2002 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - Minnesota
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AitkinMondale48.1%
 
Coleman46.3%
 
Moore3.4%
 
Other2.2%
 


AnokaMondale41.2%
 
Coleman56.0%
 
Moore2.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


BeckerMondale44.0%
 
Coleman51.5%
 
Moore3.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


BeltramiMondale48.8%
 
Coleman47.6%
 
Moore1.6%
 
Other2.0%
 


BentonMondale42.8%
 
Coleman53.0%
 
Moore2.9%
 
Other1.4%
 


Big StoneMondale49.5%
 
Coleman43.4%
 
Moore3.2%
 
Other4.0%
 


Blue EarthMondale47.3%
 
Coleman48.0%
 
Moore3.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


BrownMondale38.4%
 
Coleman57.3%
 
Moore3.3%
 
Other1.0%
 


CarltonMondale60.0%
 
Coleman35.8%
 
Moore2.3%
 
Other2.0%
 


CarverMondale31.8%
 
Coleman65.9%
 
Moore1.7%
 
Other0.6%
 


CassMondale40.1%
 
Coleman53.6%
 
Moore2.8%
 
Other3.5%
 


ChippewaMondale54.0%
 
Coleman42.4%
 
Moore2.8%
 
Other0.7%
 


ChisagoMondale39.5%
 
Coleman57.3%
 
Moore2.5%
 
Other0.6%
 


ClayMondale51.1%
 
Coleman45.8%
 
Moore2.4%
 
Other0.6%
 


ClearwaterMondale47.5%
 
Coleman48.7%
 
Moore2.3%
 
Other1.5%
 


CookMondale44.5%
 
Coleman42.3%
 
Moore4.1%
 
Other9.0%
 


CottonwoodMondale46.8%
 
Coleman49.9%
 
Moore2.4%
 
Other0.9%
 


Crow WingMondale41.1%
 
Coleman53.7%
 
Moore2.3%
 
Other2.9%
 


DakotaMondale40.7%
 
Coleman57.0%
 
Moore1.4%
 
Other0.9%
 


DodgeMondale43.8%
 
Coleman51.6%
 
Moore3.7%
 
Other0.9%
 


DouglasMondale39.2%
 
Coleman56.2%
 
Moore2.8%
 
Other1.8%
 


FaribaultMondale47.4%
 
Coleman48.8%
 
Moore2.9%
 
Other0.9%
 


FillmoreMondale52.2%
 
Coleman43.5%
 
Moore3.2%
 
Other1.1%
 


FreebornMondale53.3%
 
Coleman41.4%
 
Moore3.3%
 
Other2.1%
 


GoodhueMondale44.3%
 
Coleman52.1%
 
Moore2.5%
 
Other1.2%
 


GrantMondale47.6%
 
Coleman46.3%
 
Moore3.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


HennepinMondale52.0%
 
Coleman45.3%
 
Moore1.5%
 
Other1.2%
 


HoustonMondale47.4%
 
Coleman48.8%
 
Moore2.8%
 
Other1.0%
 


HubbardMondale41.4%
 
Coleman54.4%
 
Moore2.4%
 
Other1.8%
 


IsantiMondale40.6%
 
Coleman56.4%
 
Moore2.2%
 
Other0.8%
 


ItascaMondale55.4%
 
Coleman39.8%
 
Moore2.4%
 
Other2.4%
 


JacksonMondale49.6%
 
Coleman46.2%
 
Moore3.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


KanabecMondale42.3%
 
Coleman53.9%
 
Moore2.6%
 
Other1.2%
 


KandiyohiMondale45.4%
 
Coleman51.5%
 
Moore2.2%
 
Other0.9%
 


KittsonMondale50.9%
 
Coleman39.4%
 
Moore2.4%
 
Other7.3%
 


KoochichingMondale51.1%
 
Coleman45.0%
 
Moore2.5%
 
Other1.3%
 


Lac Qui ParleMondale55.0%
 
Coleman40.6%
 
Moore3.6%
 
Other0.8%
 


LakeMondale58.7%
 
Coleman36.9%
 
Moore2.8%
 
Other1.6%
 


Lake of the WoodsMondale34.7%
 
Coleman51.8%
 
Moore4.6%
 
Other8.9%
 


Le SueurMondale44.4%
 
Coleman51.5%
 
Moore2.9%
 
Other1.2%
 


LincolnMondale53.6%
 
Coleman41.9%
 
Moore3.1%
 
Other1.4%
 


LyonMondale45.8%
 
Coleman50.5%
 
Moore2.7%
 
Other1.0%
 


McLeodMondale36.0%
 
Coleman59.9%
 
Moore3.1%
 
Other0.9%
 


MahnomenMondale51.5%
 
Coleman43.9%
 
Moore2.6%
 
Other2.0%
 


MarshallMondale50.7%
 
Coleman45.2%
 
Moore3.1%
 
Other1.0%
 


MartinMondale43.0%
 
Coleman53.5%
 
Moore2.7%
 
Other0.9%
 


MeekerMondale40.9%
 
Coleman54.6%
 
Moore3.1%
 
Other1.5%
 


Mille LacsMondale42.7%
 
Coleman53.5%
 
Moore2.5%
 
Other1.2%
 


MorrisonMondale41.5%
 
Coleman53.9%
 
Moore3.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


MowerMondale58.5%
 
Coleman37.7%
 
Moore2.5%
 
Other1.3%
 


MurrayMondale49.8%
 
Coleman45.8%
 
Moore2.8%
 
Other1.6%
 


NicolletMondale47.6%
 
Coleman49.0%
 
Moore2.5%
 
Other1.0%
 


NoblesMondale46.9%
 
Coleman49.2%
 
Moore2.6%
 
Other1.4%
 


NormanMondale58.0%
 
Coleman38.4%
 
Moore2.4%
 
Other1.2%
 


OlmstedMondale43.8%
 
Coleman52.9%
 
Moore2.6%
 
Other0.7%
 


Otter TailMondale40.6%
 
Coleman56.0%
 
Moore2.2%
 
Other1.2%
 


PenningtonMondale51.7%
 
Coleman45.0%
 
Moore2.5%
 
Other0.8%
 


PineMondale49.6%
 
Coleman46.4%
 
Moore2.9%
 
Other1.1%
 


PipestoneMondale44.3%
 
Coleman51.1%
 
Moore3.3%
 
Other1.3%
 


PolkMondale50.3%
 
Coleman46.0%
 
Moore1.9%
 
Other1.8%
 


PopeMondale50.5%
 
Coleman45.7%
 
Moore2.5%
 
Other1.3%
 


RamseyMondale55.5%
 
Coleman42.1%
 
Moore1.4%
 
Other1.0%
 


Red LakeMondale51.3%
 
Coleman43.5%
 
Moore3.0%
 
Other2.2%
 


RedwoodMondale39.6%
 
Coleman55.9%
 
Moore3.4%
 
Other1.1%
 


RenvilleMondale47.7%
 
Coleman47.8%
 
Moore3.4%
 
Other1.1%
 


RiceMondale52.2%
 
Coleman44.6%
 
Moore2.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


RockMondale44.2%
 
Coleman52.0%
 
Moore2.8%
 
Other1.0%
 


RoseauMondale40.8%
 
Coleman55.7%
 
Moore2.3%
 
Other1.2%
 


St. LouisMondale65.4%
 
Coleman31.6%
 
Moore1.8%
 
Other1.2%
 


ScottMondale34.4%
 
Coleman63.1%
 
Moore1.8%
 
Other0.7%
 


SherburneMondale34.7%
 
Coleman62.1%
 
Moore2.2%
 
Other1.0%
 


SibleyMondale39.8%
 
Coleman55.1%
 
Moore4.4%
 
Other0.8%
 


StearnsMondale40.8%
 
Coleman55.4%
 
Moore2.5%
 
Other1.2%
 


SteeleMondale42.8%
 
Coleman53.4%
 
Moore2.9%
 
Other0.9%
 


StevensMondale47.9%
 
Coleman49.0%
 
Moore1.7%
 
Other1.5%
 


SwiftMondale57.2%
 
Coleman39.3%
 
Moore2.8%
 
Other0.7%
 


ToddMondale42.1%
 
Coleman53.2%
 
Moore3.4%
 
Other1.3%
 


TraverseMondale52.2%
 
Coleman43.8%
 
Moore3.1%
 
Other0.9%
 


WabashaMondale46.3%
 
Coleman49.9%
 
Moore3.1%
 
Other0.8%
 


WadenaMondale40.5%
 
Coleman55.6%
 
Moore2.8%
 
Other1.1%
 


WasecaMondale43.2%
 
Coleman51.1%
 
Moore4.6%
 
Other1.1%
 


WashingtonMondale40.7%
 
Coleman57.1%
 
Moore1.3%
 
Other0.9%
 


WatonwanMondale47.0%
 
Coleman47.3%
 
Moore3.9%
 
Other1.7%
 


WilkinMondale42.4%
 
Coleman54.0%
 
Moore2.8%
 
Other0.8%
 


WinonaMondale49.6%
 
Coleman46.8%
 
Moore2.4%
 
Other1.2%
 


WrightMondale35.0%
 
Coleman61.9%
 
Moore2.2%
 
Other0.9%
 


Yellow MedicineMondale52.6%
 
Coleman43.3%
 
Moore3.1%
 
Other1.0%
 



National DataGraph for 2002 - Minnesota Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved