Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adair	Judge	23.7%
	Grassley	71.8%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.2%

Adams	Judge	22.0%
	Grassley	73.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	4.1%

Allamakee	Judge	30.7%
	Grassley	65.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	3.4%

Appanoose	Judge	28.1%
	Grassley	68.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.0%

Audubon	Judge	25.8%
	Grassley	70.8%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.2%

Benton	Judge	27.8%
	Grassley	68.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.6%

Black Hawk	Judge	42.9%
	Grassley	53.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.5%

Boone	Judge	34.3%
	Grassley	61.1%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.3%

Bremer	Judge	32.5%
	Grassley	64.0%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.3%

Buchanan	Judge	32.6%
	Grassley	62.9%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.2%

Buena Vista	Judge	29.6%
	Grassley	66.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.6%

Butler	Judge	23.9%
	Grassley	72.8%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.1%

Calhoun	Judge	22.5%
	Grassley	74.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.0%

Carroll	Judge	26.2%
	Grassley	70.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.4%

Cass	Judge	22.5%
	Grassley	73.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.9%

Cedar	Judge	30.9%
	Grassley	64.9%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.9%

Cerro Gordo	Judge	36.1%
	Grassley	59.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.7%
	Other	3.9%

Cherokee	Judge	21.5%
	Grassley	75.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	2.8%

Chickasaw	Judge	30.6%
	Grassley	65.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.6%

Clarke	Judge	29.0%
	Grassley	66.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.5%

Clay	Judge	22.4%
	Grassley	73.9%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.5%

Clayton	Judge	30.8%
	Grassley	64.9%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.1%

Clinton	Judge	38.9%
	Grassley	56.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.6%

Crawford	Judge	26.4%
	Grassley	69.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.9%

Dallas	Judge	31.4%
	Grassley	64.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.8%

Davis	Judge	25.3%
	Grassley	71.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	2.8%

Decatur	Judge	28.2%
	Grassley	67.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	3.8%

Delaware	Judge	25.8%
	Grassley	70.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.8%

Des Moines	Judge	40.7%
	Grassley	55.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.7%

Dickinson	Judge	23.7%
	Grassley	73.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	2.9%

Dubuque	Judge	39.8%
	Grassley	56.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.6%

Emmet	Judge	24.9%
	Grassley	70.9%
	Luick-Thrams	0.1%
	Other	4.1%

Fayette	Judge	30.9%
	Grassley	64.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.5%

Floyd	Judge	34.2%
	Grassley	62.0%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.6%

Franklin	Judge	23.7%
	Grassley	71.9%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.1%

Fremont	Judge	21.0%
	Grassley	73.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	5.0%

Greene	Judge	28.3%
	Grassley	67.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.0%

Grundy	Judge	19.9%
	Grassley	76.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.3%

Guthrie	Judge	24.7%
	Grassley	70.0%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	5.0%

Hamilton	Judge	28.5%
	Grassley	67.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.8%

Hancock	Judge	22.8%
	Grassley	72.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.2%

Hardin	Judge	27.0%
	Grassley	69.0%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.8%

Harrison	Judge	24.5%
	Grassley	70.0%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	5.1%

Henry	Judge	27.5%
	Grassley	68.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.0%

Howard	Judge	32.4%
	Grassley	63.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.0%

Humboldt	Judge	19.8%
	Grassley	76.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	3.2%

Ida	Judge	16.5%
	Grassley	80.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.0%

Iowa	Judge	27.7%
	Grassley	68.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.3%

Jackson	Judge	34.3%
	Grassley	62.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.0%

Jasper	Judge	32.7%
	Grassley	62.0%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	5.1%

Jefferson	Judge	43.4%
	Grassley	51.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	4.6%

Johnson	Judge	57.1%
	Grassley	38.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.5%
	Other	3.8%

Jones	Judge	30.4%
	Grassley	65.0%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.4%

Keokuk	Judge	21.3%
	Grassley	75.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.2%

Kossuth	Judge	26.2%
	Grassley	70.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.2%

Lee	Judge	40.3%
	Grassley	53.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	6.3%

Linn	Judge	41.2%
	Grassley	54.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.3%

Louisa	Judge	28.9%
	Grassley	66.9%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.0%

Lucas	Judge	25.0%
	Grassley	71.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.2%

Lyon	Judge	12.2%
	Grassley	85.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	2.5%

Madison	Judge	25.9%
	Grassley	69.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.4%

Mahaska	Judge	22.0%
	Grassley	74.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.3%

Marion	Judge	25.9%
	Grassley	70.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.5%

Marshall	Judge	37.1%
	Grassley	58.8%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.8%

Mills	Judge	23.4%
	Grassley	71.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	4.9%

Mitchell	Judge	28.6%
	Grassley	68.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	2.8%

Monona	Judge	23.2%
	Grassley	73.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.5%

Monroe	Judge	33.4%
	Grassley	64.1%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	2.4%

Montgomery	Judge	21.6%
	Grassley	73.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.4%

Muscatine	Judge	36.5%
	Grassley	58.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.9%

O'Brien	Judge	14.5%
	Grassley	83.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	2.1%

Osceola	Judge	14.5%
	Grassley	82.8%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	2.4%

Page	Judge	21.1%
	Grassley	75.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.5%

Palo Alto	Judge	23.8%
	Grassley	72.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.4%

Plymouth	Judge	17.7%
	Grassley	79.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	2.4%

Pocahontas	Judge	20.5%
	Grassley	75.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.6%

Polk	Judge	43.9%
	Grassley	51.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.0%

Pottawattamie	Judge	31.2%
	Grassley	62.0%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	6.4%

Poweshiek	Judge	38.5%
	Grassley	57.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.5%

Ringgold	Judge	23.0%
	Grassley	74.1%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	2.8%

Sac	Judge	19.8%
	Grassley	77.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	2.7%

Scott	Judge	40.7%
	Grassley	54.8%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.2%

Shelby	Judge	23.1%
	Grassley	73.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.4%

Sioux	Judge	9.5%
	Grassley	88.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.1%
	Other	1.7%

Story	Judge	43.5%
	Grassley	51.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	4.4%

Tama	Judge	31.7%
	Grassley	63.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.1%
	Other	4.7%

Taylor	Judge	20.8%
	Grassley	75.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.4%

Union	Judge	28.1%
	Grassley	67.8%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.8%

Van Buren	Judge	21.6%
	Grassley	74.1%
	Luick-Thrams	0.1%
	Other	4.1%

Wapello	Judge	36.3%
	Grassley	58.8%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.8%

Warren	Judge	32.4%
	Grassley	63.5%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.8%

Washington	Judge	28.4%
	Grassley	67.3%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	4.0%

Wayne	Judge	22.0%
	Grassley	74.9%
	Luick-Thrams	0.1%
	Other	2.9%

Webster	Judge	31.4%
	Grassley	64.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.4%
	Other	3.8%

Winnebago	Judge	27.6%
	Grassley	68.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.8%

Winneshiek	Judge	39.5%
	Grassley	56.6%
	Luick-Thrams	0.3%
	Other	3.5%

Woodbury	Judge	32.3%
	Grassley	63.2%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.3%

Worth	Judge	29.5%
	Grassley	65.7%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	4.6%

Wright	Judge	25.9%
	Grassley	70.4%
	Luick-Thrams	0.2%
	Other	3.5%

National DataGraph for 2016 - Iowa Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved