NBC/WSJ/Marist: NH-Clinton +9 NV-Tied (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 08, 2024, 09:03:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NBC/WSJ/Marist: NH-Clinton +9 NV-Tied (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NBC/WSJ/Marist: NH-Clinton +9 NV-Tied  (Read 3038 times)
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


« on: October 26, 2016, 04:03:47 PM »

Yeah, that NV poll doesn't line up with the early vote.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2016, 04:06:29 PM »

So this confirms pollster don't know what they're doing with Nevada for the most part.

Pretty much.

Same thing happens every presidential election.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2016, 04:39:53 PM »

As we've learned Presidential cycle after cycle, it's just tough to poll Nevada, even for pretty good pollsters like Marist.  It's still basically safe for Clinton.  If you want to call it Likely, fine whatever.

But is it true?
In 2008/12, it was true. But it might be Obama thing rather then D thing. In 2004 rcp average was pretty good.


Do you guys know what polls showed in Nevada, 2000? I googled, but not found only one poll from Sep 29 2000 Sad
http://www.surveyusa.com/ArchivedArticles/NevadaNews.htm

It showed Al Gore +5


Early voting in NV looks like 2012......so no it is not just an Obama thing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.