Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2011-01-10

Map

Map

Autauga	Joseph	23.5%
	Shaw	76.4%
	Other	0.1%

Baldwin	Joseph	18.4%
	Shaw	81.6%
	Other	0.1%

Barbour	Joseph	51.9%
	Shaw	48.0%
	Other	0.1%

Bibb	Joseph	27.9%
	Shaw	72.0%
	Other	0.1%

Blount	Joseph	15.7%
	Shaw	84.2%
	Other	0.1%

Bullock	Joseph	73.2%
	Shaw	26.8%

Butler	Joseph	44.2%
	Shaw	55.8%
	Other	0.1%

Calhoun	Joseph	32.3%
	Shaw	67.5%
	Other	0.1%

Chambers	Joseph	47.0%
	Shaw	53.0%
	Other	0.1%

Cherokee	Joseph	34.5%
	Shaw	65.4%
	Other	0.1%

Chilton	Joseph	22.4%
	Shaw	77.5%
	Other	0.1%

Choctaw	Joseph	53.9%
	Shaw	46.0%
	Other	0.0%

Clarke	Joseph	47.1%
	Shaw	52.8%
	Other	0.1%

Clay	Joseph	31.9%
	Shaw	68.0%
	Other	0.1%

Cleburne	Joseph	22.8%
	Shaw	77.1%
	Other	0.1%

Coffee	Joseph	25.3%
	Shaw	74.5%
	Other	0.2%

Colbert	Joseph	44.4%
	Shaw	55.5%
	Other	0.1%

Conecuh	Joseph	52.2%
	Shaw	47.6%
	Other	0.1%

Coosa	Joseph	46.6%
	Shaw	53.3%
	Other	0.1%

Covington	Joseph	22.5%
	Shaw	77.3%
	Other	0.1%

Crenshaw	Joseph	34.9%
	Shaw	64.9%
	Other	0.2%

Cullman	Joseph	22.7%
	Shaw	77.2%
	Other	0.1%

Dale	Joseph	26.9%
	Shaw	73.1%
	Other	0.1%

Dallas	Joseph	68.1%
	Shaw	31.8%
	Other	0.1%

DeKalb	Joseph	32.0%
	Shaw	68.0%

Elmore	Joseph	22.1%
	Shaw	77.8%
	Other	0.1%

Escambia	Joseph	35.5%
	Shaw	64.3%
	Other	0.1%

Etowah	Joseph	35.7%
	Shaw	64.2%
	Other	0.1%

Fayette	Joseph	32.3%
	Shaw	67.7%
	Other	0.1%

Franklin	Joseph	41.9%
	Shaw	58.0%
	Other	0.2%

Geneva	Joseph	21.7%
	Shaw	78.0%
	Other	0.3%

Greene	Joseph	83.8%
	Shaw	16.2%
	Other	0.0%

Hale	Joseph	63.7%
	Shaw	36.3%
	Other	0.0%

Henry	Joseph	36.8%
	Shaw	63.0%
	Other	0.1%

Houston	Joseph	29.8%
	Shaw	70.1%
	Other	0.1%

Jackson	Joseph	37.1%
	Shaw	62.8%
	Other	0.1%

Jefferson	Joseph	47.7%
	Shaw	52.2%
	Other	0.1%

Lamar	Joseph	30.0%
	Shaw	69.9%
	Other	0.1%

Lauderdale	Joseph	37.6%
	Shaw	62.3%
	Other	0.1%

Lawrence	Joseph	43.7%
	Shaw	56.2%
	Other	0.1%

Lee	Joseph	36.9%
	Shaw	62.9%
	Other	0.2%

Limestone	Joseph	28.4%
	Shaw	71.5%
	Other	0.1%

Lowndes	Joseph	71.9%
	Shaw	28.1%

Macon	Joseph	85.7%
	Shaw	14.3%
	Other	0.0%

Madison	Joseph	35.9%
	Shaw	64.0%
	Other	0.1%

Marengo	Joseph	53.7%
	Shaw	46.2%
	Other	0.1%

Marion	Joseph	30.7%
	Shaw	69.2%
	Other	0.1%

Marshall	Joseph	22.5%
	Shaw	77.4%
	Other	0.1%

Mobile	Joseph	41.3%
	Shaw	58.7%
	Other	0.0%

Monroe	Joseph	42.5%
	Shaw	57.4%
	Other	0.1%

Montgomery	Joseph	54.0%
	Shaw	45.9%
	Other	0.1%

Morgan	Joseph	25.7%
	Shaw	74.2%
	Other	0.1%

Perry	Joseph	73.0%
	Shaw	27.0%
	Other	0.0%

Pickens	Joseph	46.3%
	Shaw	53.6%
	Other	0.1%

Pike	Joseph	39.0%
	Shaw	60.9%
	Other	0.1%

Randolph	Joseph	33.2%
	Shaw	66.8%
	Other	0.0%

Russell	Joseph	54.4%
	Shaw	45.5%
	Other	0.1%

St. Clair	Joseph	17.5%
	Shaw	82.4%
	Other	0.1%

Shelby	Joseph	17.6%
	Shaw	82.3%
	Other	0.1%

Sumter	Joseph	76.0%
	Shaw	24.0%
	Other	0.0%

Talladega	Joseph	40.1%
	Shaw	59.8%
	Other	0.1%

Tallapoosa	Joseph	34.8%
	Shaw	65.2%

Tuscaloosa	Joseph	38.1%
	Shaw	61.8%
	Other	0.1%

Walker	Joseph	33.5%
	Shaw	66.4%
	Other	0.1%

Washington	Joseph	41.5%
	Shaw	58.5%
	Other	0.1%

Wilcox	Joseph	73.4%
	Shaw	26.6%
	Other	0.0%

Winston	Joseph	20.5%
	Shaw	79.3%
	Other	0.2%

National DataGraph for 2010 - Alabama Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved