Let the great boundary rejig commence
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 06:30:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Let the great boundary rejig commence
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 41
Author Topic: Let the great boundary rejig commence  (Read 187137 times)
Chancellor of the Duchy of Little Lever and Darcy Lever
andrewteale
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 653
Romania


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 16, 2010, 02:11:16 AM »
« edited: June 16, 2010, 02:13:45 AM by Chancellor of the Duchy of Smithills »

Welsh Electoral Reform Society Recommendations for Wales
(published June 9th 2010)

[snip]
Could I ask someone more skilled than me to table that please and could I also ask for a named current ward map of Wales so I can show which wards go into which seats? (please e-mail me direct with map)

Complete with Welsh translations (corrections welcome) Smiley

Name of constituency Con Lab Lib Dem Plaid UKIP Green BNP Ind Others Totals Electorate Turnout Winner
Y Barri a Phenarth - Barry and Penarth 18,106 16,387 8,112 2,433 1,419 485 0 186 306 47,434 73,652 64.40% Con
Blaenau Gwent a Thredegar - Blaenau Gwent and Tredegar 2,781 16,612 4,198 1,981 623 0 1,227 696 4,675 32,795 78,027 42.03% Lab
Siroedd Frycheiniog a Threfaldwyn - Breconshire and Montgomeryshire 14,085 3,304 15,520 1,839 994 181 0 152 409 36,485 73,630 49.55% Lib Dem
Pen-y-Bont ar Ogwr - Bridgend 10,213 15,024 7,870 2,514 796 0 1,072 0 0 37,489 75,991 49.33% Lab
Caerffili - Caerphilly 6,038 16,700 5,587 4,996 893 0 1,450 985 14 36,662 78,773 46.54% Lab
Canol Caerdydd - Cardiff Central 10,637 13,184 12,753 1,437 912 532 0 191 341 39,988 74,574 53.62% Lab
Gogledd Ddwyrain Caerdydd - Cardiff North East 13,568 15,702 10,680 1,589 1,043 479 0 236 361 43,658 75,345 57.94% Lab
Gorllewin Caerdydd - Cardiff West 13,851 17,175 8,066 2,335 1,125 607 0 106 165 43,428 74,061 58.64% Lab
Caerfyrddin - Carmarthen 11,546 11,885 5,156 9,011 1,173 13 0 134 16 38,934 75,798 51.37% Lab
Ceredigion a Rhaeadr - Ceredigion and Rhayader 7,325 3,406 16,990 8,634 980 528 0 34 66 37,963 74,042 51.27% Lib Dem
Conwy ac Abergele - Conwy and Abergele 13,623 8,667 5,765 5,561 759 0 18 54 194 34,642 74,374 46.58% Con
Dinbych, Llangollen a Bro Conwy - Denbigh, Llangollen and the Vale of Conwy 12,256 12,428 5,762 3,543 764 0 711 21 80 35,564 74,357 47.83% Lab
Y Fflint a'r Rhyl - Flint and Rhyl 12,629 15,043 4,982 1,978 571 0 834 0 76 36,114 73,720 48.99% Lab
Gwynedd a Machynlleth - Gwynedd and Machynlleth 6,367 5,220 4,325 10,863 774 0 0 788 31 28,369 75,318 37.67% Plaid
Llanelli 7,203 14,349 4,590 10,804 1,063 0 118 0 0 38,127 75,776 50.32% Lab
Merthyr Tudful ac Ystrad Mynach - Merthyr Tydifl and Ystrad Mynach 4,034 15,421 8,002 3,495 891 0 1,338 1,303 111 34,596 78,860 43.87% Lab
Yr Wyddgrug a Shotton - Mold and Shotton 12,868 15,638 6,949 1,617 928 0 1,247 0 0 39,247 75,949 51.68% Lab
Trefaldwyn - Monmouth 18,945 12,211 9,526 1,140 1,017 445 283 0 30 43,598 78,292 55.69% Con
Castell-nedd ac Aberafan - Neath and Aberavon 4,681 16,768 5,183 3,531 615 0 1,284 556 338 32,955 74,811 44.05% Lab
Casnewydd - Newport 10,524 14,672 8,710 935 924 238 1,176 0 58 37,237 75,491 49.33% Lab
Penfro - Pembroke 16,827 12,691 5,414 3,883 1,001 0 0 145 0 39,961 75,339 53.04% Con
Pontypridd ac Aberdâr - Pontypridd and Aberdare 3,845 15,315 6,302 5,011 1,037 110 0 135 250 32,004 76,594 41.78% Lab
Rhondda ac Ogwr - Rhondda and Ogmore 3,300 17,213 4,727 4,712 564 41 313 1,648 94 32,612 75,838 43.00% Lab
Dwyrain Abertawe a Bro Nedd - Swansea East and the Vale of Neath 5,861 15,564 6,960 4,863 806 120 1,286 81 96 35,637 77,901 45.75% Lab
Gogledd Abertawe a Llwchwr - Swansea North and Loughor 8,123 15,936 7,478 2,280 758 221 1,345 52 25 36,217 74,988 48.30% Lab
Gorllewin Abertawe a Gŵyr - Swansea West and Gower 9,345 13,539 10,561 1,870 695 272 927 252 120 37,581 77,775 48.32% Lab
Tor-faen - Torfaen 9,213 16,527 6,474 1,826 922 449 1,492 1,594 0 38,497 78,434 49.08% Lab
Bro Elai - Vale of Ely 11,178 15,772 8,758 2,776 1,234 479 84 0 374 40,657 73,196 55.55% Lab
Wrecsam - Wrexham 9,003 12,505 7,744 2,322 787 0 1,124 0 0 33,486 74,020 45.24% Lab
Ynys Môn a Bangor - Anglesey and Bangor 7,223 10,322 3,105 8,805 1,035 0 0 1,526 123 32,140 74,167 43.33% Lab

I can't help but think that they may have to revise this 30-seat scheme.  The electorate figures I have for 2009 only give Wales 29 seats.
Logged
Chancellor of the Duchy of Little Lever and Darcy Lever
andrewteale
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 653
Romania


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 20, 2010, 05:56:35 AM »

Update: The Welsh ERS have now published all the details, including maps, at http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/downloads/reduce_and_equalise_english_web.pdf.

I'm currently working on a scheme for a 62-seat Cheshire and Lancashire which fits the new requirements.  Anyone interested?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 20, 2010, 06:46:57 AM »

Ugh, that Powys East seat is ugly. Though I like the Empty Parts of Northeast Wales seat, somehow.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,768
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 21, 2010, 03:27:58 PM »

Let's have a look map by map...

Gwent & Mid Glamorgan: overall impression... urgh, but I've seen worse. Some of the constituencies make a degree of sense (putting all of Nye's old seat in one constituency is something I approve of, of course) but some are very odd. Their Caerphilly would not survive the hearings process. Also, stupid names... they don't seem to be aware that Tredegar is actually in Blaenau Gwent already.

South Glamorgan: overall impression... ghastly. Words don't exist to describe the utter stupidity of 'Vale of Ely'. The overall map like a desperate attempt to keep a LibDem seat in Cardiff with less seats to play with and I don't have any nicer words for it than that.

West Glamorgan: overall impression... these people should never be allowed to have anything to do with drawing electoral boundaries ever. A clear attempt to draw a non-Labour constituency in the Swansea area. There are not words. Vile. And they don't seem to know what the Gower actually is. Idiots.

Dyfed: this is just insane. I know Mid Wales quite well and I think you'll find that transport links make severl constituencies there impossible. I also don't know what the hell they think they're doing with Llanelli.

Gwynedd: surprisingly reasonable, though I don't think there's any way that Gwynedd & Machynlleth would survive hearings.

Clwyd: again, better than other areas though I don't like it. I would have to question whether the interests of the people of Chirk have much to do with those of the people of Llanrwst, though will admit that interior NE Wales is a problem.

Powys: DIAF
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,577
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 22, 2010, 02:49:05 PM »

Let's have a look map by map...

Gwent & Mid Glamorgan: overall impression... urgh, but I've seen worse. Some of the constituencies make a degree of sense (putting all of Nye's old seat in one constituency is something I approve of, of course) but some are very odd. Their Caerphilly would not survive the hearings process. Also, stupid names... they don't seem to be aware that Tredegar is actually in Blaenau Gwent already.

South Glamorgan: overall impression... ghastly. Words don't exist to describe the utter stupidity of 'Vale of Ely'. The overall map like a desperate attempt to keep a LibDem seat in Cardiff with less seats to play with and I don't have any nicer words for it than that.

West Glamorgan: overall impression... these people should never be allowed to have anything to do with drawing electoral boundaries ever. A clear attempt to draw a non-Labour constituency in the Swansea area. There are not words. Vile. And they don't seem to know what the Gower actually is. Idiots.

Dyfed: this is just insane. I know Mid Wales quite well and I think you'll find that transport links make severl constituencies there impossible. I also don't know what the hell they think they're doing with Llanelli.

Gwynedd: surprisingly reasonable, though I don't think there's any way that Gwynedd & Machynlleth would survive hearings.

Clwyd: again, better than other areas though I don't like it. I would have to question whether the interests of the people of Chirk have much to do with those of the people of Llanrwst, though will admit that interior NE Wales is a problem.

Powys: DIAF

I imagine that if the proposal really is a rigid 3.5% tolerance either side of the quota then you'll have a lot of similar concerns about a lot of the proposals, and not just in the obvious places like the Isle of Wight and the Highlands and Islands.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,768
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 22, 2010, 02:52:10 PM »

That's true. But some of the worst proposals are easily avoidable,
Logged
Chancellor of the Duchy of Little Lever and Darcy Lever
andrewteale
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 653
Romania


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 24, 2010, 05:34:17 AM »

OK, it's time to go public.  Here's my plan for the North West:



Click on the map for all the details.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,768
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 24, 2010, 05:50:43 AM »

Interesting solution to the Manchester problem.
Logged
Harry Hayfield
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,981
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: June 24, 2010, 03:49:18 PM »

OK, it's time to go public.  Here's my plan for the North West:



Click on the map for all the details.


Could you list / send me a "how similar each seat is to the last one" tally and I'd be able to create a set of notionals for those suggestions. By that I mean, Wirral : 100% Wirral West + 7% Wirral South
Logged
Chancellor of the Duchy of Little Lever and Darcy Lever
andrewteale
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 653
Romania


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: June 24, 2010, 05:25:52 PM »

Could you list / send me a "how similar each seat is to the last one" tally and I'd be able to create a set of notionals for those suggestions. By that I mean, Wirral : 100% Wirral West + 7% Wirral South

Harry, you have a PM.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: June 25, 2010, 03:17:59 AM »

Hooray for Tory gerrymandering!
Logged
Harry Hayfield
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,981
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: June 25, 2010, 03:01:59 PM »

OK, it's time to go public.  Here's my plan for the North West:



Click on the map for all the details.

Notional North Western Summary
(Source: Andrew's allocations, Election 2010 Results from the Guardian)
Votes Cast
Labour 1,208,658 (40.25%)
Conservatives 933,978 (31.11%)
Liberal Democrats 634,547 (21.43%)
United Kingdom Independence Party 97,991 (3.26%)
British National Party 64,125 (2.14%)
Independents 32,975 (1.10%)
Green Party 15,486 (0.52%)
Other Parties 5,787 (0.19%)

Party Wins
Accrington and Blackburn North
Altrincham and Sale West
Ashton under Lyne and Stalybridge
Birkenhead
Blackburn and Darwen

Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Blackpool South
Bolton North and Turton
Bolton South
Bootle and Kirkdale
Burnley and Nelson

Bury North
Bury South and Crumpsall
Cheadle
Chorley
City of Chester
Colne and Clitheroe
Congleton
Crewe and Nantwich

Crosby and West Lancashire
Eccles and Worsley

Eddisbury
Ellesmere Port
Fylde
Garston and Halewood
Halton

Hazel Grove
Heywood and Middleton
Hyde
Knowsley

Lancaster and Morecambe
Leigh
Liverpool, Riverside
Liverpool, Walton
Liverpool, West Derby

Lunesdale and Wyre
Macclesfield

Makerfield
Manchester Central and Moston
Manchester, Didsbury and Wythenshawe
Manchester, Gorton and Hulme
Manchester, Withington and Levenshulme
Oldham East and Saddleworth
Oldham West and Royton
Ormskirk, Maghull and Skelmersdale
Preston
Rochdale

Rossendale
Salford
South Ribble
Southport
St. Helens North
St. Helens South and Whiston
Stockport
Stretford, Urmston and Sale East

Tatton
Wallasey
Warrington North

Warrington South
Westhoughton
Wigan

Wirral
Logged
Chancellor of the Duchy of Little Lever and Darcy Lever
andrewteale
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 653
Romania


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: June 25, 2010, 06:02:27 PM »

Thanks Harry.

Pretty much as I was expecting except for Lancaster and Morecambe.  The two predecessor seats (Lancaster & Fleetwood and Morecambe & Lunesdale) both have Tory majorities of less than 1000, and the best Tory areas of both seats are in the new Lunesdale and Wyre.  I would have expected Lancaster & Morecambe to be safeish Labour.

I imagine that Bolton North & Turton and Bury North would have been very close.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,768
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: June 25, 2010, 06:04:23 PM »

I think he's using the method that assumes that all parts of a given constituency vote the same way; which will obviously get a situation like Lancaster and Morecambe wrong.
Logged
Harry Hayfield
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,981
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: June 25, 2010, 06:24:56 PM »

Pretty much as I was expecting except for Lancaster and Morecambe.  The two predecessor seats (Lancaster & Fleetwood and Morecambe & Lunesdale) both have Tory majorities of less than 1000, and the best Tory areas of both seats are in the new Lunesdale and Wyre.  I would have expected Lancaster & Morecambe to be safeish Labour. I imagine that Bolton North & Turton and Bury North would have been very close.

Lancaster and Morecambe
BNP 422 Con 19,737 Green 1,274 Ind 96 Lab 18,972 Lib Dem 7,915 UKIP 1,768

Bolton North and Turton
Con 19,323 Green 76 Ind 271 Lab 23,196 Lib Dem 7,196 UKIP 2,162

Bury North
BNP 2,092 Con 20,386 Green 153 Ind 307 Lab 19,500 Lib Dem 9,225 UKIP 1,405
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,577
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: June 26, 2010, 12:13:25 PM »

Those boundaries don't generally seem too bad, although I remain sceptical about the merits of such a strict size criterion.  I can't see anything obviously wrong with the way you've crossed the metropolitan county boundaries, and the boundaries in the north of the area seem neat.

I don't know north Manchester well enough to know whether crossing the Manchester/Bury boundary like that is a good idea.

"Wirral West" seems more descriptive of 62 than just "Wirral".

20 could be "Crosby and Burscough".

17 could be "Pendle and Bowland": I like naming constituencies after hills.  Quite a bit of it is of course really in Yorkshire...
Logged
Chancellor of the Duchy of Little Lever and Darcy Lever
andrewteale
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 653
Romania


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: June 26, 2010, 03:39:33 PM »

Thanks YorkshireLiberal.

The make-up of Bury South and Crumpsall is basically, from north to south:
(a) Redvales ward, which covers from the edge of Bury town centre to Blackford Bridge.  This is the only ward in Bury with a significant Muslim population. (Incidentally the Pakistan fast bowler Asif Masood now lives in this ward and used to run Fishpool post office.)
(b) Unsworth ward, the southern end of Bury county borough.  This is a socially mixed ward including the villages of Hollins and Unsworth together with the Sunny Bank estate.
(c) Besses and Pilkington Park wards, the old Whitefield Urban District.  Besses (which used to be well-known for Besses o' th' Barn brass band) is very working-class while Pilkington Park is filthy rich and has a very large Jewish population.
(d) St Mary's, Holyrood and Sedgley wards, which cover Prestwich where I grew up.  Prestwich as a whole is more middle-class than Manchester, and again very Jewish.  (Incidentally Joel Barnett started his political career on the old Prestwich Urban District Council.)
(e) Crumpsall ward, based around Crumpsall tram stop and including the North Manchester General Hospital and the northern end of Cheetham Hill proper.  As I put in the penpic, a lot of parents in Crumpsall ward used to send their kids over the borough boundary down the tram line to Prestwich high school, because of the dodgy reputation of the local high school (Abraham Moss).  The tram line and the 135 bus up Bury Old Road mean that communications between Crumpsall and Prestwich are very good.  That's my justification for crossing the boundary here.
(f) Higher Blackley ward, which to be honest has nothing whatsoever to do with Bury beyond the fact that a lot of people from Prestwich like to relax/exercise in Heaton Park, which is the western half of the ward geographically.  However, a Manchester seat which contained Blackley but not Crumpsall would look very weird indeed.

The problem with calling 20 "Crosby and Burscough" is that Burscough is really just an overgrown village and nobody outside the general area knows where it is, or even how to pronounce it.  Burscough was never important enough to have its own Urban District, but was part of West Lancashire Rural District (along with Maghull).  If you want to put two towns in the name Formby would be a better bet - it's bigger than Burscough and full of powerful millionaires - but "Crosby and Formby" would imply that the seat only contained the coastal strip.
Logged
Harry Hayfield
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,981
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: June 27, 2010, 08:58:57 AM »

Any more regions in the pipeline?
Logged
Chancellor of the Duchy of Little Lever and Darcy Lever
andrewteale
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 653
Romania


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: June 27, 2010, 11:13:28 AM »

Not from me for a while.  I have another project which is consuming much of my spare time at the moment.
Logged
Chancellor of the Duchy of Little Lever and Darcy Lever
andrewteale
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 653
Romania


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: June 29, 2010, 03:04:40 PM »

Some blogger called Penddu has had a go at 29 seats for Wales: http://syniadau--buildinganindependentwales.blogspot.com/2010/06/wales-29.html#
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,768
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: June 29, 2010, 03:26:20 PM »

Given the source I was half-expecting an amusing attempted gerrymander, but, no, quite reasonable for the most part. Much better than the atrocity produced by a certain organisation supporting electoral reform...

Generally South is better than North (though a closer look at Cardiff would have been helpful and I don't like that split of the Gower). I don't think that adding the Conwy valley to Anglesey/Bangor is a good idea and the Wrexham-area seats are a little on the crazed side. But, yeah. Not so bad overall.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,577
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: July 05, 2010, 04:28:56 PM »

Based on today's announcement and the December 2009 electorate figures, a target size of 600 gives a quota of 75,701, with a target window from 71,916 to 79,486.  (I guess it may be slightly higher if the target is 598 excluding Orkney and Shetland and Na h-Eileanan an Iar.)

Conveniently, this gives Sheffield almost exactly 5 quotas.  Wards would need to be split, though.  (I'm not sure that this is such a bad thing.)

Cornwall and Scilly seem to come out at 5.5 quotas, so it looks like there'll be a "Devonwall" constituency, which could provoke an interesting reaction.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: July 05, 2010, 09:42:41 PM »

http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2740
Reading through some of the guesses from UKPR, I can tell this is gonna end up being a rather funny electoral map. Halton's bad enough, but an actual Wirral-Liverpool seat? It's as wierd as a Wirral-Wales seat would be.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,768
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: July 05, 2010, 09:45:42 PM »

I would have thought the obvious solution wrt the Wirral would be to re-create the 1974-1983 Wirral and Bebington & Ellesmere Port constituencies? The main problem is after all with the suburban seats and not with Burke & Hare or Welsh Island.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: July 06, 2010, 02:48:11 AM »

I would have thought the obvious solution wrt the Wirral would be to re-create the 1974-1983 Wirral and Bebington & Ellesmere Port constituencies? The main problem is after all with the suburban seats and not with Burke & Hare or Welsh Island.
That would be obvious, which means it will not happen.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 41  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.137 seconds with 11 queries.