2006 State Auditor General Election Data Graphs - Missouri
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-01-31

Map

AdairMontee52.0%
 
Thomas45.2%
 
Other2.8%
 


AndrewMontee47.0%
 
Thomas49.5%
 
Other3.5%
 


AtchisonMontee47.4%
 
Thomas48.9%
 
Other3.7%
 


AudrainMontee53.9%
 
Thomas42.7%
 
Other3.4%
 


BarryMontee40.0%
 
Thomas56.0%
 
Other3.9%
 


BartonMontee28.3%
 
Thomas67.5%
 
Other4.2%
 


BatesMontee53.5%
 
Thomas42.3%
 
Other4.3%
 


BentonMontee50.4%
 
Thomas44.8%
 
Other4.8%
 


BollingerMontee40.2%
 
Thomas55.2%
 
Other4.7%
 


BooneMontee56.6%
 
Thomas39.0%
 
Other4.4%
 


BuchananMontee57.6%
 
Thomas38.1%
 
Other4.3%
 


ButlerMontee38.9%
 
Thomas57.3%
 
Other3.8%
 


CaldwellMontee53.7%
 
Thomas41.5%
 
Other4.8%
 


CallawayMontee51.1%
 
Thomas44.6%
 
Other4.3%
 


CamdenMontee41.7%
 
Thomas54.3%
 
Other4.0%
 


Cape GirardeauMontee36.3%
 
Thomas59.5%
 
Other4.2%
 


CarrollMontee47.5%
 
Thomas49.3%
 
Other3.2%
 


CarterMontee47.1%
 
Thomas47.9%
 
Other5.0%
 


CassMontee49.1%
 
Thomas46.9%
 
Other4.0%
 


CedarMontee39.8%
 
Thomas55.1%
 
Other5.0%
 


CharitonMontee58.9%
 
Thomas38.1%
 
Other3.0%
 


ChristianMontee37.1%
 
Thomas59.1%
 
Other3.7%
 


ClarkMontee51.3%
 
Thomas42.9%
 
Other5.8%
 


ClayMontee53.6%
 
Thomas42.3%
 
Other4.2%
 


ClintonMontee56.9%
 
Thomas39.3%
 
Other3.8%
 


ColeMontee43.9%
 
Thomas52.4%
 
Other3.7%
 


CooperMontee49.4%
 
Thomas46.8%
 
Other3.8%
 


CrawfordMontee51.5%
 
Thomas45.2%
 
Other3.3%
 


DadeMontee37.1%
 
Thomas58.4%
 
Other4.5%
 


DallasMontee44.9%
 
Thomas49.9%
 
Other5.2%
 


DaviessMontee56.0%
 
Thomas39.9%
 
Other4.2%
 


DeKalbMontee52.1%
 
Thomas43.7%
 
Other4.2%
 


DentMontee42.6%
 
Thomas53.2%
 
Other4.2%
 


DouglasMontee35.7%
 
Thomas59.6%
 
Other4.7%
 


DunklinMontee55.9%
 
Thomas41.2%
 
Other2.9%
 


FranklinMontee51.6%
 
Thomas44.5%
 
Other4.0%
 


GasconadeMontee43.6%
 
Thomas53.1%
 
Other3.3%
 


GentryMontee54.9%
 
Thomas38.9%
 
Other6.1%
 


GreeneMontee44.6%
 
Thomas51.6%
 
Other3.8%
 


GrundyMontee48.1%
 
Thomas45.7%
 
Other6.3%
 


HarrisonMontee45.0%
 
Thomas50.3%
 
Other4.6%
 


HenryMontee56.8%
 
Thomas38.7%
 
Other4.5%
 


HickoryMontee50.9%
 
Thomas43.8%
 
Other5.3%
 


HoltMontee44.9%
 
Thomas51.5%
 
Other3.6%
 


HowardMontee59.5%
 
Thomas36.2%
 
Other4.3%
 


HowellMontee40.6%
 
Thomas55.3%
 
Other4.1%
 


IronMontee63.2%
 
Thomas32.6%
 
Other4.2%
 


JacksonMontee63.4%
 
Thomas33.0%
 
Other3.6%
 


JasperMontee33.1%
 
Thomas63.5%
 
Other3.4%
 


JeffersonMontee57.4%
 
Thomas38.8%
 
Other3.9%
 


JohnsonMontee51.1%
 
Thomas44.3%
 
Other4.6%
 


KnoxMontee49.8%
 
Thomas47.3%
 
Other2.8%
 


LacledeMontee38.7%
 
Thomas57.6%
 
Other3.7%
 


LafayetteMontee52.5%
 
Thomas44.3%
 
Other3.2%
 


LawrenceMontee40.0%
 
Thomas56.2%
 
Other3.8%
 


LewisMontee50.1%
 
Thomas45.3%
 
Other4.6%
 


LincolnMontee54.9%
 
Thomas41.1%
 
Other4.1%
 


LinnMontee56.7%
 
Thomas38.8%
 
Other4.4%
 


LivingstonMontee53.7%
 
Thomas43.3%
 
Other3.0%
 


McDonaldMontee35.1%
 
Thomas59.8%
 
Other5.1%
 


MaconMontee51.8%
 
Thomas45.7%
 
Other2.5%
 


MadisonMontee48.1%
 
Thomas47.2%
 
Other4.7%
 


MariesMontee50.4%
 
Thomas46.0%
 
Other3.6%
 


MarionMontee46.6%
 
Thomas49.4%
 
Other4.1%
 


MercerMontee42.6%
 
Thomas50.6%
 
Other6.8%
 


MillerMontee38.1%
 
Thomas57.2%
 
Other4.7%
 


MississippiMontee57.1%
 
Thomas38.8%
 
Other4.1%
 


MoniteauMontee45.3%
 
Thomas50.5%
 
Other4.2%
 


MonroeMontee56.8%
 
Thomas40.4%
 
Other2.8%
 


MontgomeryMontee51.3%
 
Thomas44.5%
 
Other4.2%
 


MorganMontee47.1%
 
Thomas48.7%
 
Other4.2%
 


New MadridMontee58.4%
 
Thomas37.4%
 
Other4.3%
 


NewtonMontee31.4%
 
Thomas64.2%
 
Other4.4%
 


NodawayMontee53.9%
 
Thomas42.3%
 
Other3.8%
 


OregonMontee52.6%
 
Thomas41.8%
 
Other5.5%
 


OsageMontee44.7%
 
Thomas52.0%
 
Other3.3%
 


OzarkMontee41.7%
 
Thomas52.7%
 
Other5.6%
 


PemiscotMontee56.7%
 
Thomas38.4%
 
Other5.0%
 


PerryMontee39.6%
 
Thomas56.4%
 
Other4.0%
 


PettisMontee49.6%
 
Thomas46.1%
 
Other4.2%
 


PhelpsMontee46.0%
 
Thomas50.1%
 
Other3.9%
 


PikeMontee59.8%
 
Thomas37.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


PlatteMontee52.0%
 
Thomas44.6%
 
Other3.5%
 


PolkMontee40.1%
 
Thomas55.8%
 
Other4.1%
 


PulaskiMontee40.6%
 
Thomas55.1%
 
Other4.3%
 


PutnamMontee34.0%
 
Thomas61.1%
 
Other4.9%
 


RallsMontee54.6%
 
Thomas41.8%
 
Other3.6%
 


RandolphMontee54.5%
 
Thomas41.9%
 
Other3.5%
 


RayMontee61.3%
 
Thomas34.6%
 
Other4.1%
 


ReynoldsMontee62.1%
 
Thomas32.2%
 
Other5.7%
 


RipleyMontee48.7%
 
Thomas46.0%
 
Other5.3%
 


St. CharlesMontee47.4%
 
Thomas48.7%
 
Other3.8%
 


St. ClairMontee51.4%
 
Thomas44.3%
 
Other4.3%
 


Ste. GenevieveMontee63.4%
 
Thomas33.7%
 
Other2.9%
 


St. FrancoisMontee58.5%
 
Thomas38.4%
 
Other3.2%
 


St. LouisMontee56.9%
 
Thomas40.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


SalineMontee59.1%
 
Thomas37.1%
 
Other3.8%
 


SchuylerMontee53.4%
 
Thomas42.2%
 
Other4.4%
 


ScotlandMontee49.5%
 
Thomas45.9%
 
Other4.6%
 


ScottMontee45.6%
 
Thomas49.6%
 
Other4.8%
 


ShannonMontee54.6%
 
Thomas40.4%
 
Other5.0%
 


ShelbyMontee53.2%
 
Thomas44.2%
 
Other2.6%
 


StoddardMontee43.9%
 
Thomas51.5%
 
Other4.6%
 


StoneMontee39.4%
 
Thomas56.6%
 
Other4.0%
 


SullivanMontee49.1%
 
Thomas47.4%
 
Other3.5%
 


TaneyMontee37.3%
 
Thomas58.9%
 
Other3.9%
 


TexasMontee47.1%
 
Thomas48.8%
 
Other4.2%
 


VernonMontee44.1%
 
Thomas52.0%
 
Other3.8%
 


WarrenMontee49.7%
 
Thomas47.0%
 
Other3.3%
 


WashingtonMontee62.9%
 
Thomas34.1%
 
Other3.0%
 


WayneMontee51.4%
 
Thomas44.3%
 
Other4.3%
 


WebsterMontee41.1%
 
Thomas54.5%
 
Other4.5%
 


WorthMontee36.6%
 
Thomas28.8%
 
Other34.7%
 


WrightMontee34.5%
 
Thomas61.6%
 
Other3.9%
 


City

St. LouisMontee79.2%
 
Thomas17.0%
 
Other3.7%
 



National DataGraph for 2006 - Missouri Results for 2006

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved