FT 4-08: The Alaska Land Purchase Act (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 09:45:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  FT 4-08: The Alaska Land Purchase Act (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FT 4-08: The Alaska Land Purchase Act  (Read 764 times)
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


« on: October 05, 2017, 10:10:49 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2017, 10:16:07 PM »

The reason I introduced this legislation is that I do not trust the Federal government to adequately handle public lands in Alaska. Fremont should be able to regulate the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, and decide how it is used, instead of the Federal government.

We also have a decent budgetary surplus, so we should put it to good use as an investment in the future that could help our economy, specifically the energy industry.

 
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2017, 10:34:33 PM »

Assuming this bill were to pass, and the federal government were to agree to sell, how does the sponsor envision these lands would be used (or not used)? In particular, what would change with respect to how these public lands are currently managed under federal authority?

We could permit additional companies to begin drilling on the land, or even create a regional government corporation which will do so. We could transform the land into a Commonwealth Park, being protected for perpetuity.

I simply see the land's ownership by the Commonwealth in place of the federal government as being beneficial in and of itself.

We don't have to decide now on what to do with the land, and instead allow future Commons to decide what will be done.
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2017, 07:59:31 PM »

A possible amendment. Thoughts?

Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2017, 09:30:33 PM »

This is going to sound very Truman-y, but I want to hear from the other members of the House about this.
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2017, 01:42:50 PM »
« Edited: October 17, 2017, 09:52:35 PM by Commiela🌹 »

Seeing an absence of debate, I motion for a final vote. If anyone has reservations, object in the next 24 hours.
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2017, 06:59:29 PM »

Seeing no objections, we will begin voting.

AYE.
Logged
Kamala
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,499
Madagascar


« Reply #7 on: October 23, 2017, 03:34:06 PM »

And if revenue comes from the purchase, where will it be spent?

I don't see how revenue will be generated from this bill, but if any does, it should go into the maintenance of parks owned by the Commonwealth government.


Regardless, this bill passes by a vote 4-0-2 not voting. It moves to the Prime Minister's desk for further action.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.