Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-02-07

Map

Map

Appling	Martin	33.8%
	Cagle	64.6%
	Other	1.6%

Atkinson	Martin	39.8%
	Cagle	58.0%
	Other	2.2%

Bacon	Martin	38.1%
	Cagle	59.8%
	Other	2.1%

Baker	Martin	55.6%
	Cagle	42.3%
	Other	2.1%

Baldwin	Martin	50.8%
	Cagle	46.4%
	Other	2.8%

Banks	Martin	24.2%
	Cagle	72.6%
	Other	3.3%

Barrow	Martin	24.7%
	Cagle	70.2%
	Other	5.1%

Bartow	Martin	28.4%
	Cagle	67.1%
	Other	4.5%

Ben Hill	Martin	47.9%
	Cagle	50.6%
	Other	1.5%

Berrien	Martin	37.5%
	Cagle	60.2%
	Other	2.4%

Bibb	Martin	51.7%
	Cagle	45.7%
	Other	2.6%

Bleckley	Martin	31.8%
	Cagle	65.7%
	Other	2.5%

Brantley	Martin	32.8%
	Cagle	64.6%
	Other	2.7%

Brooks	Martin	46.0%
	Cagle	51.6%
	Other	2.5%

Bryan	Martin	28.7%
	Cagle	68.5%
	Other	2.8%

Bulloch	Martin	35.0%
	Cagle	62.9%
	Other	2.1%

Burke	Martin	47.2%
	Cagle	51.1%
	Other	1.7%

Butts	Martin	34.4%
	Cagle	62.0%
	Other	3.5%

Calhoun	Martin	58.7%
	Cagle	39.8%
	Other	1.5%

Camden	Martin	35.4%
	Cagle	62.0%
	Other	2.6%

Candler	Martin	38.4%
	Cagle	58.7%
	Other	2.9%

Carroll	Martin	31.4%
	Cagle	64.7%
	Other	3.8%

Catoosa	Martin	27.1%
	Cagle	70.7%
	Other	2.2%

Charlton	Martin	39.9%
	Cagle	58.0%
	Other	2.1%

Chatham	Martin	46.7%
	Cagle	50.9%
	Other	2.3%

Chattahoochee	Martin	49.6%
	Cagle	46.8%
	Other	3.6%

Chattooga	Martin	47.8%
	Cagle	49.7%
	Other	2.5%

Cherokee	Martin	20.7%
	Cagle	73.7%
	Other	5.6%

Clarke	Martin	59.5%
	Cagle	35.9%
	Other	4.6%

Clay	Martin	60.5%
	Cagle	38.5%
	Other	1.0%

Clayton	Martin	71.9%
	Cagle	25.4%
	Other	2.7%

Clinch	Martin	47.1%
	Cagle	50.0%
	Other	2.9%

Cobb	Martin	37.2%
	Cagle	57.5%
	Other	5.3%

Coffee	Martin	34.8%
	Cagle	63.2%
	Other	2.0%

Colquitt	Martin	34.6%
	Cagle	62.9%
	Other	2.5%

Columbia	Martin	23.9%
	Cagle	73.5%
	Other	2.6%

Cook	Martin	40.3%
	Cagle	58.0%
	Other	1.8%

Coweta	Martin	26.2%
	Cagle	69.5%
	Other	4.3%

Crawford	Martin	39.5%
	Cagle	57.4%
	Other	3.1%

Crisp	Martin	36.8%
	Cagle	61.4%
	Other	1.8%

Dade	Martin	34.1%
	Cagle	63.1%
	Other	2.7%

Dawson	Martin	18.7%
	Cagle	76.2%
	Other	5.1%

Decatur	Martin	44.2%
	Cagle	54.1%
	Other	1.8%

DeKalb	Martin	72.4%
	Cagle	23.8%
	Other	3.7%

Dodge	Martin	40.4%
	Cagle	57.9%
	Other	1.8%

Dooly	Martin	50.9%
	Cagle	47.5%
	Other	1.6%

Dougherty	Martin	62.0%
	Cagle	36.2%
	Other	1.7%

Douglas	Martin	40.7%
	Cagle	55.1%
	Other	4.2%

Early	Martin	49.7%
	Cagle	48.3%
	Other	2.0%

Echols	Martin	40.4%
	Cagle	57.1%
	Other	2.5%

Effingham	Martin	24.6%
	Cagle	73.3%
	Other	2.1%

Elbert	Martin	44.6%
	Cagle	53.0%
	Other	2.4%

Emanuel	Martin	37.9%
	Cagle	60.3%
	Other	1.8%

Evans	Martin	39.1%
	Cagle	59.6%
	Other	1.4%

Fannin	Martin	29.8%
	Cagle	66.8%
	Other	3.4%

Fayette	Martin	31.3%
	Cagle	64.4%
	Other	4.4%

Floyd	Martin	36.0%
	Cagle	60.6%
	Other	3.4%

Forsyth	Martin	16.5%
	Cagle	78.1%
	Other	5.4%

Franklin	Martin	38.0%
	Cagle	58.8%
	Other	3.2%

Fulton	Martin	58.5%
	Cagle	37.6%
	Other	3.9%

Gilmer	Martin	26.5%
	Cagle	69.4%
	Other	4.0%

Glascock	Martin	25.0%
	Cagle	72.9%
	Other	2.0%

Glynn	Martin	32.4%
	Cagle	65.3%
	Other	2.3%

Gordon	Martin	29.3%
	Cagle	67.3%
	Other	3.4%

Grady	Martin	42.6%
	Cagle	55.3%
	Other	2.1%

Greene	Martin	37.1%
	Cagle	60.3%
	Other	2.6%

Gwinnett	Martin	34.1%
	Cagle	60.5%
	Other	5.4%

Habersham	Martin	24.0%
	Cagle	72.6%
	Other	3.4%

Hall	Martin	19.9%
	Cagle	76.9%
	Other	3.3%

Hancock	Martin	76.0%
	Cagle	21.9%
	Other	2.2%

Haralson	Martin	30.3%
	Cagle	65.7%
	Other	4.0%

Harris	Martin	28.1%
	Cagle	69.4%
	Other	2.5%

Hart	Martin	48.6%
	Cagle	48.1%
	Other	3.2%

Heard	Martin	30.9%
	Cagle	65.1%
	Other	4.0%

Henry	Martin	37.6%
	Cagle	58.4%
	Other	4.0%

Houston	Martin	34.7%
	Cagle	62.7%
	Other	2.5%

Irwin	Martin	37.9%
	Cagle	61.1%
	Other	1.0%

Jackson	Martin	22.7%
	Cagle	73.3%
	Other	3.9%

Jasper	Martin	36.6%
	Cagle	60.0%
	Other	3.4%

Jeff Davis	Martin	38.0%
	Cagle	60.5%
	Other	1.6%

Jefferson	Martin	53.2%
	Cagle	45.4%
	Other	1.4%

Jenkins	Martin	43.1%
	Cagle	55.0%
	Other	1.9%

Johnson	Martin	37.3%
	Cagle	59.9%
	Other	2.8%

Jones	Martin	39.7%
	Cagle	57.4%
	Other	2.9%

Lamar	Martin	38.2%
	Cagle	59.1%
	Other	2.7%

Lanier	Martin	48.1%
	Cagle	49.9%
	Other	2.0%

Laurens	Martin	42.6%
	Cagle	55.0%
	Other	2.4%

Lee	Martin	29.0%
	Cagle	69.4%
	Other	1.6%

Liberty	Martin	55.8%
	Cagle	42.3%
	Other	1.9%

Lincoln	Martin	36.4%
	Cagle	61.9%
	Other	1.7%

Long	Martin	39.4%
	Cagle	58.5%
	Other	2.1%

Lowndes	Martin	42.5%
	Cagle	55.5%
	Other	2.0%

Lumpkin	Martin	26.2%
	Cagle	68.9%
	Other	4.9%

McDuffie	Martin	36.4%
	Cagle	61.7%
	Other	1.8%

McIntosh	Martin	48.4%
	Cagle	48.9%
	Other	2.7%

Macon	Martin	60.9%
	Cagle	37.4%
	Other	1.7%

Madison	Martin	30.4%
	Cagle	65.8%
	Other	3.8%

Marion	Martin	50.9%
	Cagle	46.8%
	Other	2.4%

Meriwether	Martin	44.7%
	Cagle	52.3%
	Other	3.0%

Miller	Martin	40.1%
	Cagle	57.9%
	Other	2.0%

Mitchell	Martin	48.9%
	Cagle	49.2%
	Other	1.9%

Monroe	Martin	34.9%
	Cagle	62.3%
	Other	2.8%

Montgomery	Martin	38.1%
	Cagle	60.0%
	Other	2.0%

Morgan	Martin	32.5%
	Cagle	64.1%
	Other	3.4%

Murray	Martin	32.6%
	Cagle	64.7%
	Other	2.7%

Muscogee	Martin	51.0%
	Cagle	46.6%
	Other	2.4%

Newton	Martin	41.5%
	Cagle	54.6%
	Other	3.8%

Oconee	Martin	28.9%
	Cagle	66.7%
	Other	4.4%

Oglethorpe	Martin	35.6%
	Cagle	60.1%
	Other	4.3%

Paulding	Martin	26.6%
	Cagle	68.8%
	Other	4.6%

Peach	Martin	45.7%
	Cagle	51.4%
	Other	2.9%

Pickens	Martin	24.0%
	Cagle	71.1%
	Other	4.9%

Pierce	Martin	23.0%
	Cagle	75.7%
	Other	1.3%

Pike	Martin	25.4%
	Cagle	71.0%
	Other	3.6%

Polk	Martin	37.9%
	Cagle	58.7%
	Other	3.4%

Pulaski	Martin	38.2%
	Cagle	59.1%
	Other	2.7%

Putnam	Martin	33.4%
	Cagle	64.2%
	Other	2.3%

Quitman	Martin	53.1%
	Cagle	44.1%
	Other	2.8%

Rabun	Martin	32.2%
	Cagle	64.3%
	Other	3.5%

Randolph	Martin	56.2%
	Cagle	42.6%
	Other	1.2%

Richmond	Martin	53.7%
	Cagle	44.0%
	Other	2.3%

Rockdale	Martin	44.5%
	Cagle	51.1%
	Other	4.4%

Schley	Martin	33.7%
	Cagle	64.6%
	Other	1.7%

Screven	Martin	40.6%
	Cagle	57.8%
	Other	1.6%

Seminole	Martin	49.2%
	Cagle	48.6%
	Other	2.2%

Spalding	Martin	35.2%
	Cagle	61.3%
	Other	3.5%

Stephens	Martin	37.6%
	Cagle	59.8%
	Other	2.6%

Stewart	Martin	60.1%
	Cagle	37.7%
	Other	2.1%

Sumter	Martin	48.3%
	Cagle	49.9%
	Other	1.8%

Talbot	Martin	60.0%
	Cagle	36.0%
	Other	4.0%

Taliaferro	Martin	65.7%
	Cagle	32.4%
	Other	1.9%

Tattnall	Martin	33.8%
	Cagle	64.4%
	Other	1.8%

Taylor	Martin	45.6%
	Cagle	52.4%
	Other	1.9%

Telfair	Martin	52.3%
	Cagle	45.8%
	Other	2.0%

Terrell	Martin	51.0%
	Cagle	47.2%
	Other	1.8%

Thomas	Martin	39.2%
	Cagle	58.5%
	Other	2.3%

Tift	Martin	32.1%
	Cagle	66.0%
	Other	2.0%

Toombs	Martin	35.3%
	Cagle	62.6%
	Other	2.1%

Towns	Martin	30.0%
	Cagle	67.4%
	Other	2.6%

Treutlen	Martin	47.9%
	Cagle	49.9%
	Other	2.2%

Troup	Martin	33.9%
	Cagle	63.9%
	Other	2.2%

Turner	Martin	43.3%
	Cagle	54.0%
	Other	2.7%

Twiggs	Martin	56.3%
	Cagle	40.7%
	Other	3.0%

Union	Martin	30.6%
	Cagle	66.0%
	Other	3.3%

Upson	Martin	37.1%
	Cagle	60.7%
	Other	2.2%

Walker	Martin	32.3%
	Cagle	65.1%
	Other	2.5%

Walton	Martin	22.2%
	Cagle	72.9%
	Other	4.9%

Ware	Martin	36.6%
	Cagle	61.8%
	Other	1.5%

Warren	Martin	51.7%
	Cagle	45.3%
	Other	3.0%

Washington	Martin	50.5%
	Cagle	47.3%
	Other	2.2%

Wayne	Martin	34.3%
	Cagle	63.4%
	Other	2.2%

Webster	Martin	46.2%
	Cagle	51.9%
	Other	2.0%

Wheeler	Martin	47.8%
	Cagle	49.6%
	Other	2.6%

White	Martin	23.0%
	Cagle	73.7%
	Other	3.3%

Whitfield	Martin	29.4%
	Cagle	68.0%
	Other	2.6%

Wilcox	Martin	39.0%
	Cagle	60.1%
	Other	1.0%

Wilkes	Martin	44.5%
	Cagle	52.7%
	Other	2.8%

Wilkinson	Martin	54.2%
	Cagle	43.8%
	Other	2.0%

Worth	Martin	35.1%
	Cagle	63.1%
	Other	1.8%

National DataGraph for 2006 - Georgia Results for 2006

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved