Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alamance	Perdue	47.8%
	McCrory	48.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Alexander	Perdue	32.9%
	McCrory	65.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Alleghany	Perdue	49.3%
	McCrory	46.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Anson	Perdue	63.2%
	McCrory	35.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Ashe	Perdue	43.0%
	McCrory	54.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Avery	Perdue	27.7%
	McCrory	69.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Beaufort	Perdue	54.5%
	McCrory	43.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Bertie	Perdue	76.4%
	McCrory	22.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Bladen	Perdue	64.8%
	McCrory	33.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Brunswick	Perdue	45.0%
	McCrory	50.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Buncombe	Perdue	57.2%
	McCrory	38.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Burke	Perdue	41.7%
	McCrory	56.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Cabarrus	Perdue	34.8%
	McCrory	63.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Caldwell	Perdue	34.6%
	McCrory	62.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Camden	Perdue	46.8%
	McCrory	50.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Carteret	Perdue	46.5%
	McCrory	50.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Caswell	Perdue	59.4%
	McCrory	38.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Catawba	Perdue	33.1%
	McCrory	64.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Chatham	Perdue	53.0%
	McCrory	43.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Cherokee	Perdue	41.5%
	McCrory	55.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Chowan	Perdue	60.5%
	McCrory	37.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Clay	Perdue	39.7%
	McCrory	57.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Cleveland	Perdue	41.9%
	McCrory	56.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Columbus	Perdue	64.9%
	McCrory	32.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Craven	Perdue	56.8%
	McCrory	40.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Cumberland	Perdue	61.9%
	McCrory	35.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Currituck	Perdue	43.0%
	McCrory	53.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Dare	Perdue	52.3%
	McCrory	44.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Davidson	Perdue	38.5%
	McCrory	57.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Davie	Perdue	35.0%
	McCrory	61.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Duplin	Perdue	59.3%
	McCrory	38.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Durham	Perdue	70.6%
	McCrory	25.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Edgecombe	Perdue	72.8%
	McCrory	26.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Forsyth	Perdue	54.9%
	McCrory	42.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Franklin	Perdue	52.4%
	McCrory	44.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Gaston	Perdue	34.8%
	McCrory	63.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Gates	Perdue	60.3%
	McCrory	38.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Graham	Perdue	44.6%
	McCrory	52.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Granville	Perdue	55.7%
	McCrory	41.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Greene	Perdue	61.8%
	McCrory	36.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Guilford	Perdue	57.4%
	McCrory	39.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Halifax	Perdue	71.1%
	McCrory	27.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Harnett	Perdue	46.8%
	McCrory	50.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Haywood	Perdue	54.1%
	McCrory	42.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Henderson	Perdue	41.4%
	McCrory	55.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Hertford	Perdue	77.2%
	McCrory	22.0%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Hoke	Perdue	64.2%
	McCrory	33.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Hyde	Perdue	66.1%
	McCrory	31.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Iredell	Perdue	32.8%
	McCrory	65.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Jackson	Perdue	56.7%
	McCrory	39.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Johnston	Perdue	41.7%
	McCrory	55.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Jones	Perdue	62.3%
	McCrory	35.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Lee	Perdue	49.8%
	McCrory	47.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Lenoir	Perdue	64.5%
	McCrory	34.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Lincoln	Perdue	30.0%
	McCrory	67.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

McDowell	Perdue	45.0%
	McCrory	50.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Macon	Perdue	46.1%
	McCrory	49.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Madison	Perdue	54.6%
	McCrory	41.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Martin	Perdue	69.5%
	McCrory	29.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Mecklenburg	Perdue	49.0%
	McCrory	48.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Mitchell	Perdue	31.8%
	McCrory	64.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Montgomery	Perdue	50.2%
	McCrory	47.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Moore	Perdue	39.1%
	McCrory	58.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Nash	Perdue	54.9%
	McCrory	43.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

New Hanover	Perdue	49.5%
	McCrory	46.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Northampton	Perdue	72.9%
	McCrory	25.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Onslow	Perdue	50.0%
	McCrory	46.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Orange	Perdue	65.1%
	McCrory	30.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Pamlico	Perdue	59.5%
	McCrory	38.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Pasquotank	Perdue	64.4%
	McCrory	33.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Pender	Perdue	46.9%
	McCrory	48.0%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

Perquimans	Perdue	54.4%
	McCrory	43.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Person	Perdue	52.3%
	McCrory	45.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Pitt	Perdue	59.4%
	McCrory	38.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Polk	Perdue	47.3%
	McCrory	48.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Randolph	Perdue	33.3%
	McCrory	62.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Richmond	Perdue	56.7%
	McCrory	41.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Robeson	Perdue	70.6%
	McCrory	27.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Rockingham	Perdue	49.6%
	McCrory	46.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Rowan	Perdue	36.7%
	McCrory	60.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Rutherford	Perdue	42.5%
	McCrory	54.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Sampson	Perdue	52.7%
	McCrory	45.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Scotland	Perdue	63.3%
	McCrory	35.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Stanly	Perdue	31.7%
	McCrory	66.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Stokes	Perdue	40.6%
	McCrory	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Surry	Perdue	44.7%
	McCrory	52.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Swain	Perdue	59.3%
	McCrory	37.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Transylvania	Perdue	46.9%
	McCrory	49.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Tyrrell	Perdue	68.3%
	McCrory	29.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Union	Perdue	29.5%
	McCrory	68.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Vance	Perdue	67.7%
	McCrory	30.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Wake	Perdue	51.2%
	McCrory	45.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Warren	Perdue	71.4%
	McCrory	27.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Washington	Perdue	73.3%
	McCrory	25.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Watauga	Perdue	48.2%
	McCrory	47.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Wayne	Perdue	52.2%
	McCrory	45.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Wilkes	Perdue	39.5%
	McCrory	56.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Wilson	Perdue	57.5%
	McCrory	41.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Yadkin	Perdue	35.6%
	McCrory	60.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Yancey	Perdue	53.0%
	McCrory	44.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

National DataGraph for 2008 - North Carolina Results for 2008

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved