Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Anderson	Brown	17.9%
	Haslam	75.3%
	Hooker	2.2%
	Other	4.7%

Bedford	Brown	16.5%
	Haslam	76.0%
	Hooker	2.8%
	Other	4.7%

Benton	Brown	26.6%
	Haslam	64.7%
	Hooker	2.1%
	Other	6.6%

Bledsoe	Brown	24.1%
	Haslam	69.4%
	Hooker	2.0%
	Other	4.5%

Blount	Brown	14.1%
	Haslam	79.7%
	Hooker	1.6%
	Other	4.6%

Bradley	Brown	12.6%
	Haslam	83.2%
	Hooker	1.0%
	Other	3.2%

Campbell	Brown	17.8%
	Haslam	77.4%
	Hooker	2.1%
	Other	2.7%

Cannon	Brown	19.7%
	Haslam	71.4%
	Hooker	3.5%
	Other	5.4%

Carroll	Brown	23.1%
	Haslam	69.5%
	Hooker	1.9%
	Other	5.5%

Carter	Brown	14.2%
	Haslam	77.7%
	Hooker	1.7%
	Other	6.4%

Cheatham	Brown	18.0%
	Haslam	72.6%
	Hooker	3.9%
	Other	5.5%

Chester	Brown	15.1%
	Haslam	78.6%
	Hooker	1.3%
	Other	5.1%

Claiborne	Brown	18.0%
	Haslam	76.2%
	Hooker	2.3%
	Other	3.5%

Clay	Brown	26.2%
	Haslam	66.6%
	Hooker	3.0%
	Other	4.2%

Cocke	Brown	14.4%
	Haslam	78.3%
	Hooker	2.6%
	Other	4.7%

Coffee	Brown	18.4%
	Haslam	73.1%
	Hooker	3.3%
	Other	5.2%

Crockett	Brown	19.0%
	Haslam	75.8%
	Hooker	1.7%
	Other	3.4%

Cumberland	Brown	15.5%
	Haslam	79.0%
	Hooker	1.3%
	Other	4.2%

Davidson	Brown	35.4%
	Haslam	53.5%
	Hooker	5.3%
	Other	5.7%

Decatur	Brown	22.3%
	Haslam	71.3%
	Hooker	2.7%
	Other	3.7%

DeKalb	Brown	23.4%
	Haslam	67.9%
	Hooker	3.3%
	Other	5.5%

Dickson	Brown	23.2%
	Haslam	69.1%
	Hooker	3.3%
	Other	4.4%

Dyer	Brown	15.8%
	Haslam	77.8%
	Hooker	1.7%
	Other	4.7%

Fayette	Brown	18.7%
	Haslam	77.1%
	Hooker	0.8%
	Other	3.3%

Fentress	Brown	19.0%
	Haslam	73.2%
	Hooker	2.4%
	Other	5.4%

Franklin	Brown	21.8%
	Haslam	71.0%
	Hooker	2.6%
	Other	4.7%

Gibson	Brown	20.7%
	Haslam	70.3%
	Hooker	1.6%
	Other	7.4%

Giles	Brown	22.2%
	Haslam	70.9%
	Hooker	2.6%
	Other	4.2%

Grainger	Brown	15.3%
	Haslam	78.9%
	Hooker	2.2%
	Other	3.6%

Greene	Brown	15.9%
	Haslam	76.3%
	Hooker	1.9%
	Other	5.9%

Grundy	Brown	26.9%
	Haslam	64.8%
	Hooker	2.8%
	Other	5.5%

Hamblen	Brown	13.7%
	Haslam	81.0%
	Hooker	2.0%
	Other	3.3%

Hamilton	Brown	24.4%
	Haslam	71.3%
	Hooker	1.1%
	Other	3.2%

Hancock	Brown	18.0%
	Haslam	73.5%
	Hooker	2.9%
	Other	5.5%

Hardeman	Brown	37.0%
	Haslam	59.1%
	Hooker	1.2%
	Other	2.6%

Hardin	Brown	15.1%
	Haslam	80.1%
	Hooker	2.0%
	Other	2.8%

Hawkins	Brown	14.4%
	Haslam	79.8%
	Hooker	1.7%
	Other	4.2%

Haywood	Brown	39.8%
	Haslam	57.5%
	Hooker	0.7%
	Other	2.0%

Henderson	Brown	15.8%
	Haslam	76.9%
	Hooker	1.7%
	Other	5.5%

Henry	Brown	21.1%
	Haslam	72.8%
	Hooker	2.0%
	Other	4.2%

Hickman	Brown	22.8%
	Haslam	69.2%
	Hooker	2.8%
	Other	5.2%

Houston	Brown	35.4%
	Haslam	56.1%
	Hooker	2.5%
	Other	6.0%

Humphreys	Brown	28.8%
	Haslam	60.2%
	Hooker	2.9%
	Other	8.1%

Jackson	Brown	26.8%
	Haslam	63.8%
	Hooker	3.5%
	Other	5.9%

Jefferson	Brown	13.1%
	Haslam	80.7%
	Hooker	2.1%
	Other	4.1%

Johnson	Brown	14.9%
	Haslam	78.3%
	Hooker	1.6%
	Other	5.2%

Knox	Brown	15.7%
	Haslam	77.0%
	Hooker	2.2%
	Other	5.1%

Lake	Brown	35.2%
	Haslam	54.1%
	Hooker	4.4%
	Other	6.4%

Lauderdale	Brown	29.4%
	Haslam	65.0%
	Hooker	2.1%
	Other	3.5%

Lawrence	Brown	19.7%
	Haslam	73.4%
	Hooker	2.4%
	Other	4.5%

Lewis	Brown	20.3%
	Haslam	71.1%
	Hooker	1.8%
	Other	6.8%

Lincoln	Brown	17.3%
	Haslam	75.7%
	Hooker	2.0%
	Other	5.0%

Loudon	Brown	11.2%
	Haslam	83.7%
	Hooker	1.5%
	Other	3.6%

McMinn	Brown	16.1%
	Haslam	79.1%
	Hooker	1.6%
	Other	3.2%

McNairy	Brown	19.3%
	Haslam	75.1%
	Hooker	1.8%
	Other	3.8%

Macon	Brown	15.3%
	Haslam	77.0%
	Hooker	3.0%
	Other	4.7%

Madison	Brown	29.5%
	Haslam	64.6%
	Hooker	1.4%
	Other	4.5%

Marion	Brown	27.2%
	Haslam	68.2%
	Hooker	1.4%
	Other	3.2%

Marshall	Brown	20.6%
	Haslam	72.1%
	Hooker	3.1%
	Other	4.2%

Maury	Brown	22.4%
	Haslam	69.3%
	Hooker	1.8%
	Other	6.5%

Meigs	Brown	19.4%
	Haslam	74.5%
	Hooker	2.4%
	Other	3.7%

Monroe	Brown	18.2%
	Haslam	77.1%
	Hooker	1.5%
	Other	3.2%

Montgomery	Brown	24.3%
	Haslam	69.5%
	Hooker	1.6%
	Other	4.6%

Moore	Brown	19.6%
	Haslam	73.2%
	Hooker	2.6%
	Other	4.7%

Morgan	Brown	26.7%
	Haslam	68.0%
	Hooker	2.4%
	Other	2.9%

Obion	Brown	20.7%
	Haslam	67.0%
	Hooker	1.9%
	Other	10.3%

Overton	Brown	25.8%
	Haslam	65.7%
	Hooker	3.0%
	Other	5.4%

Perry	Brown	23.3%
	Haslam	67.2%
	Hooker	2.3%
	Other	7.3%

Pickett	Brown	20.4%
	Haslam	71.6%
	Hooker	2.3%
	Other	5.7%

Polk	Brown	23.6%
	Haslam	71.3%
	Hooker	1.3%
	Other	3.8%

Putnam	Brown	19.0%
	Haslam	72.7%
	Hooker	2.5%
	Other	5.7%

Rhea	Brown	14.8%
	Haslam	81.0%
	Hooker	1.0%
	Other	3.2%

Roane	Brown	16.2%
	Haslam	76.9%
	Hooker	2.8%
	Other	4.1%

Robertson	Brown	18.1%
	Haslam	73.8%
	Hooker	3.0%
	Other	5.0%

Rutherford	Brown	21.8%
	Haslam	70.1%
	Hooker	2.6%
	Other	5.5%

Scott	Brown	20.4%
	Haslam	75.1%
	Hooker	2.1%
	Other	2.4%

Sequatchie	Brown	17.7%
	Haslam	77.8%
	Hooker	1.2%
	Other	3.3%

Sevier	Brown	11.8%
	Haslam	82.4%
	Hooker	1.6%
	Other	4.2%

Shelby	Brown	37.3%
	Haslam	57.8%
	Hooker	1.5%
	Other	3.4%

Smith	Brown	25.4%
	Haslam	65.9%
	Hooker	4.0%
	Other	4.6%

Stewart	Brown	25.5%
	Haslam	67.0%
	Hooker	2.2%
	Other	5.2%

Sullivan	Brown	13.3%
	Haslam	81.0%
	Hooker	1.1%
	Other	4.6%

Sumner	Brown	16.7%
	Haslam	76.7%
	Hooker	2.5%
	Other	4.1%

Tipton	Brown	17.0%
	Haslam	77.9%
	Hooker	1.2%
	Other	3.9%

Trousdale	Brown	26.6%
	Haslam	65.4%
	Hooker	3.8%
	Other	4.3%

Unicoi	Brown	15.2%
	Haslam	76.3%
	Hooker	2.0%
	Other	6.6%

Union	Brown	17.3%
	Haslam	76.9%
	Hooker	2.4%
	Other	3.4%

Van Buren	Brown	31.9%
	Haslam	59.7%
	Hooker	3.2%
	Other	5.2%

Warren	Brown	21.8%
	Haslam	70.1%
	Hooker	3.9%
	Other	4.1%

Washington	Brown	17.1%
	Haslam	74.9%
	Hooker	1.3%
	Other	6.7%

Wayne	Brown	15.5%
	Haslam	77.7%
	Hooker	2.0%
	Other	4.8%

Weakley	Brown	21.7%
	Haslam	69.0%
	Hooker	2.0%
	Other	7.3%

White	Brown	21.3%
	Haslam	70.7%
	Hooker	2.6%
	Other	5.5%

Williamson	Brown	13.2%
	Haslam	79.7%
	Hooker	2.1%
	Other	5.0%

Wilson	Brown	17.1%
	Haslam	75.9%
	Hooker	3.0%
	Other	4.0%

National DataGraph for 2014 - Tennessee Results for 2014

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved