Smid's Diplomacy Game Thread #3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 11, 2024, 06:40:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Election and History Games (Moderator: Dereich)
  Smid's Diplomacy Game Thread #3
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15
Author Topic: Smid's Diplomacy Game Thread #3  (Read 58147 times)
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #100 on: November 08, 2009, 06:53:44 AM »

Turkey's A Bul retreats to Rum.

Prior to builds, the map appears thus:



Turkey gains a build, Russia a disband, all other powers remain the same.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,802


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #101 on: November 08, 2009, 07:02:30 AM »

Turkey's A Bul retreats to Rum.

Prior to builds, the map appears thus:



Turkey gains a build, Russia a disband, all other powers remain the same.

I believe Italy has the disband with only 3 centers and 4 units. Russia has 5 centers and 5 units.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #102 on: November 08, 2009, 07:03:38 AM »

I believe muon is right and smid just mistyped.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,348
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #103 on: November 08, 2009, 10:21:05 AM »

That's correct.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,819


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #104 on: November 08, 2009, 04:16:47 PM »

A Belgium Supports F North Sea - Holland (*Void*)
A Holland Supports F North Sea - Belgium (*Void*)

lol
Reminds me of a line from an Edi Birsan video

Erc should've been more explicit in his PMs.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #105 on: November 08, 2009, 05:33:32 PM »

Sorry - it is indeed my error. I looked too quickly at the "Status" Window in Realpolitik and misread the line with the disband.

So Turkey builds an Army in Constantinople and Italy disbands its Army in Bohemia.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #106 on: November 15, 2009, 12:11:43 AM »
« Edited: November 15, 2009, 12:39:24 AM by Smid »

Moves for Spring 1904 were:



France
A Belgium Holds
A Burgundy Supports A Ruhr - Munich
F Gulf of Lyon - Western Mediterranean
F Mid-Atlantic Ocean - North Atlantic Ocean
F Picardy - Brest
A Ruhr - Munich

Russia
F Berlin Holds
A Galicia Supports A Silesia - Warsaw (*Cut*)
A Sevastopol Supports A Rumania (*Ordered to Move*)
A Silesia - Warsaw
A Warsaw - Livonia

Italy
F Adriatic Sea S F Ionian Sea - Apulia (*Cut*)
F Ionian Sea - Apulia
A Tuscany - Rome

Germany
F Helgoland Bight - Holland
A Holland - Ruhr
A Kiel Supports A Holland - Ruhr
A Munich Supports A Holland - Ruhr (*Dislodged*)

Austria-Hungary
A Budapest - Galicia (*Fails*)
F Bulgaria (sc) - Greece (*Disbanded*)
A Serbia - Bulgaria (*Fails*)
F Trieste - Adriatic Sea (*Fails*)
A Ukraine - Sevastopol (*Fails*)
A Venice - Tuscany

Turkey
F Aegean Sea Supports F Greece
A Constantinople Supports A Rumania - Bulgaria
F Greece Supports A Rumania - Bulgaria
A Rumania - Bulgaria
A Smyrna Holds

England
F English Channel Supports F Irish Sea - Mid-Atlantic Ocean
F Irish Sea - Mid-Atlantic Ocean
F North Sea Supports F English Channel
F Sweden Holds
A Wales - London

After moves, the map appears thus:



Retreats are required for the German Army in Munich.
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,802


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #107 on: November 15, 2009, 12:33:54 AM »

Germany
F Helgoland Bight - Holland
A Holland - Ruhr
A Kiel Supports A Holland - Ruhr
A Munich Supports A Holland - Ruhr (*Disbanded*)

After moves, the map appears thus:



Retreats are required for the German Army in Munich.

The map and the retreat are correct, but the orders should show (*Dislodged*) for A mun.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,191
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #108 on: November 15, 2009, 12:39:15 AM »

     Austria's orders perplex me.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #109 on: November 15, 2009, 12:42:39 AM »

Germany
F Helgoland Bight - Holland
A Holland - Ruhr
A Kiel Supports A Holland - Ruhr
A Munich Supports A Holland - Ruhr (*Disbanded*)

After moves, the map appears thus:



Retreats are required for the German Army in Munich.

The map and the retreat are correct, but the orders should show (*Dislodged*) for A mun.

Cheers for spotting that for me!
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,819


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #110 on: November 15, 2009, 02:17:03 PM »

All this time and I just now notice that North Atlantic connects to Yorkshire?

No big deal, though.  Gustaf's fleet can enjoy their brief occupation of the North Country.  Not much good it'll do him.  Smiley
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #111 on: November 15, 2009, 02:21:45 PM »

D'you mean Liverpool?
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #112 on: November 15, 2009, 04:20:07 PM »

My army in Munich retreats to Tyrolia.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,819


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #113 on: November 15, 2009, 05:00:58 PM »


Yes, yes I did.  I had my hellish post-industrial wastelands Oop North mixed up.  So sue me.

It'd be like a Brit mixing up Cleveland and Buffalo.  Does it really matter?

Wink
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #114 on: November 15, 2009, 07:19:38 PM »
« Edited: November 17, 2009, 07:06:29 AM by Smid »

My army in Munich retreats to Tyrolia.


Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #115 on: November 16, 2009, 12:24:11 PM »


Yes, yes I did.  I had my hellish post-industrial wastelands Oop North mixed up.  So sue me.

It'd be like a Brit mixing up Cleveland and Buffalo.

No, no. A group of interrelated areas on the East Coast versus a grubby city on the West Coast? You basically just confused New England with Oakland.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,348
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #116 on: November 16, 2009, 03:34:56 PM »


Yes, yes I did.  I had my hellish post-industrial wastelands Oop North mixed up.  So sue me.

It'd be like a Brit mixing up Cleveland and Buffalo.

No, no. A group of interrelated areas on the East Coast versus a grubby city on the West Coast? You basically just confused New England with Oakland.

But Liverpool has a better football team, by a considerable margin...
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #117 on: November 21, 2009, 11:13:17 PM »

The moves for this week were:



France
A Belgium - Ruhr
F Brest Holds
A Burgundy Supports A Munich
A Munich Supports A Belgium - Ruhr
F North Atlantic Ocean - Liverpool
F Western Mediterranean - Tunis

Russia
F Berlin Holds
A Galicia - Budapest (*Fails*)
A Livonia - Moscow
A Sevastopol Supports A Bulgaria - Rumania
A Warsaw Holds

Italy
F Adriatic Sea Supports F Apulia - Venice
F Apulia - Venice
A Rome Supports F Apulia - Venice

Germany
F Holland NMR
A Kiel NMR
A Ruhr NMR (*Disbanded*)
A Tyrolia NMR

Austria-Hungary
A Budapest Supports A Ukraine - Rumania (*Cut*)
A Serbia - Bulgaria (*Fails*)
F Trieste Supports A Tuscany - Venice
A Tuscany - Venice (*Fails*)
A Ukraine - Rumania (*Fails*)

Turkey
F Aegean Sea Supports A Constantinople - Bulgaria
A Bulgaria - Rumania
A Constantinople - Bulgaria
F Greece Holds
A Smyrna - Constantinople

England
F English Channel Supports A London - Belgium
A London - Belgium
F Mid-Atlantic Ocean - Portugal
F North Sea Convoys A London - Belgium
F Sweden Holds

The map following these moves appears thus:



There are no retreats required.

Builds are:

F Build 1
R Build 0
I Build 0
G Build 0
A Remove 1
T Build 1
E Build 1

And the Supply Centre Count is:

F 7
R 5
I 3
G 3
A 4
T 6
E 6
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #118 on: November 21, 2009, 11:43:34 PM »

why England doesn't move to Norway or one of those seas next to Sev is interesting.  Seems like you'd either hold Sev hostage or just move into Denmark.

England will certainly own Spain by next turn, maybe she just doesn't want to make any unnecessary enemies. 
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #119 on: November 21, 2009, 11:46:09 PM »

hah, I never even realized that NaO connected to Liverpool
Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,802


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #120 on: November 22, 2009, 12:10:53 AM »

why England doesn't move to Norway or one of those seas next to Sev is interesting.  Seems like you'd either hold Sev hostage or just move into Denmark.

England will certainly own Spain by next turn, maybe she just doesn't want to make any unnecessary enemies. 

On the other side of the map I thought the hold on Greece was interesting. With a hold it couldn't contribute to the turn's action. Had it been used to support the move into Bulgaria, it would have freed up the Aegean fleet to get in position for action in the following spring.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #121 on: November 22, 2009, 12:36:29 AM »

why England doesn't move to Norway or one of those seas next to Sev is interesting.  Seems like you'd either hold Sev hostage or just move into Denmark.

England will certainly own Spain by next turn, maybe she just doesn't want to make any unnecessary enemies. 

On the other side of the map I thought the hold on Greece was interesting. With a hold it couldn't contribute to the turn's action. Had it been used to support the move into Bulgaria, it would have freed up the Aegean fleet to get in position for action in the following spring.

When typing the results, I actually went back and checked my PMs to ensure I hadn't mis-entered the orders for that Fleet in Greece because I was so surprised by it.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,819


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #122 on: November 22, 2009, 02:29:43 AM »

hah, I never even realized that NaO connected to Liverpool

I had the same reaction upthread a bit.  I was willing to let Gustaf into NAO because I didn't think he'd get into one of my home centers before the year ended and I could build a new unit in LVP or EDI to defend them.

It's hardly a catastrophe.

why England doesn't move to Norway or one of those seas next to Sev is interesting.  Seems like you'd either hold Sev hostage or just move into Denmark.

England will certainly own Spain by next turn, maybe she just doesn't want to make any unnecessary enemies. 

Well, if I'd known Erc would be MIA, I'd have considered it.  Tongue

Seriously, though, I'm already at war with France.  Why add Russia and Germany on top of that?
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,191
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #123 on: November 22, 2009, 03:00:37 AM »

why England doesn't move to Norway or one of those seas next to Sev is interesting.  Seems like you'd either hold Sev hostage or just move into Denmark.

England will certainly own Spain by next turn, maybe she just doesn't want to make any unnecessary enemies. 

On the other side of the map I thought the hold on Greece was interesting. With a hold it couldn't contribute to the turn's action. Had it been used to support the move into Bulgaria, it would have freed up the Aegean fleet to get in position for action in the following spring.

     I wouldn't have moved the Aegean fleet anyway. That doesn't really suit my playing style. Tongue
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #124 on: November 22, 2009, 05:09:41 AM »

Yeah, what's up with Erc? Giving up?

Why Sweden wouldn't move to Norway is obvious - he has a pact with Teddy. Why he wouldn't move down to Denmark is less obvious, given that Germany looks (and looked before the move) to be crumbling, though maybe he doesn't fully trust Ted.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.069 seconds with 13 queries.