If Romney is unable to rebound...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 04:41:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  If Romney is unable to rebound...
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If Romney is unable to rebound...  (Read 735 times)
ShadowRocket
cb48026
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,467


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 22, 2012, 03:25:14 PM »

How likely is it that Obama could match or excede his '08 margin of victory in the popular and electoral votes?
Logged
sobo
Rookie
**
Posts: 80


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2012, 03:42:25 PM »

Beating 2008 in EV would be very difficult. MO is winnable, but taking IN again based on the recent polls would be very tough, and Obama really needs both to match or exceed 2008 because of the reapportionment in 2010 unless he can somehow pick off an extra state. Even if he picks up MO and MT, but loses IN, Obama would only be at 360.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2012, 08:48:15 PM »

Ah, both tracking polls have the candidates tied
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,738
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2012, 10:10:07 PM »

Ah, both tracking polls have the candidates tied

They are clear outliers and one doesn't call cell phones.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,641
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2012, 10:16:24 PM »

Romney would have to sink further, and that would be really hard. Even at the level he's going now, he'll beat McCain. Not by much, but he will.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2012, 10:18:49 PM »

Ah, both tracking polls have the candidates tied

They are clear outliers and one doesn't call cell phones.

Two separate tracking polls?  

The odd that both are outside of the MOE is about 400 to 1.  The odds that both are showing the same error is about 2000 to 1.

You must be desperate to make that claim.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,738
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2012, 10:49:19 PM »

Ah, both tracking polls have the candidates tied

They are clear outliers and one doesn't call cell phones.

Two separate tracking polls?  

The odd that both are outside of the MOE is about 400 to 1.  The odds that both are showing the same error is about 2000 to 1.

You must be desperate to make that claim.

What is the probability that all of the state polls, national media polls, and the RAND and Reuters/Ipsos trackers are all off in the same direction and these two are right?  It's vanishingly lower.  As Harry Enten says, if it were named anything other than Gallup we would all be ignoring it right now. 

Furthermore, even if they were right, a challenger needs to do more than tie.  Kerry led most of the summer in 2004.  So did Dewey.  Reagan was into the 50's in Gallup during his convention bump.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2012, 11:41:54 PM »
« Edited: September 23, 2012, 01:04:25 AM by Former President Polnut »

Ah, both tracking polls have the candidates tied.  

They are clear outliers and one doesn't call cell phones.

Two separate tracking polls?  

The odd that both are outside of the MOE is about 400 to 1.  The odds that both are showing the same error is about 2000 to 1.

You must be desperate to make that claim.

My question is, forgetting the "rules", how often do the standard polls deviate from the trackers... I don't recall 2004/8 having such contrary finding.  

EDIT: I did some quick reading... at this time in 2008 all polls seemed to be lining up relatively closely... even the trackers.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.225 seconds with 10 queries.