Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2010-08-07

Map

Map

Alcona	Hoekstra	18.6%
	Snyder	29.6%
	Cox	37.2%
	Other	14.5%

Alger	Hoekstra	18.0%
	Snyder	40.6%
	Cox	31.2%
	Other	10.2%

Allegan	Hoekstra	42.3%
	Snyder	30.6%
	Cox	20.0%
	Other	7.1%

Alpena	Hoekstra	21.2%
	Snyder	21.1%
	Cox	46.1%
	Other	11.5%

Antrim	Hoekstra	24.9%
	Snyder	42.2%
	Cox	24.0%
	Other	9.0%

Arenac	Hoekstra	17.6%
	Snyder	49.3%
	Cox	24.2%
	Other	8.8%

Baraga	Hoekstra	19.3%
	Snyder	42.2%
	Cox	31.1%
	Other	7.4%

Barry	Hoekstra	22.9%
	Snyder	42.7%
	Cox	26.6%
	Other	7.8%

Bay	Hoekstra	18.4%
	Snyder	44.3%
	Cox	28.2%
	Other	9.1%

Benzie	Hoekstra	33.7%
	Snyder	37.5%
	Cox	21.3%
	Other	7.5%

Berrien	Hoekstra	52.8%
	Snyder	9.9%
	Cox	24.6%
	Other	12.7%

Branch	Hoekstra	20.2%
	Snyder	41.7%
	Cox	28.8%
	Other	9.2%

Calhoun	Hoekstra	19.2%
	Snyder	44.9%
	Cox	28.6%
	Other	7.2%

Cass	Hoekstra	43.0%
	Snyder	14.1%
	Cox	28.9%
	Other	14.1%

Charlevoix	Hoekstra	29.5%
	Snyder	38.7%
	Cox	22.1%
	Other	9.7%

Cheboygan	Hoekstra	22.7%
	Snyder	41.3%
	Cox	26.0%
	Other	10.0%

Chippewa	Hoekstra	23.5%
	Snyder	35.1%
	Cox	31.2%
	Other	10.1%

Clare	Hoekstra	21.7%
	Snyder	40.5%
	Cox	27.3%
	Other	10.6%

Clinton	Hoekstra	27.9%
	Snyder	39.8%
	Cox	25.3%
	Other	7.0%

Crawford	Hoekstra	19.5%
	Snyder	48.2%
	Cox	21.8%
	Other	10.5%

Delta	Hoekstra	23.0%
	Snyder	29.8%
	Cox	36.9%
	Other	10.2%

Dickinson	Hoekstra	19.9%
	Snyder	31.3%
	Cox	38.4%
	Other	10.4%

Eaton	Hoekstra	25.4%
	Snyder	40.0%
	Cox	26.3%
	Other	8.3%

Emmet	Hoekstra	29.4%
	Snyder	38.3%
	Cox	23.1%
	Other	9.2%

Genesee	Hoekstra	21.2%
	Snyder	37.7%
	Cox	30.0%
	Other	11.1%

Gladwin	Hoekstra	14.3%
	Snyder	44.3%
	Cox	27.9%
	Other	13.5%

Gogebic	Hoekstra	21.0%
	Snyder	21.4%
	Cox	40.2%
	Other	17.4%

Grand Traverse	Hoekstra	25.8%
	Snyder	39.1%
	Cox	26.7%
	Other	8.3%

Gratiot	Hoekstra	21.7%
	Snyder	42.1%
	Cox	28.0%
	Other	8.3%

Hillsdale	Hoekstra	26.6%
	Snyder	30.7%
	Cox	32.3%
	Other	10.5%

Houghton	Hoekstra	26.7%
	Snyder	31.0%
	Cox	33.3%
	Other	9.0%

Huron	Hoekstra	19.1%
	Snyder	43.3%
	Cox	26.7%
	Other	11.0%

Ingham	Hoekstra	24.3%
	Snyder	43.3%
	Cox	24.1%
	Other	8.3%

Ionia	Hoekstra	28.6%
	Snyder	38.7%
	Cox	25.6%
	Other	7.1%

Iosco	Hoekstra	16.8%
	Snyder	43.1%
	Cox	26.9%
	Other	13.2%

Iron	Hoekstra	19.3%
	Snyder	32.0%
	Cox	37.4%
	Other	11.3%

Isabella	Hoekstra	20.5%
	Snyder	40.6%
	Cox	26.9%
	Other	12.0%

Jackson	Hoekstra	22.3%
	Snyder	39.5%
	Cox	27.2%
	Other	11.1%

Kalamazoo	Hoekstra	20.6%
	Snyder	34.9%
	Cox	23.2%
	Other	21.3%

Kalkaska	Hoekstra	19.3%
	Snyder	42.6%
	Cox	29.9%
	Other	8.1%

Kent	Hoekstra	41.4%
	Snyder	29.8%
	Cox	21.1%
	Other	7.7%

Keweenaw	Hoekstra	29.1%
	Snyder	24.2%
	Cox	32.9%
	Other	13.8%

Lake	Hoekstra	33.4%
	Snyder	38.4%
	Cox	21.7%
	Other	6.5%

Lapeer	Hoekstra	23.8%
	Snyder	35.3%
	Cox	23.9%
	Other	17.0%

Leelanau	Hoekstra	28.5%
	Snyder	35.9%
	Cox	26.3%
	Other	9.3%

Lenawee	Hoekstra	29.7%
	Snyder	22.4%
	Cox	33.7%
	Other	14.2%

Livingston	Hoekstra	23.9%
	Snyder	40.0%
	Cox	22.2%
	Other	14.0%

Luce	Hoekstra	24.2%
	Snyder	37.1%
	Cox	27.2%
	Other	11.5%

Mackinac	Hoekstra	25.5%
	Snyder	38.4%
	Cox	26.3%
	Other	9.7%

Macomb	Hoekstra	20.5%
	Snyder	39.2%
	Cox	21.0%
	Other	19.3%

Manistee	Hoekstra	40.8%
	Snyder	33.0%
	Cox	18.4%
	Other	7.8%

Marquette	Hoekstra	21.1%
	Snyder	41.9%
	Cox	30.8%
	Other	6.2%

Mason	Hoekstra	52.7%
	Snyder	28.7%
	Cox	13.7%
	Other	4.8%

Mecosta	Hoekstra	26.8%
	Snyder	36.7%
	Cox	27.6%
	Other	8.9%

Menominee	Hoekstra	30.1%
	Snyder	16.3%
	Cox	34.3%
	Other	19.4%

Midland	Hoekstra	20.1%
	Snyder	46.7%
	Cox	23.7%
	Other	9.5%

Missaukee	Hoekstra	31.7%
	Snyder	32.0%
	Cox	29.5%
	Other	6.7%

Monroe	Hoekstra	23.6%
	Snyder	29.9%
	Cox	30.6%
	Other	15.8%

Montcalm	Hoekstra	23.2%
	Snyder	41.8%
	Cox	28.1%
	Other	7.0%

Montmorency	Hoekstra	22.1%
	Snyder	38.5%
	Cox	25.6%
	Other	13.8%

Muskegon	Hoekstra	43.8%
	Snyder	29.8%
	Cox	21.6%
	Other	4.8%

Newaygo	Hoekstra	39.0%
	Snyder	32.1%
	Cox	23.4%
	Other	5.5%

Oakland	Hoekstra	20.4%
	Snyder	36.4%
	Cox	16.6%
	Other	26.6%

Oceana	Hoekstra	46.8%
	Snyder	30.8%
	Cox	17.9%
	Other	4.6%

Ogemaw	Hoekstra	17.7%
	Snyder	41.8%
	Cox	28.6%
	Other	11.9%

Ontonagon	Hoekstra	17.6%
	Snyder	35.0%
	Cox	34.6%
	Other	12.8%

Osceola	Hoekstra	27.7%
	Snyder	39.7%
	Cox	25.4%
	Other	7.2%

Oscoda	Hoekstra	21.2%
	Snyder	39.0%
	Cox	30.1%
	Other	9.8%

Otsego	Hoekstra	23.0%
	Snyder	42.3%
	Cox	24.0%
	Other	10.7%

Ottawa	Hoekstra	59.3%
	Snyder	21.6%
	Cox	14.8%
	Other	4.4%

Presque Isle	Hoekstra	28.7%
	Snyder	34.0%
	Cox	26.7%
	Other	10.6%

Roscommon	Hoekstra	19.3%
	Snyder	44.7%
	Cox	24.3%
	Other	11.7%

Saginaw	Hoekstra	19.8%
	Snyder	41.8%
	Cox	28.7%
	Other	9.7%

St. Clair	Hoekstra	19.3%
	Snyder	39.2%
	Cox	24.3%
	Other	17.2%

St. Joseph	Hoekstra	18.2%
	Snyder	39.5%
	Cox	29.9%
	Other	12.4%

Sanilac	Hoekstra	24.1%
	Snyder	37.1%
	Cox	22.8%
	Other	16.0%

Schoolcraft	Hoekstra	17.3%
	Snyder	37.2%
	Cox	32.6%
	Other	12.9%

Shiawassee	Hoekstra	17.8%
	Snyder	38.7%
	Cox	32.2%
	Other	11.3%

Tuscola	Hoekstra	22.5%
	Snyder	38.7%
	Cox	28.8%
	Other	10.0%

Van Buren	Hoekstra	19.1%
	Snyder	38.4%
	Cox	26.9%
	Other	15.6%

Washtenaw	Hoekstra	19.5%
	Snyder	49.0%
	Cox	19.3%
	Other	12.2%

Wayne	Hoekstra	19.3%
	Snyder	42.0%
	Cox	23.3%
	Other	15.4%

Wexford	Hoekstra	34.4%
	Snyder	36.2%
	Cox	21.7%
	Other	7.7%

National DataGraph for 2010 - Michigan Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved