2002 Gubernatorial General Election Data Graphs - Michigan
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AlconaGranholm47.2%
 
Posthumus52.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


AlgerGranholm52.6%
 
Posthumus46.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


AlleganGranholm36.7%
 
Posthumus62.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


AlpenaGranholm56.9%
 
Posthumus42.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


AntrimGranholm39.7%
 
Posthumus59.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


ArenacGranholm51.1%
 
Posthumus47.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


BaragaGranholm50.9%
 
Posthumus47.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


BarryGranholm40.1%
 
Posthumus58.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


BayGranholm53.3%
 
Posthumus45.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


BenzieGranholm45.8%
 
Posthumus52.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


BerrienGranholm41.9%
 
Posthumus57.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


BranchGranholm45.0%
 
Posthumus54.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


CalhounGranholm52.6%
 
Posthumus46.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


CassGranholm45.1%
 
Posthumus53.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


CharlevoixGranholm39.9%
 
Posthumus58.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


CheboyganGranholm43.3%
 
Posthumus55.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


ChippewaGranholm49.8%
 
Posthumus49.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


ClareGranholm50.1%
 
Posthumus48.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


ClintonGranholm46.3%
 
Posthumus52.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


CrawfordGranholm45.6%
 
Posthumus52.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


DeltaGranholm50.4%
 
Posthumus48.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


DickinsonGranholm46.5%
 
Posthumus52.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


EatonGranholm52.2%
 
Posthumus46.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


EmmetGranholm37.2%
 
Posthumus61.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


GeneseeGranholm60.1%
 
Posthumus38.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


GladwinGranholm48.2%
 
Posthumus50.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


GogebicGranholm57.9%
 
Posthumus40.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


Grand TraverseGranholm40.9%
 
Posthumus57.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


GratiotGranholm44.9%
 
Posthumus54.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


HillsdaleGranholm38.4%
 
Posthumus60.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


HoughtonGranholm48.6%
 
Posthumus49.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


HuronGranholm39.4%
 
Posthumus59.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


InghamGranholm60.9%
 
Posthumus37.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


IoniaGranholm43.2%
 
Posthumus55.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


IoscoGranholm50.3%
 
Posthumus48.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


IronGranholm53.5%
 
Posthumus44.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


IsabellaGranholm49.5%
 
Posthumus48.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


JacksonGranholm46.9%
 
Posthumus51.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


KalamazooGranholm52.3%
 
Posthumus46.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


KalkaskaGranholm42.0%
 
Posthumus56.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


KentGranholm38.5%
 
Posthumus60.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


KeweenawGranholm46.0%
 
Posthumus52.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


LakeGranholm52.2%
 
Posthumus45.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


LapeerGranholm39.4%
 
Posthumus59.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


LeelanauGranholm42.9%
 
Posthumus55.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


LenaweeGranholm47.1%
 
Posthumus51.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


LivingstonGranholm37.1%
 
Posthumus61.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


LuceGranholm52.3%
 
Posthumus45.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


MackinacGranholm47.3%
 
Posthumus52.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


MacombGranholm47.2%
 
Posthumus51.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


ManisteeGranholm49.3%
 
Posthumus49.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


MarquetteGranholm57.7%
 
Posthumus40.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


MasonGranholm45.6%
 
Posthumus53.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


MecostaGranholm44.3%
 
Posthumus54.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


MenomineeGranholm47.4%
 
Posthumus50.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


MidlandGranholm41.3%
 
Posthumus57.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


MissaukeeGranholm32.9%
 
Posthumus66.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


MonroeGranholm47.8%
 
Posthumus51.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


MontcalmGranholm44.2%
 
Posthumus55.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


MontmorencyGranholm42.9%
 
Posthumus55.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


MuskegonGranholm56.5%
 
Posthumus42.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


NewaygoGranholm40.8%
 
Posthumus58.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


OaklandGranholm50.5%
 
Posthumus48.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


OceanaGranholm45.2%
 
Posthumus53.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


OgemawGranholm49.5%
 
Posthumus49.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


OntonagonGranholm48.4%
 
Posthumus49.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


OsceolaGranholm40.0%
 
Posthumus59.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


OscodaGranholm41.8%
 
Posthumus56.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


OtsegoGranholm39.5%
 
Posthumus58.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


OttawaGranholm28.1%
 
Posthumus71.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


Presque IsleGranholm48.1%
 
Posthumus50.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


RoscommonGranholm47.8%
 
Posthumus50.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


SaginawGranholm52.6%
 
Posthumus46.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


St. ClairGranholm45.4%
 
Posthumus52.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


St. JosephGranholm40.9%
 
Posthumus58.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


SanilacGranholm37.4%
 
Posthumus60.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


SchoolcraftGranholm52.9%
 
Posthumus45.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


ShiawasseeGranholm47.0%
 
Posthumus51.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


TuscolaGranholm42.1%
 
Posthumus56.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


Van BurenGranholm49.1%
 
Posthumus49.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


WashtenawGranholm61.4%
 
Posthumus36.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


WayneGranholm67.8%
 
Posthumus31.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


WexfordGranholm42.3%
 
Posthumus56.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 



National DataGraph for 2002 - Michigan Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved