PPP: Christie victorious against ALL Democrats tested (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 10:57:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  PPP: Christie victorious against ALL Democrats tested (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP: Christie victorious against ALL Democrats tested  (Read 4152 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: December 18, 2013, 06:14:28 PM »

Look at those Hillary favorability ratings crumble.

BUT DON'T WORRY! She has a landslide victory wrapped up for her. Some people on the Internets said so.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2013, 08:18:53 AM »

Remember when America's Mayor was crushing Hillary and the other Democrats in 2007?
Fun Times.


Oh, now you're saying that. Ok. Never heard that snark when she was cruising before.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2013, 10:48:28 PM »

Remember when America's Mayor was crushing Hillary and the other Democrats in 2007?
Fun Times.


Oh, now you're saying that. Ok. Never heard that snark when she was cruising before.

Maybe because it didn't make any sense when Clinton was leading, Phil.

It didn't make sense for what reason? Because it's impossible that Hillary could overpoll even though that's exactly what we're seeing to be true?

Or are you playing an idiotic semantics game with me? Roll Eyes I wasn't asking px to point out Hillary under polling in 2007 while she polled well early this year in order to make a point against Hillary. I'm saying he and others should realize that polls this far out, regardless of who is leading, shouldn't be taken so seriously and we shouldn't be crowning anyone as a landslide winner in 2016. Therefore, make a snarky comment about 2007 polling as a jab at the polling.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2013, 04:05:02 PM »

Therefore, make a snarky comment about 2007 polling as a jab at the polling.

Um, no.

I do admire how you make zero attempt to shed your uber hack ways. At least you're honest in your idiocy.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2013, 08:04:45 PM »

Remember when America's Mayor was crushing Hillary and the other Democrats in 2007?
Fun Times.


Oh, now you're saying that. Ok. Never heard that snark when she was cruising before.

Maybe because it didn't make any sense when Clinton was leading, Phil.

It didn't make sense for what reason? Because it's impossible that Hillary could overpoll even though that's exactly what we're seeing to be true?

Or are you playing an idiotic semantics game with me? Roll Eyes I wasn't asking px to point out Hillary under polling in 2007 while she polled well early this year in order to make a point against Hillary. I'm saying he and others should realize that polls this far out, regardless of who is leading, shouldn't be taken so seriously and we shouldn't be crowning anyone as a landslide winner in 2016. Therefore, make a snarky comment about 2007 polling as a jab at the polling.

Keep calm, bro.

Don't worry, it's one of Phil's usual temper tantrums. It's almost Pavlovian.

Trust me: I'm perfectly calm when exposing your idiotic hackery and trolling.

And notice how Julio, who also likes to troll, didn't even bother to defend you. Early polling was fine when your candidates were romping to victory but now they're so bad because Hillary trailed in those polls in 2007. You don't even try to make sense, dude.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 9.687 seconds with 15 queries.