2014 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - Oklahoma
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AdairSilverstein25.6%
 
Inhofe71.1%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.1%
 


AlfalfaSilverstein11.7%
 
Inhofe84.7%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.5%
 


AtokaSilverstein26.3%
 
Inhofe70.3%
 
Farr1.5%
 
Other1.9%
 


BeaverSilverstein8.4%
 
Inhofe86.6%
 
Farr1.4%
 
Other3.6%
 


BeckhamSilverstein17.3%
 
Inhofe79.7%
 
Farr0.9%
 
Other2.1%
 


BlaineSilverstein16.3%
 
Inhofe80.1%
 
Farr1.6%
 
Other2.0%
 


BryanSilverstein26.5%
 
Inhofe70.1%
 
Farr1.3%
 
Other2.1%
 


CaddoSilverstein27.8%
 
Inhofe69.4%
 
Farr0.8%
 
Other2.0%
 


CanadianSilverstein18.9%
 
Inhofe77.7%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.1%
 


CarterSilverstein23.3%
 
Inhofe73.0%
 
Farr1.6%
 
Other2.1%
 


CherokeeSilverstein38.5%
 
Inhofe58.0%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.2%
 


ChoctawSilverstein26.3%
 
Inhofe70.4%
 
Farr1.5%
 
Other1.8%
 


CimarronSilverstein5.6%
 
Inhofe90.6%
 
Farr0.3%
 
Other3.5%
 


ClevelandSilverstein33.1%
 
Inhofe63.1%
 
Farr1.6%
 
Other2.2%
 


CoalSilverstein30.0%
 
Inhofe65.0%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other3.8%
 


ComancheSilverstein29.8%
 
Inhofe66.2%
 
Farr1.7%
 
Other2.4%
 


CottonSilverstein21.7%
 
Inhofe75.4%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other1.8%
 


CraigSilverstein29.3%
 
Inhofe67.0%
 
Farr1.1%
 
Other2.6%
 


CreekSilverstein23.9%
 
Inhofe73.1%
 
Farr1.1%
 
Other2.0%
 


CusterSilverstein17.2%
 
Inhofe79.8%
 
Farr1.3%
 
Other1.7%
 


DelawareSilverstein24.6%
 
Inhofe72.1%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.1%
 


DeweySilverstein12.6%
 
Inhofe84.4%
 
Farr0.7%
 
Other2.4%
 


EllisSilverstein9.4%
 
Inhofe87.6%
 
Farr0.8%
 
Other2.2%
 


GarfieldSilverstein18.2%
 
Inhofe78.0%
 
Farr1.1%
 
Other2.7%
 


GarvinSilverstein22.9%
 
Inhofe74.0%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other1.9%
 


GradySilverstein21.3%
 
Inhofe75.4%
 
Farr1.1%
 
Other2.2%
 


GrantSilverstein14.3%
 
Inhofe82.2%
 
Farr1.5%
 
Other2.0%
 


GreerSilverstein23.1%
 
Inhofe73.2%
 
Farr0.9%
 
Other2.8%
 


HarmonSilverstein18.8%
 
Inhofe79.1%
 
Farr0.6%
 
Other1.5%
 


HarperSilverstein9.1%
 
Inhofe87.1%
 
Farr1.3%
 
Other2.5%
 


HaskellSilverstein29.2%
 
Inhofe68.0%
 
Farr0.7%
 
Other2.1%
 


HughesSilverstein27.3%
 
Inhofe68.6%
 
Farr1.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


JacksonSilverstein15.2%
 
Inhofe82.3%
 
Farr1.1%
 
Other1.3%
 


JeffersonSilverstein23.1%
 
Inhofe72.1%
 
Farr2.2%
 
Other2.5%
 


JohnstonSilverstein26.1%
 
Inhofe69.5%
 
Farr1.5%
 
Other2.9%
 


KaySilverstein22.0%
 
Inhofe74.2%
 
Farr1.4%
 
Other2.4%
 


KingfisherSilverstein10.6%
 
Inhofe87.1%
 
Farr0.8%
 
Other1.5%
 


KiowaSilverstein22.0%
 
Inhofe75.8%
 
Farr0.7%
 
Other1.5%
 


LatimerSilverstein33.1%
 
Inhofe63.5%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.2%
 


Le FloreSilverstein28.3%
 
Inhofe66.8%
 
Farr2.3%
 
Other2.6%
 


LincolnSilverstein20.4%
 
Inhofe76.2%
 
Farr1.1%
 
Other2.3%
 


LoganSilverstein21.2%
 
Inhofe75.4%
 
Farr1.3%
 
Other2.1%
 


LoveSilverstein24.3%
 
Inhofe71.8%
 
Farr1.5%
 
Other2.3%
 


McClainSilverstein19.2%
 
Inhofe77.4%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.2%
 


McCurtainSilverstein24.3%
 
Inhofe71.2%
 
Farr1.4%
 
Other3.1%
 


McIntoshSilverstein33.6%
 
Inhofe63.3%
 
Farr1.3%
 
Other1.8%
 


MajorSilverstein9.2%
 
Inhofe81.8%
 
Farr0.5%
 
Other8.4%
 


MarshallSilverstein22.3%
 
Inhofe74.2%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.4%
 


MayesSilverstein28.9%
 
Inhofe67.1%
 
Farr0.9%
 
Other3.1%
 


MurraySilverstein24.5%
 
Inhofe72.0%
 
Farr1.4%
 
Other2.2%
 


MuskogeeSilverstein36.1%
 
Inhofe60.3%
 
Farr1.5%
 
Other2.1%
 


NobleSilverstein17.8%
 
Inhofe79.7%
 
Farr0.8%
 
Other1.8%
 


NowataSilverstein23.8%
 
Inhofe72.6%
 
Farr0.9%
 
Other2.7%
 


OkfuskeeSilverstein30.5%
 
Inhofe66.4%
 
Farr1.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


OklahomaSilverstein36.1%
 
Inhofe60.5%
 
Farr1.4%
 
Other2.1%
 


OkmulgeeSilverstein36.0%
 
Inhofe61.0%
 
Farr1.1%
 
Other1.9%
 


OsageSilverstein33.5%
 
Inhofe63.1%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.2%
 


OttawaSilverstein29.7%
 
Inhofe65.6%
 
Farr1.8%
 
Other3.0%
 


PawneeSilverstein25.6%
 
Inhofe71.0%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.2%
 


PayneSilverstein31.8%
 
Inhofe64.5%
 
Farr1.6%
 
Other2.1%
 


PittsburgSilverstein27.7%
 
Inhofe69.3%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other1.8%
 


PontotocSilverstein26.1%
 
Inhofe70.4%
 
Farr1.3%
 
Other2.2%
 


PottawatomieSilverstein23.5%
 
Inhofe72.7%
 
Farr1.1%
 
Other2.7%
 


PushmatahaSilverstein25.2%
 
Inhofe71.1%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other2.5%
 


Roger MillsSilverstein12.2%
 
Inhofe85.2%
 
Farr0.6%
 
Other2.1%
 


RogersSilverstein22.3%
 
Inhofe73.9%
 
Farr1.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


SeminoleSilverstein26.7%
 
Inhofe70.3%
 
Farr0.9%
 
Other2.2%
 


SequoyahSilverstein31.2%
 
Inhofe64.2%
 
Farr1.6%
 
Other3.1%
 


StephensSilverstein20.1%
 
Inhofe76.1%
 
Farr1.4%
 
Other2.5%
 


TexasSilverstein10.1%
 
Inhofe86.0%
 
Farr1.7%
 
Other2.3%
 


TillmanSilverstein21.8%
 
Inhofe75.5%
 
Farr1.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


TulsaSilverstein32.7%
 
Inhofe64.4%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other1.7%
 


WagonerSilverstein24.2%
 
Inhofe72.7%
 
Farr1.2%
 
Other1.9%
 


WashingtonSilverstein22.2%
 
Inhofe74.3%
 
Farr1.3%
 
Other2.2%
 


WashitaSilverstein15.5%
 
Inhofe82.1%
 
Farr0.9%
 
Other1.4%
 


WoodsSilverstein16.4%
 
Inhofe80.4%
 
Farr0.8%
 
Other2.4%
 


WoodwardSilverstein12.2%
 
Inhofe85.1%
 
Farr1.1%
 
Other1.5%
 



National DataGraph for 2014 - Oklahoma Results for 2014

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved