What is the liberal ethical argument against necrophilia? (Harm vs disgust) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 06:25:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  What is the liberal ethical argument against necrophilia? (Harm vs disgust) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What is the liberal ethical argument against necrophilia? (Harm vs disgust)  (Read 2860 times)
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« on: June 09, 2018, 09:56:40 PM »


2 b) Indeed, according to a pure utilitarian calculus a necrophile committing the act in the privacy of his own home without anyone knowing is making the world a better place by increasing his own happiness while not affecting the happiness of any other person.  


I have mixed feelings on the legality of necrophilia, but this could be analogous for a man to put a camera in a woman's shower if he were sure she (or anyone else) would never find out. That would still be considered a violation of the wishes of the woman. Not saying this is totally analogous because one is alive is the other is dead.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.