Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-01-03

Map

Map

Aitkin	Swanson	56.1%
	Johnson	38.1%
	Other	5.8%

Anoka	Swanson	49.4%
	Johnson	45.0%
	Other	5.6%

Becker	Swanson	45.4%
	Johnson	50.3%
	Other	4.3%

Beltrami	Swanson	55.4%
	Johnson	39.3%
	Other	5.3%

Benton	Swanson	46.9%
	Johnson	47.2%
	Other	5.8%

Big Stone	Swanson	56.9%
	Johnson	37.7%
	Other	5.4%

Blue Earth	Swanson	53.9%
	Johnson	38.6%
	Other	7.5%

Brown	Swanson	45.5%
	Johnson	47.7%
	Other	6.8%

Carlton	Swanson	68.4%
	Johnson	26.8%
	Other	4.8%

Carver	Swanson	39.0%
	Johnson	55.9%
	Other	5.1%

Cass	Swanson	47.0%
	Johnson	47.3%
	Other	5.6%

Chippewa	Swanson	57.4%
	Johnson	38.5%
	Other	4.1%

Chisago	Swanson	49.4%
	Johnson	44.7%
	Other	5.9%

Clay	Swanson	55.8%
	Johnson	39.9%
	Other	4.3%

Clearwater	Swanson	51.4%
	Johnson	43.0%
	Other	5.6%

Cook	Swanson	59.8%
	Johnson	32.1%
	Other	8.0%

Cottonwood	Swanson	49.0%
	Johnson	46.1%
	Other	4.9%

Crow Wing	Swanson	47.9%
	Johnson	46.7%
	Other	5.4%

Dakota	Swanson	50.4%
	Johnson	44.2%
	Other	5.4%

Dodge	Swanson	45.9%
	Johnson	47.2%
	Other	6.9%

Douglas	Swanson	45.4%
	Johnson	49.7%
	Other	4.9%

Faribault	Swanson	49.8%
	Johnson	43.6%
	Other	6.6%

Fillmore	Swanson	54.2%
	Johnson	39.4%
	Other	6.4%

Freeborn	Swanson	59.2%
	Johnson	35.4%
	Other	5.4%

Goodhue	Swanson	49.2%
	Johnson	45.0%
	Other	5.8%

Grant	Swanson	54.1%
	Johnson	41.5%
	Other	4.4%

Hennepin	Swanson	57.2%
	Johnson	36.2%
	Other	6.6%

Houston	Swanson	50.8%
	Johnson	41.7%
	Other	7.4%

Hubbard	Swanson	46.9%
	Johnson	47.7%
	Other	5.4%

Isanti	Swanson	47.5%
	Johnson	46.8%
	Other	5.7%

Itasca	Swanson	61.7%
	Johnson	33.1%
	Other	5.2%

Jackson	Swanson	49.2%
	Johnson	45.1%
	Other	5.7%

Kanabec	Swanson	51.1%
	Johnson	43.8%
	Other	5.1%

Kandiyohi	Swanson	48.4%
	Johnson	47.0%
	Other	4.6%

Kittson	Swanson	64.7%
	Johnson	31.3%
	Other	4.0%

Koochiching	Swanson	63.9%
	Johnson	30.5%
	Other	5.5%

Lac Qui Parle	Swanson	57.3%
	Johnson	37.9%
	Other	4.8%

Lake	Swanson	67.5%
	Johnson	26.9%
	Other	5.5%

Lake of the Woods	Swanson	50.6%
	Johnson	42.0%
	Other	7.5%

Le Sueur	Swanson	50.7%
	Johnson	43.1%
	Other	6.1%

Lincoln	Swanson	54.1%
	Johnson	40.1%
	Other	5.8%

Lyon	Swanson	47.1%
	Johnson	48.0%
	Other	4.9%

McLeod	Swanson	43.9%
	Johnson	50.3%
	Other	5.8%

Mahnomen	Swanson	62.9%
	Johnson	31.0%
	Other	6.0%

Marshall	Swanson	58.3%
	Johnson	36.9%
	Other	4.9%

Martin	Swanson	43.8%
	Johnson	50.7%
	Other	5.5%

Meeker	Swanson	45.8%
	Johnson	48.1%
	Other	6.1%

Mille Lacs	Swanson	50.0%
	Johnson	44.2%
	Other	5.8%

Morrison	Swanson	47.5%
	Johnson	46.6%
	Other	5.9%

Mower	Swanson	63.6%
	Johnson	31.3%
	Other	5.1%

Murray	Swanson	52.2%
	Johnson	42.7%
	Other	5.1%

Nicollet	Swanson	53.9%
	Johnson	39.9%
	Other	6.2%

Nobles	Swanson	50.8%
	Johnson	44.1%
	Other	5.1%

Norman	Swanson	64.4%
	Johnson	31.0%
	Other	4.6%

Olmsted	Swanson	48.5%
	Johnson	45.3%
	Other	6.3%

Otter Tail	Swanson	45.0%
	Johnson	50.3%
	Other	4.6%

Pennington	Swanson	58.8%
	Johnson	35.8%
	Other	5.4%

Pine	Swanson	56.0%
	Johnson	38.6%
	Other	5.4%

Pipestone	Swanson	43.1%
	Johnson	52.4%
	Other	4.4%

Polk	Swanson	56.8%
	Johnson	39.1%
	Other	4.1%

Pope	Swanson	53.4%
	Johnson	41.0%
	Other	5.5%

Ramsey	Swanson	61.4%
	Johnson	30.9%
	Other	7.7%

Red Lake	Swanson	63.3%
	Johnson	30.4%
	Other	6.3%

Redwood	Swanson	43.3%
	Johnson	51.4%
	Other	5.3%

Renville	Swanson	51.4%
	Johnson	42.6%
	Other	6.1%

Rice	Swanson	54.8%
	Johnson	39.1%
	Other	6.1%

Rock	Swanson	43.3%
	Johnson	50.9%
	Other	5.8%

Roseau	Swanson	47.8%
	Johnson	47.1%
	Other	5.0%

St. Louis	Swanson	70.5%
	Johnson	24.2%
	Other	5.3%

Scott	Swanson	42.5%
	Johnson	51.9%
	Other	5.6%

Sherburne	Swanson	42.0%
	Johnson	52.7%
	Other	5.3%

Sibley	Swanson	46.6%
	Johnson	46.3%
	Other	7.1%

Stearns	Swanson	44.4%
	Johnson	49.6%
	Other	5.9%

Steele	Swanson	46.0%
	Johnson	47.6%
	Other	6.5%

Stevens	Swanson	49.3%
	Johnson	43.8%
	Other	6.9%

Swift	Swanson	59.4%
	Johnson	35.8%
	Other	4.9%

Todd	Swanson	49.1%
	Johnson	44.9%
	Other	6.0%

Traverse	Swanson	56.8%
	Johnson	38.9%
	Other	4.4%

Wabasha	Swanson	50.9%
	Johnson	42.6%
	Other	6.5%

Wadena	Swanson	44.7%
	Johnson	50.4%
	Other	4.9%

Waseca	Swanson	46.5%
	Johnson	45.7%
	Other	7.8%

Washington	Swanson	50.2%
	Johnson	44.1%
	Other	5.6%

Watonwan	Swanson	50.7%
	Johnson	43.3%
	Other	6.0%

Wilkin	Swanson	48.4%
	Johnson	45.4%
	Other	6.2%

Winona	Swanson	53.4%
	Johnson	39.0%
	Other	7.6%

Wright	Swanson	41.9%
	Johnson	52.4%
	Other	5.7%

Yellow Medicine	Swanson	54.7%
	Johnson	40.0%
	Other	5.3%

National DataGraph for 2006 - Minnesota Results for 2006

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved