Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2011-03-18

Map

Map

Adams	Casey	43.8%
	True	53.0%
	Other	3.2%

Allegheny	Casey	62.7%
	True	33.9%
	Other	3.4%

Armstrong	Casey	52.4%
	True	43.4%
	Other	4.1%

Beaver	Casey	65.2%
	True	31.6%
	Other	3.1%

Bedford	Casey	39.1%
	True	58.2%
	Other	2.7%

Berks	Casey	53.9%
	True	42.0%
	Other	4.1%

Blair	Casey	41.8%
	True	54.9%
	Other	3.4%

Bradford	Casey	39.9%
	True	56.1%
	Other	4.1%

Bucks	Casey	52.9%
	True	43.7%
	Other	3.5%

Butler	Casey	46.9%
	True	49.5%
	Other	3.6%

Cambria	Casey	61.8%
	True	34.7%
	Other	3.5%

Cameron	Casey	48.9%
	True	47.3%
	Other	3.8%

Carbon	Casey	57.3%
	True	38.5%
	Other	4.2%

Centre	Casey	46.0%
	True	46.7%
	Other	7.3%

Chester	Casey	47.0%
	True	48.5%
	Other	4.5%

Clarion	Casey	47.0%
	True	48.9%
	Other	4.1%

Clearfield	Casey	50.6%
	True	45.5%
	Other	3.8%

Clinton	Casey	53.8%
	True	41.9%
	Other	4.3%

Columbia	Casey	52.5%
	True	42.5%
	Other	5.0%

Crawford	Casey	48.4%
	True	48.2%
	Other	3.4%

Cumberland	Casey	45.0%
	True	52.2%
	Other	2.8%

Dauphin	Casey	51.5%
	True	45.9%
	Other	2.5%

Delaware	Casey	55.7%
	True	41.7%
	Other	2.6%

Elk	Casey	58.0%
	True	37.9%
	Other	4.1%

Erie	Casey	64.5%
	True	32.3%
	Other	3.2%

Fayette	Casey	67.6%
	True	29.3%
	Other	3.1%

Forest	Casey	48.0%
	True	48.2%
	Other	3.8%

Franklin	Casey	40.5%
	True	56.4%
	Other	3.1%

Fulton	Casey	39.2%
	True	58.2%
	Other	2.5%

Greene	Casey	68.1%
	True	26.9%
	Other	5.0%

Huntingdon	Casey	37.6%
	True	58.7%
	Other	3.7%

Indiana	Casey	53.2%
	True	43.4%
	Other	3.5%

Jefferson	Casey	45.7%
	True	50.5%
	Other	3.8%

Juniata	Casey	45.0%
	True	52.8%
	Other	2.2%

Lackawanna	Casey	73.4%
	True	23.9%
	Other	2.7%

Lancaster	Casey	29.8%
	True	68.0%
	Other	2.2%

Lawrence	Casey	62.8%
	True	33.7%
	Other	3.5%

Lebanon	Casey	40.8%
	True	56.9%
	Other	2.2%

Lehigh	Casey	56.6%
	True	40.1%
	Other	3.3%

Luzerne	Casey	63.4%
	True	32.9%
	Other	3.7%

Lycoming	Casey	42.2%
	True	54.7%
	Other	3.1%

McKean	Casey	42.2%
	True	54.0%
	Other	3.8%

Mercer	Casey	57.4%
	True	39.8%
	Other	2.8%

Mifflin	Casey	39.0%
	True	59.2%
	Other	1.9%

Monroe	Casey	51.6%
	True	44.5%
	Other	3.9%

Montgomery	Casey	55.1%
	True	41.9%
	Other	3.0%

Montour	Casey	50.0%
	True	46.1%
	Other	3.8%

Northampton	Casey	58.1%
	True	38.4%
	Other	3.5%

Northumberland	Casey	50.7%
	True	45.5%
	Other	3.7%

Perry	Casey	38.7%
	True	58.3%
	Other	3.0%

Philadelphia	Casey	83.1%
	True	14.7%
	Other	2.3%

Pike	Casey	45.7%
	True	50.6%
	Other	3.7%

Potter	Casey	38.6%
	True	57.1%
	Other	4.4%

Schuylkill	Casey	53.8%
	True	42.2%
	Other	4.0%

Snyder	Casey	35.2%
	True	60.8%
	Other	4.0%

Somerset	Casey	48.6%
	True	48.7%
	Other	2.7%

Sullivan	Casey	44.0%
	True	52.1%
	Other	3.9%

Susquehanna	Casey	44.8%
	True	51.5%
	Other	3.7%

Tioga	Casey	38.2%
	True	57.5%
	Other	4.3%

Union	Casey	38.6%
	True	55.9%
	Other	5.5%

Venango	Casey	49.1%
	True	47.2%
	Other	3.8%

Warren	Casey	49.1%
	True	46.0%
	Other	4.9%

Washington	Casey	63.9%
	True	32.5%
	Other	3.7%

Wayne	Casey	43.9%
	True	52.7%
	Other	3.4%

Westmoreland	Casey	56.8%
	True	40.7%
	Other	2.6%

Wyoming	Casey	44.6%
	True	51.6%
	Other	3.8%

York	Casey	44.1%
	True	53.3%
	Other	2.7%

National DataGraph for 2000 - Pennsylvania Results for 2000

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved