Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2010-06-17

Map

Map

Alameda	Eastman	32.1%
	Cooley	46.4%
	Harman	21.6%

Alpine	Eastman	40.6%
	Cooley	41.3%
	Harman	18.1%

Amador	Eastman	34.1%
	Cooley	48.3%
	Harman	17.6%

Butte	Eastman	38.8%
	Cooley	38.1%
	Harman	23.1%

Calaveras	Eastman	41.6%
	Cooley	41.3%
	Harman	17.1%

Colusa	Eastman	33.9%
	Cooley	38.5%
	Harman	27.6%

Contra Costa	Eastman	31.2%
	Cooley	44.5%
	Harman	24.4%

Del Norte	Eastman	39.1%
	Cooley	46.7%
	Harman	14.2%

El Dorado	Eastman	37.5%
	Cooley	45.7%
	Harman	16.8%

Fresno	Eastman	45.4%
	Cooley	34.3%
	Harman	20.3%

Glenn	Eastman	35.1%
	Cooley	41.5%
	Harman	23.5%

Humboldt	Eastman	39.7%
	Cooley	44.8%
	Harman	15.6%

Imperial	Eastman	32.3%
	Cooley	39.0%
	Harman	28.7%

Inyo	Eastman	33.9%
	Cooley	46.8%
	Harman	19.3%

Kern	Eastman	32.4%
	Cooley	43.0%
	Harman	24.6%

Kings	Eastman	42.4%
	Cooley	40.7%
	Harman	16.9%

Lake	Eastman	31.9%
	Cooley	55.1%
	Harman	13.1%

Lassen	Eastman	34.0%
	Cooley	50.8%
	Harman	15.2%

Los Angeles	Eastman	28.0%
	Cooley	58.2%
	Harman	13.8%

Madera	Eastman	44.0%
	Cooley	37.5%
	Harman	18.5%

Marin	Eastman	28.6%
	Cooley	51.6%
	Harman	19.8%

Mariposa	Eastman	44.9%
	Cooley	37.9%
	Harman	17.2%

Mendocino	Eastman	34.6%
	Cooley	48.9%
	Harman	16.6%

Merced	Eastman	34.3%
	Cooley	43.0%
	Harman	22.7%

Modoc	Eastman	43.0%
	Cooley	32.7%
	Harman	24.4%

Mono	Eastman	43.6%
	Cooley	39.9%
	Harman	16.5%

Monterey	Eastman	32.6%
	Cooley	53.2%
	Harman	14.3%

Napa	Eastman	32.3%
	Cooley	50.3%
	Harman	17.4%

Nevada	Eastman	37.4%
	Cooley	40.5%
	Harman	22.1%

Orange	Eastman	36.0%
	Cooley	39.8%
	Harman	24.2%

Placer	Eastman	36.8%
	Cooley	46.5%
	Harman	16.7%

Plumas	Eastman	33.7%
	Cooley	51.2%
	Harman	15.1%

Riverside	Eastman	34.2%
	Cooley	49.1%
	Harman	16.7%

Sacramento	Eastman	37.1%
	Cooley	44.1%
	Harman	18.9%

San Benito	Eastman	32.8%
	Cooley	51.8%
	Harman	15.4%

San Bernardino	Eastman	35.1%
	Cooley	50.5%
	Harman	14.4%

San Diego	Eastman	37.8%
	Cooley	43.5%
	Harman	18.7%

San Francisco	Eastman	28.1%
	Cooley	54.1%
	Harman	17.8%

San Joaquin	Eastman	31.4%
	Cooley	41.3%
	Harman	27.4%

San Luis Obispo	Eastman	32.5%
	Cooley	48.1%
	Harman	19.5%

San Mateo	Eastman	32.2%
	Cooley	52.1%
	Harman	15.7%

Santa Barbara	Eastman	34.2%
	Cooley	46.0%
	Harman	19.7%

Santa Clara	Eastman	34.0%
	Cooley	49.7%
	Harman	16.4%

Santa Cruz	Eastman	35.5%
	Cooley	51.9%
	Harman	12.6%

Shasta	Eastman	38.8%
	Cooley	37.8%
	Harman	23.3%

Sierra	Eastman	49.9%
	Cooley	30.9%
	Harman	19.2%

Siskiyou	Eastman	38.6%
	Cooley	41.2%
	Harman	20.2%

Solano	Eastman	32.9%
	Cooley	47.4%
	Harman	19.7%

Sonoma	Eastman	31.6%
	Cooley	53.7%
	Harman	14.7%

Stanislaus	Eastman	37.3%
	Cooley	42.8%
	Harman	19.9%

Sutter	Eastman	35.5%
	Cooley	42.7%
	Harman	21.8%

Tehama	Eastman	40.1%
	Cooley	35.9%
	Harman	24.0%

Trinity	Eastman	44.9%
	Cooley	35.5%
	Harman	19.6%

Tulare	Eastman	34.0%
	Cooley	47.7%
	Harman	18.3%

Tuolumne	Eastman	37.3%
	Cooley	43.0%
	Harman	19.8%

Ventura	Eastman	35.7%
	Cooley	48.9%
	Harman	15.4%

Yolo	Eastman	32.9%
	Cooley	48.9%
	Harman	18.2%

Yuba	Eastman	40.1%
	Cooley	41.9%
	Harman	18.0%

National DataGraph for 2010 - California Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved