Least polarizing, least relevant, most boring election? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 08, 2024, 05:33:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Least polarizing, least relevant, most boring election? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Least polarizing, least relevant, most boring election?
#1
1976
 
#2
1988
 
#3
other/both/neither
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Author Topic: Least polarizing, least relevant, most boring election?  (Read 1279 times)
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« on: August 18, 2017, 05:14:53 PM »

I understand the OP's points about 1988, but I think 1988 has some relevance for today:

- Dukakis' views were to the left of GHWB, and his voters were to that left of GHWB's. and states/counties where Dukakis won were to the left of states/counties GHWB won. All of this is more true than for Carter and Ford. The biggest indicators of Carter/Ford states/counties were partisanship rather than ideology.
- Dukakis' states correlate with the states where Obama carried the white vote in 2008/2012.
- The 1988 PVI map matches up pretty well with states that are economically liberal or conservative, at least for the time.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.