DRA stuff

[Brittain33]

Is it possible doing DRA on Android devices?

Considering what DRA does to a computer, it would probably make your phone catch fire if you tried.

[jimrtex]

Is it possible doing DRA on Android devices?

Considering what DRA does to a computer, it would probably make your phone catch fire if you tried.

And that would likely result in DJT tweeting about barring Atlasians (and the press twittering about how Trump not knowing how to spell Alsatians). The NYT would do a lengthy article about calls in France for rebuilding the Maginot Line.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

PVI:

Blue: D+1.93
Green: D+3.88
Red: D+22.98
Yellow: D+31.18
Magenta: R+2
Cyan: R+5.49
Dark Blue: D+16.94
Dark Red: D+7.2
Dark Green: R+7.32
Gray: R+3.53
Black: D+12.18
White: D+0.82

[Dr. MB]

A majority-minority district in Washington

D+23
White 43%
Black 14%
Hispanic 16%
Asian 21%
Native 1%
Other 5%

[Dr. MB]

I don't think it's possible to get a maj-min district in Oregon at the district level but I managed one that's 60% white.

[Dr. MB]

And finally, Nevada

Blue district – D+7
48% White, 9% Black, 26% Hispanic, 13% Asian, 4% Other

Green district – D+20
29% White, 15% Black, 46% Hispanic, 6.5% Asian, 3% Other

[Kamala]

Here's a map I made for Colorado 2020 , when it's expected to gain one seat.

Denver metro:

CO-01 - R+13, El Paso County
CO-02 - D+2, "Ski Country" district, follows highways from Pueblo to Fort Collins
CO-03 - D+6, Boulder and Weld counties and the city of Loveland in Larimer County
CO-04 - D+2, Broomfield and Jeffco, Denver south of Yale avenue and west of Federal blvd, as well a small bit west of Sheridan blvd
CO-05 - D+10, Adamco, far east Arapahoe county, Elbert County, Denver international airport and Denver west of highway 87,
CO-06 - D+1, Arapahoe County, town of Aurora and Douglas county
CO-07 - D+13, rest of Denver, and Littleton.
CO-08 - R+14, everything else - Grand Junction, rest of rural Colorado.

2 safe R, 3 safe D, 3 swing but lean D.

[Dr. MB]

Majority-minority district in Connecticut
41% White
24% Black
28% Hispanic
4% Asian
3% Other

75% Obama, 24% McCain

[Dr. MB]

Majority-minority district in Massachusetts
37% White
26% Black
24% Hispanic
7% Asian
6% Other

D+30

[Pessimistic Antineutrino]

Threw together an Ohio map



OH-01
Obama 58.0
McCain 40.4
D+2.48

OH-02
Obama 45.4
McCain 52.4
R+12.73

OH-03
Obama 49.1
McCain 49.3
R+6.70

OH-04
Obama 61.0
McCain 37.6
D+8.98

OH-05
Obama 73.8
McCain 25.3
D+22.37

OH-06
Obama 56.6
McCain 42.2
D+1.51

OH-07
Obama 56.6
McCain 41.4
R+0.09

OH-08
Obama 49.2
McCain 48.6
R+11.4

OH-09
Obama 41.7
McCain 56.2
R+16.27

OH-10
Obama 47.1
McCain 51.1
R+6.51

OH-11
Obama 63.5
McCain 35.2
D+15.53

OH-12
Obama 41.7
McCain 56.8
R+10.74

OH-13
Obama 55.0
McCain 45.0
D+5.19

OH-14
Obama 35.3
McCain 63.5
R+17.90

OH-15
Obama 48.8
McCain 49.8
R+4.79

OH-16
Obama 36.8
McCain 61.4
R+20.77

[Dr. MB]

I've somehow managed to create a majority-minority district in Minnesota (barely).

49.9% White
21% Black
12.4% Hispanic
11.8% Asian
1.3% Native
3.7% Other
D+27.28

[Dr. MB]

Majority-minority district in Wisconsin

39% White
37% Black
18% Hispanic
3% Asian
0.5% Native
2.5% Other

D+26

[Lachi]

Dave's Redisticting 2.2 seems to be dead for me, none of my browsers will run it, not even IE or Firefox ESR.

EDIT: Nvm, it takes a LOT of coxing for it to work though, and it still runs like complete sh**t, even on a really good computer.

[Pennsylvania Deplorable]

Updated map

Are they going to get the other states soon?

[Oryxslayer]

Updated map

Are they going to get the other states soon?

I was just checking this today, and then saw your post. Since this map was created, NY, FL, and IL have had data added to then. CA at the time of this maps creation only had 12/16 data for it's useless voting districts data (the version with 200,000 pop tracts that is not used by anyone but the census) and now has 12/16 data for the block groups (the one with 2008 data, and with actual precincts).

It is quite possible we never get the at-large states, or get them all last, since the congressional PVIs are the same in their cases as the well known state PVIs.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

Updated map

Are they going to get the other states soon?

I was just checking this today, and then saw your post. Since this map was created, NY, FL, and IL have had data added to then. CA at the time of this maps creation only had 12/16 data for it's useless voting districts data (the version with 200,000 pop tracts that is not used by anyone but the census) and now has 12/16 data for the block groups (the one with 2008 data, and with actual precincts).

It is quite possible we never get the at-large states, or get them all last, since the congressional PVIs are the same in their cases as the well known state PVIs.

Ugh, I hope all the states get data.  Sometimes, it is fun to mess around with seeing what would happen if states had more seats than they actually did.

[Pennsylvania Deplorable]

Updated map

Are they going to get the other states soon?

I was just checking this today, and then saw your post. Since this map was created, NY, FL, and IL have had data added to then. CA at the time of this maps creation only had 12/16 data for it's useless voting districts data (the version with 200,000 pop tracts that is not used by anyone but the census) and now has 12/16 data for the block groups (the one with 2008 data, and with actual precincts).

It is quite possible we never get the at-large states, or get them all last, since the congressional PVIs are the same in their cases as the well known state PVIs.

Ugh, I hope all the states get data.  Sometimes, it is fun to mess around with seeing what would happen if states had more seats than they actually did.

Exactly what I was doing. I wanted to know if Montana got a second district (which could soon happen), would both be red? I think the western part of the state including Missoula would probably just lean red while the eastern district would be as red as it gets.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

PVI:

Blue: D+17.67
Green: D+1.47
Red: R+7.04
Yellow: R+16.74
Magenta: D+14.8
Cyan: D+3.41
Black: R+5.66
White: R+7.11

fair Wisconsin Districts 4-4.

Only 5 Counties split.

1162 population difference between most and least populated districts.

Red District has absolutely no split Counties.

[AustralianSwingVoter]

Updated map of current 2012/2016 PVI data available in DRA

The only states with more than one Congressional District which still don't have data are; Texas, Louisiana, Michigan and Connecticut

[Dr. MB]

Updated map

Are they going to get the other states soon?

I was just checking this today, and then saw your post. Since this map was created, NY, FL, and IL have had data added to then. CA at the time of this maps creation only had 12/16 data for it's useless voting districts data (the version with 200,000 pop tracts that is not used by anyone but the census) and now has 12/16 data for the block groups (the one with 2008 data, and with actual precincts).

It is quite possible we never get the at-large states, or get them all last, since the congressional PVIs are the same in their cases as the well known state PVIs.

Ugh, I hope all the states get data.  Sometimes, it is fun to mess around with seeing what would happen if states had more seats than they actually did.

Exactly what I was doing. I wanted to know if Montana got a second district (which could soon happen), would both be red? I think the western part of the state including Missoula would probably just lean red while the eastern district would be as red as it gets.

The western one would be Lean R (but I think Quist would've won it). The eastern one would be R+15 or more.

[Oryxslayer]

I was peeking around in the deep South just now due to Jones's victory and what districts could be drawn, and I saw Louisiana had PVI. This sent me to the other states missing data, and I can confirm that CT, LA, and TX now have PVI. This means that Michigan is the last multi-district state without 12/16 PVI data. One would think that this spot would be California's be default, but no - it is Michigan's.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

I was peeking around in the deep South just now due to Jones's victory and what districts could be drawn, and I saw Louisiana had PVI. This sent me to the other states missing data, and I can confirm that CT, LA, and TX now have PVI. This means that Michigan is the last multi-district state without 12/16 PVI data. One would think that this spot would be California's be default, but no - it is Michigan's.

Pennsylvania data is incomplete.

[Oryxslayer]

I was peeking around in the deep South just now due to Jones's victory and what districts could be drawn, and I saw Louisiana had PVI. This sent me to the other states missing data, and I can confirm that CT, LA, and TX now have PVI. This means that Michigan is the last multi-district state without 12/16 PVI data. One would think that this spot would be California's be default, but no - it is Michigan's.

Pennsylvania data is incomplete.

This was mentioned elsewhere but not here - so I should repeat it. PA apparently changed there precincts in some massive way - so the map that DRA automatically selects at the top of the select list is outdated and missing data. You need to click the next one down, or the second map for full 2012/16 data.

You need to select 2010 Voting Districts.

You should not select 2010 Voting Districts (Updated by the state)

[Strudelcutie4427]

A fair fight map with 3 competitive districts in Connecticut

1. D+15
2. D+3
3. D+14
4. D+3
5. R+2

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

An Iowa plan using 2020 population estimates, and minimal County movement.