Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2009-02-08

Map

Map

Autauga	Smith	52.9%
	Black	27.1%
	Foster	20.1%

Baldwin	Smith	50.9%
	Black	23.6%
	Foster	25.5%

Barbour	Smith	45.4%
	Black	30.7%
	Foster	24.0%

Bibb	Smith	34.4%
	Black	24.2%
	Foster	41.5%

Blount	Smith	54.5%
	Black	21.8%
	Foster	23.6%

Bullock	Smith	37.5%
	Black	32.5%
	Foster	30.0%

Butler	Smith	51.6%
	Black	28.9%
	Foster	19.5%

Calhoun	Smith	52.4%
	Black	23.3%
	Foster	24.2%

Chambers	Smith	48.1%
	Black	29.3%
	Foster	22.6%

Cherokee	Smith	57.2%
	Black	22.3%
	Foster	20.5%

Chilton	Smith	41.6%
	Black	34.5%
	Foster	23.9%

Choctaw	Smith	39.6%
	Black	36.5%
	Foster	24.0%

Clarke	Smith	42.5%
	Black	31.0%
	Foster	26.5%

Clay	Smith	53.4%
	Black	27.8%
	Foster	18.8%

Cleburne	Smith	50.0%
	Black	18.7%
	Foster	31.4%

Coffee	Smith	55.7%
	Black	23.8%
	Foster	20.5%

Colbert	Smith	40.7%
	Black	41.5%
	Foster	17.8%

Conecuh	Smith	48.6%
	Black	25.4%
	Foster	25.9%

Coosa	Smith	47.1%
	Black	30.3%
	Foster	22.6%

Covington	Smith	46.3%
	Black	20.6%
	Foster	33.1%

Crenshaw	Smith	52.0%
	Black	20.8%
	Foster	27.2%

Cullman	Smith	51.9%
	Black	26.3%
	Foster	21.8%

Dale	Smith	58.4%
	Black	22.5%
	Foster	19.2%

Dallas	Smith	40.3%
	Black	31.3%
	Foster	28.3%

DeKalb	Smith	40.9%
	Black	38.1%
	Foster	21.0%

Elmore	Smith	56.8%
	Black	22.9%
	Foster	20.4%

Escambia	Smith	51.2%
	Black	24.0%
	Foster	24.8%

Etowah	Smith	50.3%
	Black	32.2%
	Foster	17.5%

Fayette	Smith	40.5%
	Black	25.3%
	Foster	34.2%

Franklin	Smith	42.7%
	Black	29.7%
	Foster	27.6%

Geneva	Smith	55.4%
	Black	24.0%
	Foster	20.6%

Greene	Smith	29.4%
	Black	22.2%
	Foster	48.4%

Hale	Smith	20.5%
	Black	48.8%
	Foster	30.7%

Henry	Smith	58.4%
	Black	20.8%
	Foster	20.8%

Houston	Smith	54.8%
	Black	25.5%
	Foster	19.7%

Jackson	Smith	49.3%
	Black	27.0%
	Foster	23.7%

Jefferson	Smith	40.7%
	Black	45.8%
	Foster	13.4%

Lamar	Smith	43.3%
	Black	21.6%
	Foster	35.1%

Lauderdale	Smith	48.2%
	Black	33.6%
	Foster	18.2%

Lawrence	Smith	41.9%
	Black	34.2%
	Foster	23.9%

Lee	Smith	40.9%
	Black	30.5%
	Foster	28.5%

Limestone	Smith	43.3%
	Black	31.5%
	Foster	25.2%

Lowndes	Smith	34.6%
	Black	35.7%
	Foster	29.7%

Macon	Smith	34.4%
	Black	34.3%
	Foster	31.3%

Madison	Smith	45.9%
	Black	34.8%
	Foster	19.3%

Marengo	Smith	35.4%
	Black	40.5%
	Foster	24.2%

Marion	Smith	43.8%
	Black	28.2%
	Foster	28.0%

Marshall	Smith	59.6%
	Black	22.1%
	Foster	18.3%

Mobile	Smith	37.6%
	Black	31.5%
	Foster	30.9%

Monroe	Smith	38.0%
	Black	37.5%
	Foster	24.5%

Montgomery	Smith	44.9%
	Black	34.3%
	Foster	20.8%

Morgan	Smith	50.1%
	Black	28.8%
	Foster	21.1%

Perry	Smith	22.2%
	Black	54.4%
	Foster	23.4%

Pickens	Smith	33.9%
	Black	33.7%
	Foster	32.4%

Pike	Smith	43.6%
	Black	31.6%
	Foster	24.8%

Randolph	Smith	46.2%
	Black	32.1%
	Foster	21.7%

Russell	Smith	43.0%
	Black	37.7%
	Foster	19.4%

St. Clair	Smith	51.6%
	Black	28.3%
	Foster	20.1%

Shelby	Smith	50.6%
	Black	30.7%
	Foster	18.7%

Sumter	Smith	28.3%
	Black	39.7%
	Foster	32.0%

Talladega	Smith	43.2%
	Black	36.8%
	Foster	20.0%

Tallapoosa	Smith	51.6%
	Black	30.4%
	Foster	17.9%

Tuscaloosa	Smith	26.7%
	Black	19.3%
	Foster	54.0%

Walker	Smith	46.1%
	Black	28.5%
	Foster	25.3%

Washington	Smith	35.8%
	Black	31.9%
	Foster	32.3%

Wilcox	Smith	31.5%
	Black	34.4%
	Foster	34.1%

Winston	Smith	48.5%
	Black	23.1%
	Foster	28.4%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Alabama Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved