Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alcona	Stabenow	50.5%
	Hoekstra	46.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Alger	Stabenow	56.6%
	Hoekstra	39.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Allegan	Stabenow	41.9%
	Hoekstra	54.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Alpena	Stabenow	56.9%
	Hoekstra	40.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Antrim	Stabenow	44.3%
	Hoekstra	52.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Arenac	Stabenow	57.6%
	Hoekstra	38.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Baraga	Stabenow	56.3%
	Hoekstra	40.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Barry	Stabenow	44.7%
	Hoekstra	51.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Bay	Stabenow	60.6%
	Hoekstra	36.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Benzie	Stabenow	52.3%
	Hoekstra	44.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Berrien	Stabenow	46.3%
	Hoekstra	50.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Branch	Stabenow	46.1%
	Hoekstra	50.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Calhoun	Stabenow	54.4%
	Hoekstra	42.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Cass	Stabenow	43.0%
	Hoekstra	53.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Charlevoix	Stabenow	47.4%
	Hoekstra	49.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Cheboygan	Stabenow	52.3%
	Hoekstra	44.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Chippewa	Stabenow	55.7%
	Hoekstra	40.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Clare	Stabenow	58.3%
	Hoekstra	37.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Clinton	Stabenow	52.6%
	Hoekstra	44.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Crawford	Stabenow	53.0%
	Hoekstra	43.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Delta	Stabenow	55.7%
	Hoekstra	41.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Dickinson	Stabenow	49.4%
	Hoekstra	47.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Eaton	Stabenow	56.3%
	Hoekstra	40.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Emmet	Stabenow	45.8%
	Hoekstra	50.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Genesee	Stabenow	68.6%
	Hoekstra	28.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Gladwin	Stabenow	57.0%
	Hoekstra	39.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Gogebic	Stabenow	60.2%
	Hoekstra	36.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Grand Traverse	Stabenow	46.9%
	Hoekstra	49.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Gratiot	Stabenow	56.8%
	Hoekstra	40.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Hillsdale	Stabenow	44.1%
	Hoekstra	51.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Houghton	Stabenow	51.3%
	Hoekstra	45.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Huron	Stabenow	60.1%
	Hoekstra	37.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Ingham	Stabenow	67.1%
	Hoekstra	29.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Ionia	Stabenow	48.8%
	Hoekstra	47.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Iosco	Stabenow	57.5%
	Hoekstra	38.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Iron	Stabenow	54.6%
	Hoekstra	41.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Isabella	Stabenow	60.6%
	Hoekstra	35.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Jackson	Stabenow	52.4%
	Hoekstra	44.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Kalamazoo	Stabenow	57.1%
	Hoekstra	39.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Kalkaska	Stabenow	47.2%
	Hoekstra	48.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Kent	Stabenow	46.6%
	Hoekstra	50.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Keweenaw	Stabenow	50.7%
	Hoekstra	45.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Lake	Stabenow	57.4%
	Hoekstra	38.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Lapeer	Stabenow	52.0%
	Hoekstra	44.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Leelanau	Stabenow	50.4%
	Hoekstra	47.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Lenawee	Stabenow	52.2%
	Hoekstra	43.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Livingston	Stabenow	43.3%
	Hoekstra	53.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Luce	Stabenow	51.1%
	Hoekstra	45.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Mackinac	Stabenow	52.7%
	Hoekstra	44.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Macomb	Stabenow	59.8%
	Hoekstra	37.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Manistee	Stabenow	56.8%
	Hoekstra	39.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Marquette	Stabenow	63.8%
	Hoekstra	33.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Mason	Stabenow	50.9%
	Hoekstra	46.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Mecosta	Stabenow	50.6%
	Hoekstra	45.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Menominee	Stabenow	53.9%
	Hoekstra	42.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Midland	Stabenow	48.1%
	Hoekstra	48.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Missaukee	Stabenow	39.6%
	Hoekstra	57.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Monroe	Stabenow	56.6%
	Hoekstra	40.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Montcalm	Stabenow	51.0%
	Hoekstra	45.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Montmorency	Stabenow	50.3%
	Hoekstra	45.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Muskegon	Stabenow	60.4%
	Hoekstra	36.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Newaygo	Stabenow	45.2%
	Hoekstra	51.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Oakland	Stabenow	57.5%
	Hoekstra	39.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Oceana	Stabenow	48.2%
	Hoekstra	48.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Ogemaw	Stabenow	58.0%
	Hoekstra	38.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Ontonagon	Stabenow	56.6%
	Hoekstra	40.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Osceola	Stabenow	47.2%
	Hoekstra	49.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Oscoda	Stabenow	48.7%
	Hoekstra	46.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Otsego	Stabenow	46.3%
	Hoekstra	50.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Ottawa	Stabenow	33.4%
	Hoekstra	63.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Presque Isle	Stabenow	54.5%
	Hoekstra	42.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Roscommon	Stabenow	57.3%
	Hoekstra	39.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Saginaw	Stabenow	62.2%
	Hoekstra	35.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

St. Clair	Stabenow	56.5%
	Hoekstra	39.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

St. Joseph	Stabenow	47.0%
	Hoekstra	49.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Sanilac	Stabenow	53.2%
	Hoekstra	43.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Schoolcraft	Stabenow	55.8%
	Hoekstra	41.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Shiawassee	Stabenow	57.5%
	Hoekstra	38.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Tuscola	Stabenow	54.4%
	Hoekstra	41.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Van Buren	Stabenow	53.1%
	Hoekstra	43.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Washtenaw	Stabenow	69.2%
	Hoekstra	27.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Wayne	Stabenow	75.7%
	Hoekstra	21.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Wexford	Stabenow	47.9%
	Hoekstra	47.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

National DataGraph for 2012 - Michigan Results for 2012

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved