.5%

Montgomery	Folsom	48.0%
	Hubbert	49.3%
	Other	2.6%

Morgan	Folsom	39.6%
	Hubbert	49.2%
	Other	11.1%

Perry	Folsom	61.3%
	Hubbert	35.1%
	Other	3.6%

Pickens	Folsom	55.1%
	Hubbert	39.4%
	Other	5.5%

Pike	Folsom	47.4%
	Hubbert	47.0%
	Other	5.7%

Randolph	Folsom	53.0%
	Hubbert	41.1%
	Other	5.9%

Russell	Folsom	56.5%
	Hubbert	37.0%
	Other	6.5%

St. Clair	Folsom	54.7%
	Hubbert	42.6%
	Other	2.7%

Shelby	Folsom	48.8%
	Hubbert	43.8%
	Other	7.4%

Sumter	Folsom	45.0%
	Hubbert	51.8%
	Other	3.1%

Talladega	Folsom	52.0%
	Hubbert	40.3%
	Other	7.7%

Tallapoosa	Folsom	47.1%
	Hubbert	45.1%
	Other	7.8%

Tuscaloosa	Folsom	63.5%
	Hubbert	32.8%
	Other	3.7%

Walker	Folsom	47.6%
	Hubbert	44.3%
	Other	8.0%

Washington	Folsom	57.8%
	Hubbert	38.5%
	Other	3.7%

Wilcox	Folsom	72.3%
	Hubbert	24.6%
	Other	3.0%

Winston	Folsom	55.6%
	Hubbert	41.2%
	Other	3.2%

National DataGraph for 1994 - Alabama Results for 1994

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved