FDR best President, Obama 15th, scholars say
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 12:54:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  FDR best President, Obama 15th, scholars say
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: FDR best President, Obama 15th, scholars say  (Read 8812 times)
Saxwsylvania
Van Der Blub
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,534


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: July 02, 2010, 11:18:01 AM »

Since the professorial field is overwhelmingly liberal Democrat, these findings are worthy of an eye roll and nothing more.  Anyone who thinks Bill Clinton was a better President than Ronald Reagan needs their head examined.  Obama in the top 15?  Lol.

Roll Eyes

Or maybe they're more likely to be liberal because they know and understand history, whereas conservatives are, as the old saying goes, just doomed to repeat it?

So only liberals can interpret history correctly?  Hmm, I guess you're right, except when it comes to economics, war, and most social issues.

I think the best judges of presidential performance are the people, not an ivory tower clique of Marxist professors.  If you seriously think that Obama should be ranked #15 (now or ever) you need serious counseling.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: July 02, 2010, 11:51:40 AM »

Since the professorial field is overwhelmingly liberal Democrat, these findings are worthy of an eye roll and nothing more.  Anyone who thinks Bill Clinton was a better President than Ronald Reagan needs their head examined.  Obama in the top 15?  Lol.

Roll Eyes

Or maybe they're more likely to be liberal because they know and understand history, whereas conservatives are, as the old saying goes, just doomed to repeat it?

So only liberals can interpret history correctly?  Hmm, I guess you're right, except when it comes to economics, war, and most social issues.

I think the best judges of presidential performance are the people, not an ivory tower clique of Marxist professors.  If you seriously think that Obama should be ranked #15 (now or ever) you need serious counseling.

Your opinion matters.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: July 02, 2010, 12:00:28 PM »

Since the professorial field is overwhelmingly liberal Democrat, these findings are worthy of an eye roll and nothing more.  Anyone who thinks Bill Clinton was a better President than Ronald Reagan needs their head examined.  Obama in the top 15?  Lol.

Roll Eyes

Or maybe they're more likely to be liberal because they know and understand history, whereas conservatives are, as the old saying goes, just doomed to repeat it?

And Lunar tries to tell me that Liberalism is not inherently arrogant. Thanks badger, I am trully grateful for you help in proving me right. Grin 
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: July 02, 2010, 03:07:01 PM »

Harrison and Garfeild probably shouldn't be ranked at all, given that they had less than six months in office.
Logged
Ameriplan
WilliamSargent
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,199
Faroe Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: July 02, 2010, 10:15:24 PM »

Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: July 02, 2010, 10:57:42 PM »

Obama is 15th now because he's only finished half his term. 2 more years and he'll be at 30th.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: July 02, 2010, 11:08:27 PM »

During his three year tenure his greatest accomplishment was probably the Cuban Missile Crisis, which he handle admirably.

JFK was responsible for causing the Cuban Missile Crisis by placing American missiles in Turkey and provoking the U.S.S.R., thus causing them to place missiles in Cuba in retaliation. Not to mention that JFK shouldn't have screwed up the Bay of Pigs.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: July 02, 2010, 11:17:44 PM »


Anyway, what say you, uh, Atlas people?


Well, if Sienna says it, and Politico reports it, then it must be true.

Okay, actually Sienna College is a fine school.  I know its campus well.  (you there, John?  You prick.) 

On a serious note, any poll that ranks Obama anywhere except TBA has at least one serious fault.
Logged
Ameriplan
WilliamSargent
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,199
Faroe Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: July 02, 2010, 11:19:54 PM »

all i can say is, someone wants government grant money.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: July 02, 2010, 11:38:21 PM »

all i can say is, someone wants government grant money.

who doesn't?  Of course Lonnstrom wants to get in on the dole.

Bear in mind, my comments come from someone who voted for Obama in 2008 and may (or may not) do so again in 2012, so it's not just some GOP dope who wants to take a dump on Obama.  Still, even if you can't find anyone, on the first day, who'll vouch for the benefits of chewing gum, it's easy enough to find "four out of five" who will recommend Trident "to their patients who chew gum."  Keep on knocking on doors and you'll eventually find enough people in some neighborhood who'll buy what you're selling.  I'm not saying that I agree or disagree with their alpha or their omega.  In fact, they called it pretty well.  I'm just advising caution here.  This is just 238 Americans, chosen in some way that was neither random nor unexpected, who are willing to step out on a limb and say that these are the Best Presidents of the United States, and who have sufficient credentials to allow the casual observer to reasonably consider them experts.  Take it all with at least 64.79891 milligrams of salt.

As for ranking any sitting president, you might as well scratch anything I said earlier, since the ranking suddenly has lost all credibility.  At least let the body start to cool before reading the will.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,977


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: July 02, 2010, 11:49:14 PM »


He has an interesting idea, but it is ruined by the fact that he cannot separate it from his own hackery. In fact, the idea itself probably originates from his hackery, which ruins it thoroughly. The worst type is those that act wonky but are actually hacks. It is the height of arrogance. He is another disappointment who only emphasizes the main problem with American punditry today.
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: July 03, 2010, 12:30:07 AM »

So more confirmation that "presidential scholars" are idiots and hacks.

Their criteria for choosing good presidents consist of who killed the most people, impoverished the most families, and destroyed the most freedom.

If I was going by that criteria, FDR, Wilson, Lincoln, and Johnson would be my top 4.

Has any president actually increased freedom?
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: July 03, 2010, 01:16:49 AM »

Has any president actually increased freedom?

Hm, maybe the early few did.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: July 03, 2010, 01:27:26 AM »

The 1920's Republicans probably did.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: July 03, 2010, 11:35:16 AM »

How the hell they can even rate an incumbent, who's less than 2 years in office?
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: July 03, 2010, 12:40:43 PM »

I don't need a scholar to explain to me how Obama ranks when the unemployment rate is 9.5% and only that low because it doesn't include people not looking for work, we're attacked on our own soil even with the Homeland Security Act passed as was in Fort Hood, an oil spill that he mocks, and a pervert as a school czar. I hope others on this forum can see what's in front of their face too.
Logged
Ameriplan
WilliamSargent
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,199
Faroe Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: July 03, 2010, 10:21:54 PM »

How the hell they can even rate an incumbent, who's less than 2 years in office?
Logged
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: July 03, 2010, 11:07:04 PM »

If Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover had been successful, the Republicans would have placed them in the top 5 Presidents in U.S. history.  These guys held the exact same policies as Reagan, except Hoover changed his beleifs when he saw that some of his Republican economic policies were hurting the United States.  My point is that we judge our Presidents by things they had no control over.  Reagan didn't create a good economy by lowering taxes.  That's a myth beleived by people who think lowering taxes has major effects on our economy.   Our best economy was during the 1960s, when taxes were at 70% or higher.  There are other factors that effect our economy like the availability of credit, war and the regulation or deregulation of certain areas of our economy.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: July 04, 2010, 10:40:50 PM »

If Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover had been successful, the Republicans would have placed them in the top 5 Presidents in U.S. history.  These guys held the exact same policies as Reagan, except Hoover changed his beleifs when he saw that some of his Republican economic policies were hurting the United States.  My point is that we judge our Presidents by things they had no control over.  Reagan didn't create a good economy by lowering taxes.  That's a myth beleived by people who think lowering taxes has major effects on our economy.   Our best economy was during the 1960s, when taxes were at 70% or higher.  There are other factors that effect our economy like the availability of credit, war and the regulation or deregulation of certain areas of our economy.

This one, also many people fail to realize that the policies of a president often don't have their full effect until after their term has expired.
Logged
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: July 05, 2010, 12:19:12 AM »
« Edited: July 05, 2010, 12:45:26 AM by TheGreatOne »

Since the professorial field is overwhelmingly liberal Democrat, these findings are worthy of an eye roll and nothing more.  Anyone who thinks Bill Clinton was a better President than Ronald Reagan needs their head examined.  Obama in the top 15?  Lol.
Reagan was a sh**t President.  If he was a Democrat, the Republicans would have cut him down for spending so much during his administration in a peace-time economy.  His intervention in the middle east also caused alot of the major problems that we are dealing with today.  He gave Iraq the chemical weapons that the Bush Administration complained about, and supported Saddam's invasion of Iran and genocide of the kurds.  He also traded weapons to Iran for hostages.  His economic success were caused by the invention of the credit card, which became big in the 1980s.  

My top ten: Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Andrew Jackson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Polk, Wilson, and Madison.


Honorable mention:  Monroe

Overated Presidents: Washington, Reagan, JFK, and Lyndon Johnson
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: July 05, 2010, 12:26:18 AM »

Since the professorial field is overwhelmingly liberal Democrat, these findings are worthy of an eye roll and nothing more.  Anyone who thinks Bill Clinton was a better President than Ronald Reagan needs their head examined.  Obama in the top 15?  Lol.

Roll Eyes

Or maybe they're more likely to be liberal because they know and understand history, whereas conservatives are, as the old saying goes, just doomed to repeat it?

And Lunar tries to tell me that Liberalism is not inherently arrogant. Thanks badger, I am trully grateful for you help in proving me right. Grin  

How did I get dragged into this?

I think it's ridiculous to include a present administration in this poll, although perhaps not, as although modern opinions would be pretty useless for us, they could be useful for historians in a few decades to come back and analyze.  

These ratings, it should be said, are partially based on the scope of the challenges and major hurdles that a president has had to face.  FDR gets ranked high because he's viewed as having successfully tackled both a Depression and a World War.
Logged
sentinel
sirnick
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,733
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: July 05, 2010, 09:56:10 PM »

Where the hell is President Polk?
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: July 05, 2010, 10:31:29 PM »

Where the hell is President Polk?

#12.
Logged
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: July 05, 2010, 10:53:23 PM »

Polk should be in the top 10.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: July 05, 2010, 10:55:03 PM »

Kennedy was terrible. He should be around 30.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 10 queries.