Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alamance	Easley	50.8%
	Ballantine	47.7%
	Other	1.4%

Alexander	Easley	44.8%
	Ballantine	53.7%
	Other	1.5%

Alleghany	Easley	58.0%
	Ballantine	40.5%
	Other	1.5%

Anson	Easley	71.5%
	Ballantine	27.4%
	Other	1.1%

Ashe	Easley	51.8%
	Ballantine	46.6%
	Other	1.6%

Avery	Easley	33.3%
	Ballantine	64.6%
	Other	2.1%

Beaufort	Easley	57.2%
	Ballantine	41.3%
	Other	1.5%

Bertie	Easley	73.0%
	Ballantine	26.2%
	Other	0.9%

Bladen	Easley	66.8%
	Ballantine	32.2%
	Other	1.0%

Brunswick	Easley	56.2%
	Ballantine	42.5%
	Other	1.3%

Buncombe	Easley	57.7%
	Ballantine	39.8%
	Other	2.5%

Burke	Easley	47.1%
	Ballantine	51.3%
	Other	1.6%

Cabarrus	Easley	48.2%
	Ballantine	50.2%
	Other	1.6%

Caldwell	Easley	44.9%
	Ballantine	53.4%
	Other	1.7%

Camden	Easley	51.5%
	Ballantine	46.7%
	Other	1.8%

Carteret	Easley	46.5%
	Ballantine	51.8%
	Other	1.7%

Caswell	Easley	61.3%
	Ballantine	37.5%
	Other	1.2%

Catawba	Easley	44.9%
	Ballantine	53.6%
	Other	1.5%

Chatham	Easley	59.4%
	Ballantine	39.1%
	Other	1.6%

Cherokee	Easley	44.0%
	Ballantine	54.5%
	Other	1.6%

Chowan	Easley	57.8%
	Ballantine	40.4%
	Other	1.8%

Clay	Easley	42.2%
	Ballantine	55.6%
	Other	2.2%

Cleveland	Easley	54.2%
	Ballantine	44.6%
	Other	1.2%

Columbus	Easley	63.9%
	Ballantine	34.9%
	Other	1.2%

Craven	Easley	50.8%
	Ballantine	47.9%
	Other	1.3%

Cumberland	Easley	61.7%
	Ballantine	36.7%
	Other	1.5%

Currituck	Easley	47.2%
	Ballantine	49.5%
	Other	3.3%

Dare	Easley	56.1%
	Ballantine	41.3%
	Other	2.6%

Davidson	Easley	45.6%
	Ballantine	52.8%
	Other	1.7%

Davie	Easley	39.5%
	Ballantine	58.5%
	Other	2.0%

Duplin	Easley	57.3%
	Ballantine	41.7%
	Other	1.0%

Durham	Easley	73.0%
	Ballantine	25.4%
	Other	1.6%

Edgecombe	Easley	76.1%
	Ballantine	23.1%
	Other	0.8%

Forsyth	Easley	56.1%
	Ballantine	42.5%
	Other	1.5%

Franklin	Easley	60.0%
	Ballantine	38.5%
	Other	1.5%

Gaston	Easley	45.4%
	Ballantine	53.1%
	Other	1.5%

Gates	Easley	65.2%
	Ballantine	33.4%
	Other	1.3%

Graham	Easley	46.7%
	Ballantine	51.6%
	Other	1.8%

Granville	Easley	62.7%
	Ballantine	36.0%
	Other	1.3%

Greene	Easley	57.0%
	Ballantine	42.2%
	Other	0.8%

Guilford	Easley	60.5%
	Ballantine	37.9%
	Other	1.6%

Halifax	Easley	74.0%
	Ballantine	25.2%
	Other	0.8%

Harnett	Easley	50.9%
	Ballantine	47.7%
	Other	1.4%

Haywood	Easley	58.8%
	Ballantine	39.5%
	Other	1.7%

Henderson	Easley	45.2%
	Ballantine	53.5%
	Other	1.3%

Hertford	Easley	73.9%
	Ballantine	24.9%
	Other	1.2%

Hoke	Easley	66.5%
	Ballantine	31.9%
	Other	1.5%

Hyde	Easley	61.8%
	Ballantine	37.3%
	Other	0.9%

Iredell	Easley	46.6%
	Ballantine	51.8%
	Other	1.7%

Jackson	Easley	56.6%
	Ballantine	41.2%
	Other	2.2%

Johnston	Easley	48.2%
	Ballantine	50.7%
	Other	1.1%

Jones	Easley	58.6%
	Ballantine	40.5%
	Other	0.8%

Lee	Easley	56.9%
	Ballantine	41.9%
	Other	1.2%

Lenoir	Easley	56.1%
	Ballantine	43.3%
	Other	0.5%

Lincoln	Easley	46.0%
	Ballantine	52.5%
	Other	1.5%

McDowell	Easley	48.5%
	Ballantine	49.9%
	Other	1.5%

Macon	Easley	48.4%
	Ballantine	50.5%
	Other	1.1%

Madison	Easley	55.0%
	Ballantine	43.3%
	Other	1.7%

Martin	Easley	68.1%
	Ballantine	30.8%
	Other	1.0%

Mecklenburg	Easley	58.5%
	Ballantine	40.0%
	Other	1.5%

Mitchell	Easley	34.7%
	Ballantine	63.7%
	Other	1.6%

Montgomery	Easley	55.8%
	Ballantine	42.9%
	Other	1.3%

Moore	Easley	48.1%
	Ballantine	51.0%
	Other	0.8%

Nash	Easley	61.3%
	Ballantine	37.9%
	Other	0.8%

New Hanover	Easley	53.5%
	Ballantine	45.0%
	Other	1.6%

Northampton	Easley	75.3%
	Ballantine	23.8%
	Other	0.9%

Onslow	Easley	46.9%
	Ballantine	50.8%
	Other	2.3%

Orange	Easley	71.7%
	Ballantine	26.3%
	Other	2.0%

Pamlico	Easley	56.1%
	Ballantine	42.6%
	Other	1.2%

Pasquotank	Easley	61.4%
	Ballantine	36.9%
	Other	1.7%

Pender	Easley	53.0%
	Ballantine	45.7%
	Other	1.2%

Perquimans	Easley	53.1%
	Ballantine	45.4%
	Other	1.5%

Person	Easley	60.6%
	Ballantine	38.1%
	Other	1.3%

Pitt	Easley	57.9%
	Ballantine	41.1%
	Other	1.0%

Polk	Easley	51.7%
	Ballantine	46.5%
	Other	1.8%

Randolph	Easley	39.9%
	Ballantine	58.5%
	Other	1.6%

Richmond	Easley	66.1%
	Ballantine	32.0%
	Other	1.9%

Robeson	Easley	70.3%
	Ballantine	28.7%
	Other	1.0%

Rockingham	Easley	56.9%
	Ballantine	41.3%
	Other	1.8%

Rowan	Easley	47.4%
	Ballantine	50.7%
	Other	1.9%

Rutherford	Easley	50.0%
	Ballantine	48.6%
	Other	1.4%

Sampson	Easley	57.0%
	Ballantine	42.1%
	Other	0.9%

Scotland	Easley	62.0%
	Ballantine	36.6%
	Other	1.4%

Stanly	Easley	45.6%
	Ballantine	52.9%
	Other	1.5%

Stokes	Easley	47.2%
	Ballantine	51.2%
	Other	1.6%

Surry	Easley	50.0%
	Ballantine	48.6%
	Other	1.4%

Swain	Easley	58.3%
	Ballantine	40.2%
	Other	1.6%

Transylvania	Easley	49.1%
	Ballantine	48.9%
	Other	2.0%

Tyrrell	Easley	63.9%
	Ballantine	34.9%
	Other	1.1%

Union	Easley	40.9%
	Ballantine	57.8%
	Other	1.2%

Vance	Easley	70.2%
	Ballantine	29.0%
	Other	0.9%

Wake	Easley	58.8%
	Ballantine	39.7%
	Other	1.5%

Warren	Easley	74.5%
	Ballantine	24.8%
	Other	0.7%

Washington	Easley	67.0%
	Ballantine	31.1%
	Other	2.0%

Watauga	Easley	52.3%
	Ballantine	44.9%
	Other	2.7%

Wayne	Easley	51.0%
	Ballantine	48.0%
	Other	1.1%

Wilkes	Easley	44.6%
	Ballantine	54.0%
	Other	1.4%

Wilson	Easley	60.2%
	Ballantine	39.1%
	Other	0.7%

Yadkin	Easley	41.0%
	Ballantine	57.4%
	Other	1.6%

Yancey	Easley	55.7%
	Ballantine	42.9%
	Other	1.4%

National DataGraph for 2004 - North Carolina Results for 2004

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved