Should there have ever been any troops in Vietnam? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 02:10:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should there have ever been any troops in Vietnam? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Should there have ever been any troops in Vietnam?  (Read 9550 times)
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

« on: May 27, 2004, 07:28:00 PM »

Actually, the main reason the US got involved in Vietnam initially was to help prop up a French government.  Again, it's the damn French at the heart of the problem.
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2004, 04:45:43 PM »

if draftees aren't unwilling soldiers, what are they? What was Kerry then?

The Khmer Rouge got support to come to power through the expansion of the war into Cambodia.

and I agree with the concept of Marxism but not all ideals, and I certainly don't support human rights violations?

You are aware that the philosophy of Marxism itself is a human rights violation?  Taking away people's property and telling them that they can't act in their own interest but only in the interest of the "collective" is a human rights violation.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.