Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Accomack	Beyer	34.5%
	Gilmore	62.3%
	Other	3.2%

Albemarle	Beyer	44.2%
	Gilmore	54.4%
	Other	1.4%

Alleghany	Beyer	41.5%
	Gilmore	56.8%
	Other	1.7%

Amelia	Beyer	35.3%
	Gilmore	62.3%
	Other	2.4%

Amherst	Beyer	42.0%
	Gilmore	56.4%
	Other	1.6%

Appomattox	Beyer	43.1%
	Gilmore	55.0%
	Other	1.9%

Arlington	Beyer	62.0%
	Gilmore	36.8%
	Other	1.2%

Augusta	Beyer	26.9%
	Gilmore	71.8%
	Other	1.3%

Bath	Beyer	42.8%
	Gilmore	54.6%
	Other	2.6%

Bedford	Beyer	31.9%
	Gilmore	66.2%
	Other	1.8%

Bland	Beyer	31.7%
	Gilmore	66.3%
	Other	2.0%

Botetourt	Beyer	32.5%
	Gilmore	66.0%
	Other	1.5%

Brunswick	Beyer	51.9%
	Gilmore	45.5%
	Other	2.6%

Buchanan	Beyer	50.4%
	Gilmore	47.5%
	Other	2.1%

Buckingham	Beyer	45.1%
	Gilmore	52.4%
	Other	2.6%

Campbell	Beyer	33.4%
	Gilmore	65.0%
	Other	1.5%

Caroline	Beyer	50.1%
	Gilmore	47.7%
	Other	2.1%

Carroll	Beyer	31.2%
	Gilmore	66.4%
	Other	2.4%

Charles City	Beyer	62.6%
	Gilmore	35.5%
	Other	1.9%

Charlotte	Beyer	36.1%
	Gilmore	61.4%
	Other	2.5%

Chesterfield	Beyer	31.1%
	Gilmore	67.2%
	Other	1.7%

Clarke	Beyer	42.1%
	Gilmore	56.3%
	Other	1.6%

Craig	Beyer	37.3%
	Gilmore	59.8%
	Other	2.8%

Culpeper	Beyer	34.3%
	Gilmore	64.5%
	Other	1.2%

Cumberland	Beyer	35.9%
	Gilmore	62.1%
	Other	2.0%

Dickenson	Beyer	49.6%
	Gilmore	48.5%
	Other	2.0%

Dinwiddie	Beyer	38.3%
	Gilmore	58.6%
	Other	3.1%

Essex	Beyer	40.9%
	Gilmore	56.8%
	Other	2.3%

Fairfax	Beyer	46.7%
	Gilmore	52.5%
	Other	0.8%

Fauquier	Beyer	33.6%
	Gilmore	65.2%
	Other	1.2%

Floyd	Beyer	36.0%
	Gilmore	61.0%
	Other	3.0%

Fluvanna	Beyer	34.3%
	Gilmore	64.0%
	Other	1.6%

Franklin	Beyer	39.0%
	Gilmore	58.5%
	Other	2.5%

Frederick	Beyer	30.2%
	Gilmore	68.8%
	Other	1.0%

Giles	Beyer	42.3%
	Gilmore	55.9%
	Other	1.8%

Gloucester	Beyer	34.8%
	Gilmore	62.3%
	Other	2.9%

Goochland	Beyer	37.1%
	Gilmore	60.8%
	Other	2.1%

Grayson	Beyer	36.7%
	Gilmore	60.6%
	Other	2.7%

Greene	Beyer	28.7%
	Gilmore	68.9%
	Other	2.4%

Greensville	Beyer	54.4%
	Gilmore	44.0%
	Other	1.6%

Halifax	Beyer	35.8%
	Gilmore	62.0%
	Other	2.2%

Hanover	Beyer	28.2%
	Gilmore	70.5%
	Other	1.3%

Henrico	Beyer	39.1%
	Gilmore	59.2%
	Other	1.7%

Henry	Beyer	42.3%
	Gilmore	54.4%
	Other	3.2%

Highland	Beyer	33.4%
	Gilmore	64.9%
	Other	1.6%

Isle of Wight	Beyer	41.8%
	Gilmore	56.9%
	Other	1.3%

James City	Beyer	40.4%
	Gilmore	58.3%
	Other	1.3%

King George	Beyer	41.4%
	Gilmore	56.9%
	Other	1.7%

King and Queen	Beyer	47.7%
	Gilmore	49.8%
	Other	2.5%

King William	Beyer	38.0%
	Gilmore	60.4%
	Other	1.6%

Lancaster	Beyer	36.0%
	Gilmore	62.0%
	Other	2.0%

Lee	Beyer	36.1%
	Gilmore	60.1%
	Other	3.8%

Loudoun	Beyer	39.0%
	Gilmore	59.7%
	Other	1.3%

Louisa	Beyer	41.0%
	Gilmore	56.0%
	Other	2.9%

Lunenburg	Beyer	39.6%
	Gilmore	58.8%
	Other	1.5%

Madison	Beyer	34.7%
	Gilmore	63.1%
	Other	2.2%

Mathews	Beyer	35.0%
	Gilmore	61.9%
	Other	3.1%

Mecklenburg	Beyer	35.1%
	Gilmore	61.7%
	Other	3.2%

Middlesex	Beyer	36.8%
	Gilmore	59.9%
	Other	3.2%

Montgomery	Beyer	44.7%
	Gilmore	53.5%
	Other	1.8%

Nelson	Beyer	49.9%
	Gilmore	47.5%
	Other	2.6%

New Kent	Beyer	35.1%
	Gilmore	62.7%
	Other	2.2%

Northampton	Beyer	48.7%
	Gilmore	48.9%
	Other	2.5%

Northumberland	Beyer	35.0%
	Gilmore	63.1%
	Other	1.8%

Nottoway	Beyer	43.7%
	Gilmore	54.8%
	Other	1.5%

Orange	Beyer	36.6%
	Gilmore	61.8%
	Other	1.7%

Page	Beyer	36.6%
	Gilmore	62.3%
	Other	1.1%

Patrick	Beyer	37.1%
	Gilmore	60.2%
	Other	2.7%

Pittsylvania	Beyer	30.6%
	Gilmore	67.8%
	Other	1.6%

Powhatan	Beyer	26.7%
	Gilmore	71.4%
	Other	1.9%

Prince Edward	Beyer	46.0%
	Gilmore	52.1%
	Other	1.8%

Prince George	Beyer	33.6%
	Gilmore	65.1%
	Other	1.3%

Prince William	Beyer	35.6%
	Gilmore	63.1%
	Other	1.3%

Pulaski	Beyer	39.8%
	Gilmore	58.4%
	Other	1.8%

Rappahannock	Beyer	42.4%
	Gilmore	56.2%
	Other	1.4%

Richmond	Beyer	34.0%
	Gilmore	63.3%
	Other	2.6%

Roanoke	Beyer	36.0%
	Gilmore	62.5%
	Other	1.5%

Rockbridge	Beyer	36.2%
	Gilmore	62.4%
	Other	1.5%

Rockingham	Beyer	25.6%
	Gilmore	73.1%
	Other	1.3%

Russell	Beyer	49.2%
	Gilmore	49.1%
	Other	1.7%

Scott	Beyer	33.3%
	Gilmore	64.7%
	Other	2.0%

Shenandoah	Beyer	27.4%
	Gilmore	71.2%
	Other	1.4%

Smyth	Beyer	38.8%
	Gilmore	59.3%
	Other	1.9%

Southampton	Beyer	45.8%
	Gilmore	51.0%
	Other	3.3%

Spotsylvania	Beyer	38.4%
	Gilmore	60.1%
	Other	1.5%

Stafford	Beyer	38.1%
	Gilmore	60.2%
	Other	1.7%

Surry	Beyer	55.3%
	Gilmore	42.5%
	Other	2.2%

Sussex	Beyer	51.1%
	Gilmore	46.3%
	Other	2.6%

Tazewell	Beyer	42.6%
	Gilmore	55.4%
	Other	2.0%

Warren	Beyer	38.4%
	Gilmore	60.5%
	Other	1.1%

Washington	Beyer	38.1%
	Gilmore	60.3%
	Other	1.6%

Westmoreland	Beyer	44.8%
	Gilmore	53.4%
	Other	1.8%

Wise	Beyer	46.3%
	Gilmore	52.2%
	Other	1.5%

Wythe	Beyer	35.5%
	Gilmore	62.1%
	Other	2.4%

York	Beyer	35.7%
	Gilmore	62.9%
	Other	1.4%

City

Alexandria	Beyer	61.4%
	Gilmore	37.6%
	Other	1.0%

Bedford	Beyer	47.2%
	Gilmore	50.2%
	Other	2.6%

Bristol	Beyer	40.6%
	Gilmore	58.8%
	Other	0.6%

Buena Vista	Beyer	42.0%
	Gilmore	57.0%
	Other	1.0%

Charlottesville	Beyer	60.2%
	Gilmore	37.7%
	Other	2.1%

Chesapeake	Beyer	41.2%
	Gilmore	57.0%
	Other	1.8%

Clifton Forge	Beyer	54.9%
	Gilmore	43.5%
	Other	1.6%

Colonial Heights	Beyer	23.5%
	Gilmore	75.1%
	Other	1.5%

Covington	Beyer	51.3%
	Gilmore	47.0%
	Other	1.7%

Danville	Beyer	39.8%
	Gilmore	59.1%
	Other	1.1%

Emporia	Beyer	38.5%
	Gilmore	57.5%
	Other	4.0%

Fairfax	Beyer	46.4%
	Gilmore	52.5%
	Other	1.1%

Falls Church	Beyer	65.1%
	Gilmore	34.2%
	Other	0.7%

Franklin	Beyer	50.3%
	Gilmore	47.3%
	Other	2.5%

Fredericksburg	Beyer	54.0%
	Gilmore	44.1%
	Other	1.9%

Galax	Beyer	40.2%
	Gilmore	58.4%
	Other	1.4%

Hampton	Beyer	51.5%
	Gilmore	47.1%
	Other	1.4%

Harrisonburg	Beyer	38.6%
	Gilmore	60.3%
	Other	1.1%

Hopewell	Beyer	35.0%
	Gilmore	63.0%
	Other	2.0%

Lexington	Beyer	52.8%
	Gilmore	46.0%
	Other	1.2%

Lynchburg	Beyer	43.6%
	Gilmore	55.5%
	Other	0.9%

Manassas	Beyer	37.4%
	Gilmore	61.3%
	Other	1.3%

Manassas Park	Beyer	28.1%
	Gilmore	70.1%
	Other	1.8%

Martinsville	Beyer	50.4%
	Gilmore	46.7%
	Other	2.9%

Newport News	Beyer	45.4%
	Gilmore	52.7%
	Other	1.9%

Norfolk	Beyer	57.9%
	Gilmore	40.1%
	Other	2.0%

Norton	Beyer	53.2%
	Gilmore	44.3%
	Other	2.5%

Petersburg	Beyer	67.4%
	Gilmore	30.3%
	Other	2.4%

Poquoson	Beyer	28.6%
	Gilmore	70.5%
	Other	0.9%

Portsmouth	Beyer	57.0%
	Gilmore	41.5%
	Other	1.5%

Radford	Beyer	49.2%
	Gilmore	49.0%
	Other	1.8%

Richmond	Beyer	62.3%
	Gilmore	35.7%
	Other	2.0%

Roanoke	Beyer	49.2%
	Gilmore	48.3%
	Other	2.5%

Salem	Beyer	39.0%
	Gilmore	59.1%
	Other	1.8%

Staunton	Beyer	38.3%
	Gilmore	60.3%
	Other	1.4%

Suffolk	Beyer	44.6%
	Gilmore	53.8%
	Other	1.7%

Virginia Beach	Beyer	38.7%
	Gilmore	59.1%
	Other	2.3%

Waynesboro	Beyer	35.1%
	Gilmore	63.6%
	Other	1.4%

Williamsburg	Beyer	53.8%
	Gilmore	44.7%
	Other	1.4%

Winchester	Beyer	40.2%
	Gilmore	58.7%
	Other	1.1%

National DataGraph for 1997 - Virginia Results for 1997

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved