Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Allegany	Van Hollen	33.5%
	Szeliga	62.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Anne Arundel	Van Hollen	48.3%
	Szeliga	48.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Baltimore	Van Hollen	56.4%
	Szeliga	40.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Calvert	Van Hollen	40.4%
	Szeliga	55.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Caroline	Van Hollen	33.2%
	Szeliga	64.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Carroll	Van Hollen	30.6%
	Szeliga	66.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Cecil	Van Hollen	33.8%
	Szeliga	62.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Charles	Van Hollen	63.7%
	Szeliga	33.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Dorchester	Van Hollen	45.1%
	Szeliga	52.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Frederick	Van Hollen	46.6%
	Szeliga	49.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Garrett	Van Hollen	20.2%
	Szeliga	76.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Harford	Van Hollen	36.2%
	Szeliga	60.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Howard	Van Hollen	61.3%
	Szeliga	35.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Kent	Van Hollen	47.6%
	Szeliga	49.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Montgomery	Van Hollen	75.1%
	Szeliga	21.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Prince George's	Van Hollen	87.7%
	Szeliga	8.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Queen Anne's	Van Hollen	32.4%
	Szeliga	65.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

St. Mary's	Van Hollen	37.3%
	Szeliga	58.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Somerset	Van Hollen	44.3%
	Szeliga	53.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Talbot	Van Hollen	44.2%
	Szeliga	53.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Washington	Van Hollen	36.9%
	Szeliga	59.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Wicomico	Van Hollen	44.0%
	Szeliga	52.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Worcester	Van Hollen	36.6%
	Szeliga	60.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

City

Baltimore	Van Hollen	82.6%
	Szeliga	12.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

National DataGraph for 2016 - Maryland Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved